Sentences with phrase «flawed logic at»

It's flawed logic at best — Capcom have always made a good fist of the big N's consoles, for one — but has always struck a minor chord and has seemingly come to pass with the Nintendo 3DS, a handheld that has struggled with a dearth of decent games since its launch.

Not exact matches

A high quality muni - bond portfolio can yield close to 4 % tax free, with inflation essentially not existent and equities at an all time high I'm curious if there is a flaw in my logic?

So your logic is horribly flawed, if you can even call your argument logical at all.

Fifth grade science at best, and the apologist's logic is deeply flawed.

I know my human understanding and logic is flawed at best.

The other flaw in the logic about sacking Christiansen is the lack of available options at this time of year.

Granted, the movie isn't without its flaws (particularly when it comes to basic common sense and logic, like in the climactic dino battle at the end), but it's an entertaining piece of fan service that makes up for having to suffer through the last two sequels.

So if I follow your obviously flawed logic, none of these cars should be racing at all.

The logic was flawed at best and the facts were completely out of touch with reality.

Here's the flaw with your logic - you're already admitting at least 20 % of her rumors are completely false.

Sierra adventure games had many flaws — the unpredictable parser that required instructions to be written «just so», the unexpected and seemingly unavoidable deaths, the genuinely insane puzzle logic and not to mention the fact that it was frequently possible to die on the very last screen of the game because you forgot to pick up some innocuous - looking item right at the start of the game.

Peers challenge the finding like intellectual piranhas, nipping at faulty logic, flawed data or unsupported conclusions.

He got tired of people pointing out the flaws in his logic and now posts at sites that agree with his thoughts?

I simply stated that if one assumes that this theory is correct then one arrives at the conclusion that most of the effect was due to H2O, with a much smaller portion due to CO2 and other GHGs, and that those like Lacis or Alley (with their «CO2 control knob» posit) are using flawed logic to attribute essentially the whole natural GH effect to CO2.

That's why they scream at you and call you names instead of explaining how your logic is flawed.

If you count papers which don't address the issue at all you could bring in hundreds of thousands of papers on quantum physics, stellar cartography, economics, sociiology, et cetera and claim that since none of these take any position on global warming there is less than 1 % support for it... or any other subject you want to dismiss via blatantly flawed logic.

The logic, though flawed, is at least consistent.