Sentences with phrase «fit your life on»

It is also made to fit your life on - the - go including delivers entertainment where you want it.

Not exact matches

So, if you're thinking of moving to a new city to save on expenses, be sure you take into account all the factors that go into its cost of living to find the place that's the best fit for you.

Besides its main line of business, which continues to be its HUD hardware that «snap fits» to existing ski goggles, RI also has other revenue streams including: app sales (for custom software running on MOD Live), consulting fees from prototyping and R&D work for its partners, and royalties from its partners.

I believe there is no one - size - fits - all approach and that people need to optimize all aspects of their lives on an individual basis.

Take the advice of your mentors and fit it into your life as you see fit, but everything you do should have your own spin on it.

Part of your audience profile should focus on how mobile fits into your customers» lives.

After testing the Urbanears Stadion myself, I can confidently say that they live up to their promise of an «on - target fit.»

In fact, many workers, especially millennials, put an emphasis on finding work that has meaning and purpose — work they are especially good at or that fits their life in some satisfying way.

For battery life, the Book 2 is also a good fit for both long typing sessions — it lasts 17 hours on a charge — and for late - night gaming sessions or virtual reality.

At The Future of Storytelling Summit, Wong told Entrepreneur that Silicon Valley advertisers mistakenly focus messaging on the best possible tech, instead of marketing the best possible life and how tech fits into it.

In a way, Tarantino has been making Westerns his whole life, so it's fitting that he's doubled down on the genre.

They tick all the boxes you want these things to tick: They're wireless, sweatproof, lightweight, sturdy, nice - feeling, and secure - fitting, with functional on - device controls, decent battery life (7 - 8 hours), and better sound than what's typical of earbuds like these.

thanks, and yes, a pittance of a pension and regular checkups keep us on budget and head off any problems — best decision i ever made (financial or otherwise) was serving our country doing search - and - rescue, oil and chemical spill remediation, etc. (you can guess the branch of service)-- along the way, frugal living, along with dollar - cost averaging, asset allocation, and diversification allowed us to retire early — Vanguard has been very good over the years, despite the Dot Bomb, 2002, and the recession (where we actually came out better with a modest but bargain retirement home purchase)... it's not easy building additional «legs» on a retirement platform, but now that we're here, cash, real estate, investments and insurance products, along with a small pension all help to avoid any real dependence on social security (we won't even need it at full retirement age)-- however, like nearly everybody, we're headed for Medicare in several years, albeit with a nice supplemental and pharmacy benefits — but our main concern is staying fit, active, and healthy!

In a Thanksgiving message posted yesterday on www.marthatalks.com — not marthastewart.com, official Web site of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. — she told fans that she is «safe, fit and healthy,» though she acknowledged that «the loss of freedom and the lack of privacy are extremely difficult.»

But quality of life for retirees moving abroad also depends in large part on being able to fit in quickly, learn the ropes, and mix well with the locals in their adapted communities.

Its current tagline, «Brewed for those who go the extra mile,» along with its other marketing efforts, represent a strong and simple focus on fitting into consumers» lives.

@ jack3 no you have the right to believe what ever you want, but we might mock you for believing in something that has talking snakes, a story about the world flooding and being able to fit all the animals on the planet on one boat, that believes in magic, that believes a person lived in the belly of a whale, and that people coexisted with dinosaurs all without any actual proof.

If they looked and were biologically completely different from every thing here on earth (Nitrogen based life forms instead of carbon based life forms for instance)-- How do you suppose that would fit in with religions?

It's only in the last century that people have tried to make the Bible fit their beliefs rather then align their life with what the bible says, and look at the results, the world is in turmoil and on a downward spiral out of control and this article is a good example of trying to make God's word an excuse to do every wrong thing there is real good reporting.

You don't know any of us on here but yet you judge us... most of us have explored the christian aspect and have come to the conclusion that it doesn't fit with how we view life... it doesn't make us wrong, it makes us human.

freedom of religion means that each person can worship as they see fit, not that anyone religion can invoke its will on others whether living or dead.

Christians have voted to put their God's name on everyones money, add «Under God» to the flag salute, force schools to teach intelligent design with absolutely no scientific basis along side the sciences, voted to write their moral laws on the fronts of public courthouses and tax funded buildings, voted to ban certain people from living together, being intimate or raising children because their orientation didn't fit with their bible beliefs.

Well, except for heathens, pagans, apostates, heretics, witches... oh and every living creature on the entire planet save for that which fit on a boat.

In Becoming Attached, psychologist Robert Karen explains, «[Early in life], one forms images of the self and others and of how they fit together, which have a powerful hold on the personality and serve as a blueprint for future relationships.»

Well - spoken words, on the other hand, provide a fitting conclusion to a life and encouragement for those who remain.

