Sentences with phrase «first understand something»

Let's first understand something about the human body.

But to fully understand how the tax bill will affect you and your business, it's important to first understand something about your business itself.

Not exact matches

«I've always had my wife LaTanya, who's my harshest critic,» Jackson told The Guardian «She'd say, «You're so intelligent that the first time you read something, you think you understand it intellectually and emotionally... But there's no blood in it.»»

I deeply understand product and systems design, but I'll be the first to admit that most engineering curricula lack training in the customer experience — something that could be detrimental to a company.

The first thing to understand is that we don't go to bed and wake up and suddenly something that wasn't working magically works.

But in order to say anything useful about ethical issues in the marketplace, you first need to understand something about how markets work, how they fail, and what the ethical argument for their existence is.

It's tough to understand at first, but walk away for a moment and, suddenly, something clicks.

I remember staring at it on the page and feeling like a boy noticing girls for the first time: There's something really interesting here, but I know there's a lot more to it than I currently understand.

And I understand the whole idea of that first job really boosting up income, just wish there was a way I could focus my financial efforts on something more long term in the mean time: /.

Chunking is the understanding that when you're first learning a new skill or trying to get something done, like cooking, it can feel like you're trying to accomplish 100 things.

I think sometimes when I watch him operate, I think he might be one of the first people who really understood the genius of the wisdom - of - crowds idea, that he — so you know, ask a bunch of people what they think about something, and then why.

When your venture aims to do something no one has done before — in our case, develop and commercialize the first - ever in vitro diagnostic blood test to aid in the evaluation of patients with suspected TBI, also known as concussion — you want an attorney and a law firm that will take the time to understand your unique needs and clear legal roadblocks before you can even anticipate them.

Because if you're just using a Ouija board, and the market starts going against you for some period of time, you're stuck - either you continue to follow something when you have no idea why it should work in the first place, or now you've got to find something else that works even though you don't understand why.

Just because we didn't know something yesterday doesn't mean it didn't exist yesterday, and just because we misunderstand it the first time we encounter it doesn't mean that it somehow changes as our understanding changes.

Perhaps you are missing something in understanding why Jesus came to earth in the first place.

Instead of studying it to understand what it teaches, we'd rather feel / believe something first and then look for verses to convince ourselves that that's what the Bible really says.

The first invited me understand the principle that would make something beloved by G * d, the second seemed arbitrary and capricious.

As an atheist, I really love how the first stage is that the atheist says something, but the Christian is too stupid to understand it... which is somehow the atheist's problem.

In other words, the sacrifice that saves the world is first of all a kind of commerce between the human and the divine, something the Hindu understands as well as the Christian.

For example, people reading this exchange with a view to assessing the validity of Madden's criticisms of my position and the soundness of my rebuttal are acting on one of practical reason's per se nota first principles» namely, that intellectual understanding of matters such as those under discussion is something worth having and expending time and effort to achieve.

If instead you mean something akin to a crocodile giving birth to a duck then you just don't understand what the theory of evolution describes and should educate yourself on it first before offering such a woefully uneducated opinion on it.

If such talk is construed objectively, as asserting that God is in some way the object of human experience, the fact that «God» must be understood to express a nonempirical concept means that no empirical evidence can possibly be relevant to the question of whether the concept applies and that, therefore, God must be experienced directly rather than merely indirectly through first experiencing something else.

We need to comprehend the first link if we are to understand something of the process by which sacrifice was displaced from an actual bloody ritual practice to a metaphor for moral action, such that we can now say «he was very self - sacrificial» and not mean «he offered his body to Aztec priests.»

I think the crux of understanding Christian nonviolence is to first relinquish the notion that it is some sort of theory that develops as a response to something called «violence.»

As i said, people can be so vile — therefore, i can be so vile as well, you too — but understanding is the first step to not doing something like that of others when hate is overwhelming!

G - D, this volcano you speak of probably just needs a human sacrifice to calm it, you know like the barbarians of old used to do when they did not understand something, or maybe offer up your first born son to your invisible man in the sky, blood always seems to calm him down, it may ease your «righteous» anger as well.

In order to understand a deacon or priest's relationship to his bishop, one must first know something about the rights and obligations of the bishop himself.

Unless we understand something of life in the first century, says archaeologist Jonathan L. Reed, we have «no chance of understanding Jesus or Paul, Peter or Mary.»

Did you understand lying to be something wrong the very first time that you did it, or was it something that you did prior to being told it was wrong?

In so far as the early Christian gospel was addressed to Jews and / or gentiles of the first century, it can certainly be understood in a more specific way if we know something about the first - century world; on the other hand, it may be that we shall be tempted to make what was intended generally more specific than it actually was when we relate it too closely to the first century.

Thank you — I understand it's just the liquid from the beans but do I just literally substitute for the egg or do I need to do something to it first?

I suppose it probably could, although it is my understanding that in order to can stuff, you need to heat it up first and I cooking the dates is something I would rather avoid doing.

