Sentences with phrase «first try believing»

Not exact matches

As the lovely James from Men with Pens and Damn Fine Words recently suggested I try, sit down with a pen and write out some «I Believe» statements on just why you started your journey online in the first place.

Not believing in yourself will stop you from trying in the first place.

After the first spike and crash, and after what some folks wrote about it - including your humble servant right here - it would seem that people would realize what kind of outfit this is, and that they would try to exit their shares, and be done with it, having learned a lesson about believing corporate gobbledygook instead of doing research.

A relatively popular first - term politician in his constituency who many watchers believe will still do well in the next election (as an PC or an Independent), Mr. Allen left the PC caucus after he was arrested while trying to hire two prostitutes in St. Paul, Minnesota.

get them to believe it first, then have them try to spread it.

People believe what they want to believe in and the first amendment protects them from you trying to force them to believe what you want them to do.

Makes more sense to me than to try to believe God plopped Adam and Eve down, and then told them not to eat that one fruit, lest they die — as if they would have had any idea what death was (did your toddler understand «burn» before he got his first one?).

First I want to say that I'm not saying Atheist is a religion in a bad sence or to try and produce some sort of shame only that it falls under the definition of a religion and wondering how it would change your feelings \ view of Atheism even if everybody considered it a religous view, if it's something you believe to be true (that there is no god) what does it matter if someone labels it as your world view?

This article is among the first to try to examine the character of Mitt Romney by investigating what he believes and how he acts on those beliefs.

For years I believed that what a rapist did was my fault; that belief was confirmed the first time I tried to tell anyone about what he'd done — before I could even finish, the Christian counselor interrupted me and told me I needed to «repent.»

Hmmm... have always tried to apply»... my understanding of the AA Recovery Program...» and regardless of my sided interpretations and / or in spite of my very own self, it continues to work; and to think, MY FIRST TWO STEPS IN BOTH BELIEVING AND RECOVERY WERE»... SKEPTICISM & PESSIMISM...» and now I'm convinced that he, she, they or it knows and obviously, I don't... to each their own!

Kweku Biney believes it was God who first drew his attention to a sign advertising skating lessons, which inspired him to ask Maame if she wanted to try — though he sometimes regretted it when his little girl woke him up early on Saturdays to go to the rink.

sounds more like «corporate brainstorming», but what I was trying to suggest is that it appears that we're witnessing (not intentionally) an evolving understanding of what wd become more central to the narrative and eventually orthodox.That is, if you cdn't believe it, you were out the door.A good example wd be the higher Christology that the fourth gospel reflects and more specifically, the virgin birth which it (like Mark and Paul) doesn't mention.If the birth narratives that we're familiar with are absent from the earliest gospel and the most theological gospel that came decades later, and can only be found in the other two gospels that we know used the first, it at least suggests a growing and evolving understanding of who Jesus «was» and «is».

I like this comment you made: > I believe that John, in his Gospel, is trying to get people to see that Jesus is God, and is possibly trying to instill more meaning in the terms «Christ» and «Son of God» than the average person in the first century would have understood or immediately grasped.

What do you expect from a group of people who believe trying to attain knowledge is what screwed things up in the first place (eating of the apple).

The parables disclose with what pleasure and tolerance he surveyed the broad scene of human activity: the merchant seeking pearls; the farmer sowing his fields; the real - estate man trying to buy a piece of land in which he had secret reason to believe a treasure lay buried; the dishonest secretary, who had been given notice, making friends against the evil day among his employer's debtors by reducing their obligations; the five young women sleeping with lamps burning while the bridegroom tarried and unable to attend the marriage because their sisters who had had foresight enough to bring additional oil refused to lend them any; the rich man whose guests for dinner all made excuses; the man comfortably in bed with his children who gets up at midnight to help his importunate neighbor only because he despairs of getting rid of him otherwise; the king who is out to capture a city; the man who built his house upon the sand and lost it in the first storm of wind and rain; the queer employer who pays all of his men the same wage whether they have worked the whole day or a single hour; the great lord who going to a distant land entrusts his property to his three servants and judges them by the success of their investments when he returns; the shepherd whose sheep falls into a ditch; the woman with ten pieces of silver who, losing one, lights the candle and sweeps diligently till she finds it, and makes the finding of it the occasion of a celebration in which all of her neighbors are invited to share — and how long such a list might be!

First, I just lived my own vision, er, sorry, lived my faith as I believed was right, trying to focus on the areas where I could do my own thing without crossing swords (although I often failed in avoiding conflict).

Sgstuck, yes I think I am being naiive, unfortunately, not all Christians believe in respecting others» beliefs and go too far in trying to convert others (They should take the log out of their own eye first).

So you pray to your god, let your neighbor pray to his god (unless he just doesn't believe in one) and leave everyone that disagrees with you alone, because you can not prove you are right and trying to force them to believe violates their First Amendment rights ever bit as much as them telling you NOT to pray to your god violates yours!

Most Christian movies are trying to present at least a portion of the gospel (Jesus was the son of God, allowed himself to be killed as a sacrifice for man's sins and was the first raised from the dead with a promise to raise all those who believed and accepted his sacrifice).

The first position appeals to reasonable (not simply conformist and hypocritical) Christians who believe that, after all, every period of human history has its values: that it is better to try to Christianize a given situation than to enter into conflict with it; and that one can not sweep the whole socia1 and cultural edifice into outer darkness.

I tried to explain to him that is was not possible for me to hate something that I did not believe existed in the first place.

Looking for explanations as to why make believe sky fairies don't intervene is simply religious people trying to explain something that doesn't make sense in the first place.