God did not see fit to remove all other life forms from planet earth on October 25, 2003, and so we shared that day with our parents, our grandparents, our aunts and uncles, our friends, our church, our neighbors, the church custodian, the band, the caterers, the photographer, the nursery staff, the people who honked their horns when they saw «Just Married» sprayed in shaving cream on our car windows, and the people who didn't.

I feel that all you could possibly need to know to lead a fruitful life concerning the Holy Spirit could easily fit on fewer than ten pages of text.

The point is to make a life together, based on your unique circumstances and gifts, not to force yourselves into prescribed roles regardless of how they fit.

And that they fit 2 of every animal on the planet in one boat more plausable?What universe are you living in?

True ethical conduct means developing your own code that fits (and can be refitted) to human life on earth.

On the other hand, I've started in this way because my experience of people living out their vocations doesn't always fit easily into these categories.

Just fyi, I am not a religious person and I believe everyone on this planet has the right to live their life as they see fit as long as they are not hurting others.

They theorize that the source texts were modified to be more believable as nobody would be able to imagine all life on Earth fitting into a box no bigger than a phone booth.

Like on one hand telling them to be individuals then on the other heavier hand demanding that they be «politically correct,» to «fit in,» and to never question some things in life.

In the UK our government have seen fit to make cut backs on those who need not only financial but emotional and practical help in their day to day life.

In the hurly - burly of modem life, fundamentalists knew exactly where they fit on the landscape.

As to special speakings, sermons, large group discussions, and so on, my general observation is that these are successful according to the degree: (1) that they are competently planned; (2) that they fit both fore and aft into the ongoing life of the organization, be it local church, college, hospital, or some other institution.

In which case I see three choices: get on with the party and live it up because this is it, blow your brains out since your life is meaningless, or try to be the fittest and decimate those around you (One with the most toys wins).

But then on the other hand how on earth can one expect to find an essential consciousness of sin (and after all that is what Christianity wants) in a life which is so retarded by triviality, by a chattering imitation of «the others,» that one hardly can call it sin, that it is too spiritless to be so called, and fit only, as the Scripture says, to be «spewed out»?

Water costs nothing; and a man who can not live on bread is not fit to live.

The notions of intellect and will or desireare schemata that we (following the philosophers of ancient Greece) impose on human life for the purpose of describing and influencing it; and the notions of faith, hope and charity are further schemata fitted on by theologians as life rises above what is natural.

Anyway, let me get your thoughts on the subject in the comment section below, and if you want to learn more about how the gospel truth that Jesus is God fits in with the offer of eternal life through Jesus, take my online course on the gospel:

It wasn't fitting for an unmarried daughter to live on her own.

He gave you life and does place responsibilty on you to recognize him as you creator... again it doesn't «fit» your view of how he should be, therefore you dismiss his existence... and he will «talk» to you in the afterlife... you can bet on that.

So, the next time you proudly proclaim that you know the secrets to life, death, the origins of life on Earth and the origins of the Universe, because your parents or priest taught you some comforting stories from late Bronze Age Palestine as a ten year - old, you might like to consider where your beliefs fit into the bigger picture.

Think «plagues», commandments to slaughter men, women and children, flooding the earth and murdering every living thing, save what fit on Noah's Arc..., murdering the first born of egyptians... because you know, they were certainly guilty of something.

I know that the burden of proof lies upon me to show how my thesis fits with Scripture, but I am beginning to think that the real burden of proof lies upon those who want to maintain that God is violent despite all the evidence to the contrary in the life, ministry, and teachings of Jesus Christ, and especially in what He did for the entire world on the cross.

He has a take on angels, Satan, and demons which I have never heard before, and which seems to fit the biblical text in a way that, if true, would cause me to read much of Scripture in a whole different way, and which would cause me to view life, and governments, and cities, and politics, and animals, and plants and pretty much everything in a whole new way also.

As to alcoholics, he says: «The broad interpretation that best fits the evidence is that heavy drinkers are people for whom drinking has become a central activity in their way of life... for the long - term heavy drinker, life has come to center on drinking — life [that] is pervaded by a preoccupation with drinking, shaped and driven by the quest for drink, drinking situations, and drinking friends» (p. 100).

The teacher's approach to such problems might start from three assumptions: (a) the teacher should be concerned with how science fits into the larger framework of life, and the student should raise questions about the meaning of what he studies and its relation to other fields; (b) controversial questions can be treated, not in a spirit of indoctrination, but with an emphasis on asking questions and helping students think through assumptions and implications; an effort should be made to present viewpoints other than one's own as fairly as possible, respecting the integrity of the student by avoiding undue imposition of the lecturer's beliefs; (c) presuppositions inevitably enter the classroom presentation of many subjects, so that a viewpoint frankly and explicitly recognized may be less dangerous than one which is hidden and assumed not to exist.