Something else i do nt understand — in a game were we haven't had a shot at goal in the first 30 min, we still opt for a quick free — kick in a dangerous position or a short corner and loose the ball in both instances.

I still don't understand people's obsession with boxing players in to a specific role... The whole «true DM» is a dying breed, even Coquelin is arguably something else considering the advanced positions he takes up often in front of Santi and takes major risks in winning the ball back for us... IMO, the reason Coquelin has had such a successful integration into the first team is that he focussed incredibly hard on the basics of his role first and foremost before adding other elements to his game (long - balls, driving runs into space, more aggressive ball movement in general) it's not rocket science to tell a player to curb the attacking side of their game and focus primarily on defence before attack... Nor is it that hard to see that playing in a midfield pairing with either Ramsey or Cazorla is going to be different as well.

Sterling already confirm in the first league, he is a certitude, we don't need another Walcott to keep 4 - 5 years and not confirm.I don't understand that part of fans who want that team to play with no name young players, but to win trophies.This is a young and a player who will play sure in the first 11, not who come to get some chances and play a match he, another Gnabry, another Welington, etc.Let's have a great first 11, and on the bunch young players, to can win something, not just play the game for fun, we have a profesional club, not an amateur one.

I believe now we have a squad that can win us the title any addition will be a bonus for me.Dm coq, arteta, chambers, hyden can all play there if needed.ST theo, welbeck, girue this is where I have doubts cuz they all have something to prove but I will be confident to win the title with what we have.I understand there cowards here who are always scared of chelsea, they never outplayed us last season in the first place

Before I answer the question of how seriously Liverpool Football Club should take the cup competitions, I think it is important to first do something that Liverpool fans are famous for: talk about our history; it is vital to understand the philosophies that this great club was built on.

Maksim you are 100 % percent right about Dan Petrescu's faith in youngsters.In just a few months he gave chances to Ivan Solovyov, Pavel Solomatin and Vladimir Sobolev to play in the first team.As for Mogilevets i think he will become and excellent player but not at Zenit.He needs to move elsewhere (and not on loan) to play first team football like Ionov did a few years ago.In my opoinion Zenit needs a striker (if they sell Hulk to AS Monaco) to score goals.Kerzhakov is not at his best, Bukharov has forgotten when was the last time he score and Dordevic is not gonna get a chance.I understand that midfielders of Zenit are all capable of scoring goals like Shirokov, Danny, Witsel, Bystrov and Fayzulin but thats striker's job and Zenit may lose a player on the filed.And something else, i was so impressed with Yuri Lodigin's performance against Krasnodar and maybe Zenit found a great replacement for Malafeev.

There is no site like this in my country and I was very grateful to the author of this one because I learnt a lot and finally found someone who feels like me... When I first read all these comments I cried as if I found a good friend who understands me... I do something which has always been very natural and still is to mammals in this world and please, if you disagree, do not criticize us and do not jump to conclusions because it hurts...

First of all, as a parent, understand that when they think you said something and you know you didn't say it; they really thing that's what you said.

A noun doesn't have to describe something we can see or touch, although at first these are the nouns your toddler will understand.

While some people may get excited at hearing their baby say a word in the early months, there is some debate about if a baby's first word is actually referencing something and they understand what they are saying, or if the baby is simply just babbling.

With a third baby due to arrive any day now, I understand something I didn't see after the arrival of our first baby: Your marriage is never really ready for a baby, whether it's your first, second, or sixth.

this is not neutral ground, this is an incredibly loaded subject dealing with women, women's bodies, medicine, motherhood, etc, etc. and i find it incredibly irresponsible to present «orgasmic birth» somehow as yet another new way of going through childbirth (while implicitly laying the blame of not achieving this on the mother) when it's obviously first of all, not «orgasmic» in the commonly understood sense of the word, nor is it something that is at all common or controlled by the mother.

It's good for you guys to know as well in case someone close to you is going through it and you don't quite understand it It is something that can affect women for much longer than the first months after a baby is born.

Very often I will have a mom who was not successful breastfeeding her first baby because she «did not make enough», only to find out that it was something that interfered with her normal production or just her understanding.

This is not the first time this has happened - I explain my concerns to a nurse or midwife, who suggest a routine visit or a wait and see approach, then I speak to a Dr, explain my concerns and they immediately understand and make something happen ASAP.

He said apparently because former President Jonathan could not understand how credible and dedicated leadership could impact positively on the morale and performance of troops, he has chosen to denigrate the system for the unprecedented feat that was achieved within the first six months of the Buhari Administration — something that he could not achieve in all of six years.

Watling: Well, I [turned it] into a free one only after [about a] week; in fact, when I got my first report and it showed me that I thought I had, you know, 40 sales or something, but then I couldn't understand [the report;] [it] was quite a big table of information.

And if you want to understand something you have to first measure it, and that's what these ships are designed to do.