Not exact matches
These pass into a «blanket» of heavy water, through which actinide
waste or
fission products circulate.
The annual
waste output from a fast reactor with the same electrical capacity, in contrast, is a little more than a single ton of
fission products, plus trace amounts of transuranics.
The
fission products, which make up about 5 percent of the used fuel, are the true
wastes — the ashes, if you will, of the
fission fire.
Science answers: Spent fuel is more dangerous because it contains a mixture of
fission products, some of which can be long - lived radioactive
waste, and also plutonium which is highly toxic.
The idea remains that fast reactors, which get their name because the neutrons that initiate
fission in the reactor are zipping about faster than those in a conventional reactor, could offer a speedy solution to cleaning some nasty nuclear
waste, which
fissions better with fast neutrons, while also providing electricity as a by -
product.
Conventional nuclear
waste contains 96.6 % uranium oxide, 3.4 %
fission products and 1 % long lived actinides.
These are «
fission products» and account for most of the heat and radioactivity in high - level
waste.
Fission products — a small proportion of the
waste — can be removed using a plasma mass filter after each burn cycle.
They can also be processed while the reactor is operating to scrub out the
fission products that are the real nuclear
waste.
Then second group of leftovers are the
fission products (the actual
waste of
fission).
The fluoride salt thorium reactor can produce nuclear
wastes that consist only of
fission products, which quickly decay to stable elements - in fact some elements like xenon or rhodium represent valuable commercial
products after a few months «cooling down».
Having
waste that only consists of
fission products means that the
waste only needs to be stored for a few hundred years, not the thousands of years needed for «once - through» uranium
waste.