The Doug Purvis Memorial Lecture — Monetary /
Fiscal Policy Mix and Financial Stability: The Medium Term Is Still the Message
Monetary /
Fiscal Policy Mix and Financial Stability: The Medium Term Is Still the Message - Stephen S. Poloz, the Governor of the Bank of Canada, delivers the Canadian Economics Association's Purvis Lecture (12:55 (ET) approx.)
The paper finds that there is an intimate relationship between the monetary /
fiscal policy mix and the dynamics of both private sector and public sector debt accumulation.
«A better understanding of the medium - term trade - off of private sector versus public sector debt will be helpful in developing stronger guidance around the monetary /
fiscal policy mix,» Poloz said in his speech.
Not exact matches
On June 4, Poloz delivered a lecture in Ottawa on the proper
mix of
fiscal and monetary
policy.
The data covers the first full month in office for Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, who was elected in December and has vowed to revive the world's third - largest economy with his «Abenomics»
policy mix of monetary and
fiscal stimulus.
A push by Washington for more business - friendly regulation and
fiscal support for the economy could improve America's
mix of
policies which in recent years have relied too much on the Federal Reserve, Fed Governor Jerome Powell said.
This paper investigates the significance of the
mix of monetary and
fiscal policies for financial stability through counterfactual simulations of three key historical episodes, using the Bank's main
policy model, ToTEM (Terms - of - Trade Economic Model).
In the Doug Purvis Memorial Lecture, Governor Stephen S. Poloz shows how changing the
mix of monetary and
fiscal policies can yield the same outcomes for growth and inflation, but lead to different results for public sector and private sector debt levels, which can impact financial stability.
To overcome these limits, the
policy mix needs to shift toward
fiscal policy.
It is certainly reasonable to believe that this source of UST selling will continue to keep USTS rallies «limp,» and still in front of a very pro-growth / reflationary Trump
policy mix to come: lower corporate and individual taxes, industry deregulation, trade
policy (tariffs will drive up domestic prices as cheaper international goods competition is removed) and a
fiscal policy shift away from monetary
policy will all conspire to take rates higher in the year + window ahead.
This supportive
fiscal and monetary
policy will help Modi and his reform allies stay on their structural - reform path, much as Japan's aggressive
policy mix has helped Shinzo Abe.
I've been searching for textual references to back up this assertion, with
mixed - ish results and no real smoking gun, but whatever — the fundamental holds: Central bankers should offer opinions on what
fiscal policy ought to be when
fiscal policy is a problem for them.
The Federal Reserve can alter the
mix of government liabilities (bonds held by the public vs. money held by the public), but the total amount of these liabilities is determined by
fiscal policy, not monetary
policy.
Booms and Busts Money and Banking Monetary
Policy: Monetary Inflation and Credit Expansion The Business Cycle
Fiscal Policy Interventionism: Price Controls Interventionism: Product Controls The
Mixed Economy The Command Economy: Socialism and Fascism
Business and market cycles occur every 5 to 8 years, and may be addressed by
policy makers with a typical
mix of
fiscal and monetary
policy.