Almost every believer I have ever talked to wants to use the logic of complex creations requiring a creator but fail to grasp the simple and unavoidable
flaw in that logic which is that the super complex entlty it would take to design and build the universe would then by its own complexity require a more complex entlty to have created it and so on.
Not exact matches
Christianity, and
in fact any religion that believes
in a personal god / creator, has two fundamental
flaws that have absolutely nothing to do with science and everything to do with
logic,
which incidentally forms the foundation for the only universal / objective truths of reality (putting aside the Cartesian dualism problem).
And maybe the worst
flaw in the series was the introduction of the Bat mobile
which not only breaks so much Batman
logic that the game ceases to be about this character.
(Although, given that your first post
in this thread told Gavin that you «would point out a
flaw in his
logic», with no caveats or maybes, on a subject often discussed here, on
which Gavin is certainly a high expert, I'm not sure what you mean when you say «tenor».)
«I much admire Max's keen ability to find
flaws in those refutations of the paper's
logic for
which no one else has been able to find any
flaw.
If you count papers
which don't address the issue at all you could bring
in hundreds of thousands of papers on quantum physics, stellar cartography, economics, sociiology, et cetera and claim that since none of these take any position on global warming there is less than 1 % support for it... or any other subject you want to dismiss via blatantly
flawed logic.
Which shows a
flaw in your
logic.
In this way the
logic of the 30,000 petition is completely
flawed,
which isn't surprising given its questionable beginnings.
In the Union without internal frontiers where EU citizenship is getting stronger every day, there is no reason to respect the fears of Germans more than the fears of Italians,
which the
flawed logic of the Opinion seems to imply.