Horizontal and vertical evolution don't
fit your argument here.
So either I'm a politico (as I dislike politics and politicians, I doubt it) or at least one person doesn't
fit the argument here.
Not exact matches
Hence, @tallulah13's «flat earth» example
fits here, as a perfect counter
argument, that negates your assertion.
There are a fair few
arguments that kick off on
here regarding players playing in their «natural» positions and everyone has a single position tag / label they want to pin on a player and throw
fits if Wenger deviates from this.
In principle, these works might not seem to
fit within the
argument of the present exhibition but Gonzales's intention
here is to create a different optical effect and a unique visual experience.
Using climate change as an example
here, I will reframe the
arguments I made in the 2nd Flatland essay to
fit the updated model.