Laughing — First of all, i'm not the only one that Knows the Big Bang theory does not hold weight and has many holes in it, many leading physicists do not believe in it, it's a Theory like you said moron... I don't have to be the one to try and disprove it to you, Do your own research, the folks that work the most with the theory haven't staked their entire faith or belief in it, because they know it's not proven and it can not be proven.

While you can use each of them individually to add a little bit of kick and flavor (and believe me, I have), this is the first time I've tried experimenting with tahini and miso together.

Believe it or not, I just tried broccolini for the first time yesterday!

& last year was the first time i ever -LCB- dared -RCB- to try oysters — i couldn't believe i did it.

Today I'm trying it for da first time I thk I will try your version next I can't wait until it's done o believe it's gonna b delicious!

I can't believe I actually remember this, but the first chocolate bar I ever tried was a Reese's Peanut Butter Cup.

I couldn't believe how well this turned out on the first try.

Believe me i was trying biriyani for the first time.

I believe the first time I tried zucchini was at one of my favorite little lunch dives in Houston inside the Galleria mall, which ironically is named «zucchini's».

I couldn't believe that it worked out so well on the first try.

I know there is a lot of research for me to do to help me get a better grasp of how I can help those being affected during these trying times, and I believe that being vocal about my views is definitely the first step.

Would you believe I just tried Chipotle for the first time just a few short weeks ago?

When I first tried it I couldn't believe how perfectly crunchy and maple - y and slightly nutty it was.

When I first tried it at her house, I could not believe it was made from scratch!

I almost could not believe that it actually tasted like «real whole - wheat bread» when I tried it for the first time.

over my first year of being gluten - free and can't believe now that I never used to eat it, and how many people probably will probably never try buckwheat groats because they don't «have» to.

I believe this will be my first to try.

You may have noticed my love for all things black bean (so much more to come) and I can not, as in, can not believe that this is the first time I am trying a black bean salsa.

Believe me, when I first tried this technique, I felt like a klutz, but I've gotten much better at it with more practice.

I believe his agent is probably trying to get a bumper deal for him by putting out these rumours, first it was Liverpool and now Chelsea.

Last season we sang «you are not fit to wear the shirt», but I firmly believe none of those players cares about the manager and this is the first time I feel like our players are doing what Chelsea players try to do when things go wrong.

Whilst some will argue he was forced out, many believe that Wilshere recognised that if he is to try and get his club career back on track, he needs to go to a team that can offer him regular first team football where he can attempt to build on his fitness.

JW not for the first time I applaud you with the article you have posted.For all you AKB, s you should note the objectiveness and argument of what JW has said and the rationale he uses to at least understand and consider other fans views, to which of course you are entitled.Me I honestly believe you are Deluded, Outdated and WRONG.Wenger would have had respect if he had gone when he KNEW it was all coming apart.This is not recent this is 7 - 8 seasons ago.But I do sympathise how difficult it must be dragging yourself through these tough tough times on # 9miilion f *** ing a year.All you AKB, s really do need to wake up to the reality of the position we are in and who is responsible for us being there.Who are you going to worship when he finally goes or are you going with him.Pathetic to even try to respond to opinion that is proved by where we are as a club.JW — WE SALUTE YOU

I think people just don't get that, they sort of believe that everyone in there was bought to try and make the first team their own.

even when he suffered a serious knee injury, instead of accepting the fact that he would never stick his legs into the spaces that were crucial for someone with straight ahead speed to succeed, the club actually contemplated giving him a chance to play up top where his lack of physicality, size and holding up play talents would been on display for all to see... these are not the actions of a club that really cares about winning at the highest levels, but they are the actions of a club that wasn't interested in spending the necessary resources to purchases a world - class striker, which is usually the most expensive position on the pitch... instead we adopted the horrible phrase «like a new signing» and proceeded to allow this ridiculous experiment to carry on, which ultimately caused some discomfort on the training pitch and inside the locker room as players battled for a position that shouldn't have been theirs for the taking in the first place... don't get me wrong, I believe that Walcott is a talented player, who can help a team reach their goals, if their goals are relatively modest... just look at the teams who supposedly expressed interest in his services and they weren't the kind of clubs who aspire to win at the highest levels... as for the reasons why he hasn't been bitching and moaning about moving on just look at the wage benefits he receives from our club and his obvious desire to enjoy the societal advantages that come with playing in North London for a club with worldwide appeal... so instead of continuing to try to fix a coat with a broken zipper simply move on and buy a new and better coat

Are you really naive enough to believe that Wenger would bring anyone into this current locker room that is going to be given a strong voice... have you not been watching, listening or reading about our club for years... Lehman is a blind Wenger follower, which is the only reason he was even considered... just for a second think of all the strong personalities that have played for this club that have never been seriously considered even though they have expressed legitimate interest in participating in the coaching process... even worse, think of all the former greats who aren't even allowed on the same pitch as Wenger because they have offered their advice and / or criticism to the infallible one... I dare you to find a manager that has distanced himself from his former players as much as this man... it's the very reason why only one player I can think of has ever returned to play for Wenger and that was Flamini, which was hilarious considering we were desperately looking for a top quality defensive midfielder but Wenger could somehow find no one better than Flamini in the whole wide world... let's face it this club was simply trying to appease it's disgruntled fans by declaring that Wenger would no longer be given Ca rte Blanche when it came to the backroom staff so they probably asked him to give them a list of those who he would allow in the locker room... on that list he wrote Lehman, Pires and Bergkamp, likely because the first two are the only former players who haven't publicly questioned his horrible decision - making and the last one because he won't get in an airplane

So the problems of the first team were mirrored here — namely centre backs who don't cut out crosses and make effective headed clearances and a reluctance to shoot (although I believe Chuks Aneke did try his luck with a few shots towards the end of the game.)