Not exact matches
«It smacked of an institution starting
with a conclusion and shaping any
arguments to
fit it.»
It's the kind of common - sense, let - the - people - decide
argument that would
fit well in the mouth of a former public servant
with a «higher loyalty» in mind.
This
fits with the memo's overall method of
argument, which is to imply something suspicious without outright asserting malfeasance.
But if you are looking for consilience, in which multiple lines of independent evidence converge on the same target, then Schwartz's
argument is a good one to have in your arsenal, for it
fits nicely
with biological
arguments for intelligent design (cf. Michael Behe's Darwin's Black Box), recent philosophical work on mental causation (cf. Robert Koons» Realism Regained), cosmological fine - tuning (cf. John Barrow and Frank Tipler's The Anthropic Cosmological Principle), and consciousness studies (cf. Dean Radin's The Conscious Universe).
The problem is, when read in isolation, Romans 13 doesn't
fit well
with Paul's
argument in the rest of the epistle.
and because what is being asked doesn't
fit in
with what they choose to do... they reject God and use whatever
arguments are at hand to support their position.
I see neither the means nor the end of this task of redescription as
fitting in
with the
arguments of either Bloom or Hirsch, based as they are on the notion of a fixed and definable content for education.
If, for example, you've ever struggled
with what Romans 9 - 11 has to do
with the rest of the letter, Wright's view makes these chapters not only
fit within the flow of Paul's
argument, but actually become the pinnacle and the climax of Romans.
He shows that this is similar to Chesterton's approach and W.V.O. Quine's
argument that «the only valid test of a belief is whether it
fits into a web of connected beliefs that accords
with our experience of the whole» (p. 63 - I would think that Newman's concept of the «Illative Sense» would dovetail
with this.)
The book was filled
with disjointed
fits and starts that tied up his
argument and nearly strangled it.
It turns out, however, that these presumptions
fit nicely
with a wide array of different and perhaps even contradictory metaphysical schemes, and I doubt the
arguments in the area of Hebrew philology change much if one is an ancient Platonist, a medieval Aristotelian, or a modern - day logical positivist.
Radical
arguments for and against historicity are balanced out
with a careful review of the ways that the story does
fit with the early second millennium, 2200 to 2000 B.C.E.
Arsenal are blessed
with with a large squad of performing stars at present, and
with Olivier Giroud
fit and ready to return, there could be
argument for a switch in tactics.
That
argument of «would this player start for these guys if they're fully
fit» is pretty daft when he'd be at best a 3rd or 4th choice at striker or wide
with us when our squad's fully
fit...
The report goes on to make a strong
argument as to why Williams would be perfect for the Premier League given his power and pace, while they also note that Klopp is still ultimately looking to sign young players
with big futures and so the Bilbao ace
fits the bill.
A similar
argument could be made over City's need for another forward though, as
with Aguero scoring 30 goals in 37 games so far this season, coupled
with the likes of Leroy Sane, Gabriel Jesus, Raheem Sterling, David Silva and others, it's questionable as to where Griezmann would
fit in.
I have no doubt that you can contribute something but you post
with such vitriol and elementary dismissal that I never get an
argument from you so much as I get a
fit.
There are three
arguments in Burton's favor: he
fits a position of need
with Zach Miller a free agent and
with an injury putting future in question, he worked well
with a rookie Carson Wentz (a career - high 37 receptions) in a depleted Philadelphia receiving corps in 2016, and he'll likely play more wideout in Chicago.
The only
argument of Arsenal is that Dembele would easily
fit in
with them.
Lewis I think you prosecute your
argument well and powerfully, that complaining about unfair treatment because of who you happen to be
fits oddly
with accepting the privileges and duties of hereditary monarchy.
He had either under - performed so badly that he was not
fit for his office, their
argument went: or, in fact, he had actually connived and plotted, along
with his office, to help the Leave camp that he so obviously backed in private.
The above reference is to buttress my
argument that the interpretation of constitution should be done in such a way that not only the laws
fit together but also which of the overarching principles provide the glue to keep them together as I will attempt to do
with the relevant sections of the 1992 Constitution.
Miller said these findings
fit with psychological research known as the «male warrior
argument» that focuses on men being hard - wired to fight.
Rotherham believes it is because «education reform doesn't
fit well
with the overall
argument either candidate is making Read more about Why Aren't Obama and Romney Talking About Education?
There are people who like print books, and I have no
argument with them either, because they, too, have a right to live their lives as they see
fit, although I would take exception if they choose to «evangelise» their views, much in the same way as those who choose to sit in their imaginary camps of anti-Troglodytes.
So you start
with the author's
argument [basic plot], touch on supporting evidence [characters and a major scene or two], what works or doesn't [ditto], and how it
fits in the literature [what other books it resembles or contrasts
with].
Finally, consider the statement, «The trouble
with being too open - minded is that your brains may fall out:» Such a proposition, startling and incongruous as it may seem,
fits this assignment; it implies a causal relationship as part of an
argument against the generally accepted positive standard of open - mindedness and tolerance.
It might be a bit weird if Assassin's Creed were a completely open sandbox for players to tinker
with, but he has an
argument with some elements from Minecraft potentially
fitting with a major brand like Assassin's Creed.
Lewis»
argument up until now that the best
fit to the transient evolution over the 20th Century is
with a relatively small sensitivity and small aerosol forcing (as opposed to a larger sensitivity and larger opposing aerosol forcing).
The
argument would need to be tightened up if we wer talking to a logician (e.g. to go from «very near» to «goddam good
fit»), but it is our hope that our magnificient truth seeker will be able to cope
with the missing gaps.
The tactic of a lawyer is to throw any
argument at the other side that they think they can get get away
with, rather than checking if it genuinely
fits the facts.
Further it is shown that carbon cycle modelling based on non-equilibrium models, remote from observed reality and chemical laws, made to
fit non-representative data through the use of non-linear ocean evasion «buffer» correction factors constructed from a pre-conceived idea, constitute a circular
argument and
with no scientific validity.
The problem
with that
argument is that a lower solar forcing than assumed in AR4 is going to make the model
fit for the early part of the 20th century even worse.
But approaching the question of discernable temperature anomalies and trends and correlations
with human behaviour
with curve
fitting... and then to bog down in
arguments about whether it is statistically valid to do so... does take the eye off physics
arguments and is just sooo missing the point.
Or it may happen through direct interactions
with a judge, such as evidentiary objections or motions, novel legal
arguments of how the law applies to facts, or motions or other
arguments that ask the judge to shape the law to
fit a previously unanticipated circumstance.
This judgment — the whole hearing,
with its videos, published supporting documents and thorough careful
arguments — is a fine and
fitting end to the ordeal.
Then you can address their concerns one at a time and follow up
with your well prepared
arguments for what makes you a good
fit for this position.