There are also several instances of
flawed logic in your argument.
Because the plot holes and
flawed logic in this film are big enough to fly Air Force One through.
Instead of seeing
the flawed logic in rintin assertion that Atheism leads to mass murder you proclaim that I must prove that Hitler was Not an atheist?
Not exact matches
The
logic in each case wasn't entirely
flawed, however.
A high quality muni - bond portfolio can yield close to 4 % tax free, with inflation essentially not existent and equities at an all time high I'm curious if there is a
flaw in my
logic?
In the still - growing storm of protest, accountants, economists, and certified financial planners across the land have decried the government's
logic as being deeply
flawed and have categorically refuted the underlying assumptions.
But there's a serious
flaw in this
logic.
To count the number of
flaws in your
logic is not worth the time because you would refuse to believe it anyway.
If that's what you believe, then you may wish to examine your
logic for evidence that 1) it is badly
flawed, or 2) the god you believe
in is a psychopath.
Especially evidence that points to
flaws in their reasoning and
logic.
In fact you know full well I and others here have made several valid points you've deliberately ignored because you don't have the integrity to acknowledge it when someone else has refuted your horribly
flawed logic.
Science,
logic and reason pointed out the
flaws in theistic beliefs that I could no longer deny.
In mathematics, arguments like «obviously» and «clearly» just don't cut it, and the slightest flaw in your logic renders your argument worthles
In mathematics, arguments like «obviously» and «clearly» just don't cut it, and the slightest
flaw in your logic renders your argument worthles
in your
logic renders your argument worthless.
Perhaps you didn't mean what you wrote, but that clearly implies evidence exists that points to
flaws in the reasoning and
logic specific to atheism.
If even one person
in the world can identify a
flaw in your
logic your proof is worthless.
If I weren't being logical and reasonable you should identify the
flaws in my
logic.
You didn't address what evidence atheists ignore that points to
flaws in their reasoning and
logic.
@russ: one major
flaw in your
logic... a person has to believe what you do to think something natural to most creatures
in the animal kingdom is a sin.
There are so many
flaws in your
logic that it's no wonder you can't even see them, it's like having so many holes
in Swiss cheese that you are left with just air but want to still try to convince people it's cheese.
Can you really not see the
flaws in your
logic when you say: «Saying that those fetuses are the womens because they are
in her is like saying we are our houses people because we live
in it.»
That his gran - daddy was a Muslim therefore he is a Muslin is so
flawed logic and a gross display of the prevalence of the ignorant
in this country.
How about they find religion to be seriously
flawed in logic and totally lacking
in evidence.
Almost every believer I have ever talked to wants to use the
logic of complex creations requiring a creator but fail to grasp the simple and unavoidable
flaw in that
logic which is that the super complex entlty it would take to design and build the universe would then by its own complexity require a more complex entlty to have created it and so on.
There are too many
flaws in your «
logic» to respond to.
And then of course, we have some
flaws in this
logic.
There is one
flaw in your
logic.
I'm not saying God doesn't exist, I'm just pointing out the
flaws in your
logic.
From his autopsy he concludes that the death was due to fundamental
flaws in its original «
logic.»
Or point out the
flaws in my
logic — that evolution, geology, big bang, etc. etc. disprove the creation myths.
Though the Ctatholics are definetly wrong there is something very
flawed with his
logic about pagan stories being bundled together they was huge part of the bible they was
in many places the hebrews came and went is it possible pagans knew the story of Abraham and Isaac of course I am sure word spread like wild fire not to mention is how do you know if they are pagan stories or true stories that the pagans decided to tell sounds to me like he just doesn't want to be held accountable.
I will continue to point out the
flaws in logic that are inherent
in religion, and I will continue to point out the bald - faced lies of christians.
You have, however, succesfully demonstrated the fundamental
flaws of religion: It rests on untestable assertions,
logic - defying presumptions and blind appeals to authority cobbled together
in an attempt to create a screen from genuine inquiry.
«ll human beings are spiritual — it's not a choice, it's how they were made» And that is the fundamental
flaw in your
logic.
Christianity, and
in fact any religion that believes
in a personal god / creator, has two fundamental
flaws that have absolutely nothing to do with science and everything to do with
logic, which incidentally forms the foundation for the only universal / objective truths of reality (putting aside the Cartesian dualism problem).
I always wonder why people like Live4him think they are able to recognize The Truth when they cant recognize the gaping
flaws in their
logic.
I would suggest to you, sincerely, that you not throw away the chance to know God
in an intimate and personal way and to have eternal life, on the basis of your deeply
flawed logic.
The Meno, Plato's only dialogue on the subject of education, features a title character whose failures to learn are more frequently the results of
flaws in his character than they are the results of lapses
in his
logic.
the next
flaw in your logic is athiests DO NOT BELIEVE IN GODS; thus how could we think we are something that we don't even believe i
in your
logic is athiests DO NOT BELIEVE
IN GODS; thus how could we think we are something that we don't even believe i
IN GODS; thus how could we think we are something that we don't even believe
inin?
this is the kind of
flawed logic that turns people into alkies
in the first place.
The watchmaker argument is
flawed in that equates something that does not occur
in nature, and applies the
logic of design and purpose onto nature
in a very arbitrary way.
Christian addresses seven
flaws in the atheists» arguments for the non-existence of «that Loser,» the «biggest fraud of all time, cosmic zero, ultimate no - show» — sexual liberty, reason and
logic, good works, art, converts to Christianity, the human family, and life issues.
The
flaw in your
logic is that morals and ethics evolved through the success of the group.
But
in the end, who wants to trust
in the finite, limited,
flawed logic of humans after all the pain and suffering human
logic has caused.
But we need to be able to demonstrate the
flaws in the
logic and to make a case for the objectivity that is missing.
No, you have a basic understanding that your bible is
flawed but take great leaps of faith to cover over the gaps
in logic and reason that allow you to continue the faulty conclusions of your religious peers who have been using the bible to control the uneducated masses for thousands of years.
You do not accept the scienctific theories and dismiss them, but readily accept the theoretical gods men created 2000 years ago... do you not see the
flaw in your
logic?
Economically, marriage may be convenient, but the idea that
in order to live a full and meaningful life a person must get and remain married is just
flawed logic.
M&C Saatchi chief strategy officer Justin Graham points to a fatal
flaw in Coke's
logic.
The other
flaw in the
logic about sacking Christiansen is the lack of available options at this time of year.
I do believe there are key
flaws in your
logic and would be interested
in seeing more support for your perspective... but if I phrased that
in an overly aggressive manner, I do apologize for that.