Triennial vaccination, although it delivers fewer vaccinations to your dog, is just as
flawed in its logic as annual vaccination.
Not exact matches
In the still - growing storm of protest, accountants, economists, and certified financial planners across the land have decried the government's
logic as being deeply
flawed and have categorically refuted the underlying assumptions.
The likes of McCrory and Associate Professor Gavin Davis, another member of the AFL working group who shares the increasingly
flawed logic inherent
in the former's position are emerging
as little more than water - muddying mouthpieces.
As a parent, I can't seem to find the
flaws in this
logic.
As for the metrics that you've described
in measuring the «professional» standard, they are
flawed in the following respects: Professional via publication — publishers are profit - driven, not a good indicator of excellence; Professional through number
in print — numbers can be altered with marketing and time (by this
logic, the Bible, Kuran, and the Communist Manifesto are perhaps the most professional work ever written); Money — there are plenty of professional idiots out there with more money than deserved; Peer review — depends on the peer.
As always, blanket statements like «don't travel
in your early 20's» are typically clickbait and usually based
in flawed logic.
If guilt by association were actually valid according to «the basic rules of
logic and reasoning,»
as strong a case (or stronger) could easily be made for you, Joanne Nova (via Shell and ExxonMobil), being called a terrorist
as for James Hansen (via UK writer Keith Farnish) being called a terrorist; I knew no one would call me on any
flaw in that reasoning, since that is precisely the reasoning being used to smear Hansen.
I regard it
as a fundamental
flaw in logic to infer high confidence
in attribution since 1950, without understanding the warming
in the early part of the 20th century and the mid century hiatus.
Read your measured but notable comment on the «RC» Existence of any dichotomy of Gavin's understanding is barred from his public pronouncements even more so by his recent carrier elevation; result is a number of obvious
flaws in his
logic,
as distinct from his unquestionable intellectual ability (I am bound to say so, he got a degree from my old university, albeit one stage higher, but then standards deteriorated somewhat by time he joined).
Mr. Justice Macaulay rejected this defence and
in doing so used the best language I have yet come across
as an ICBC claims lawyer
in explaining the
flaw in the LVI Program's
logic.
Jerry acts
as George's Greek chorus and voice of truth, pointing out the
flaws in George's
logic and thinking.