This is
flawed logic since each half needs to be treated as a separate event.
Not exact matches
Since your
logic is
flawed, I would guess Jesus and all the executives of the world are busy doing what they do best.
Now you could continue to say these silly things
since your out of excuses for your
flawed logic, but that would just make you look like even more of a joke wouldn't it?
Since you can not and admit to being unable to make a determination on the God issue, your
logic is fatally
flawed and thus your post is self - contradictory.
It's
flawed logic at best — Capcom have always made a good fist of the big N's consoles, for one — but has always struck a minor chord and has seemingly come to pass with the Nintendo 3DS, a handheld that has struggled with a dearth of decent games
since its launch.
If guilt by association were actually valid according to «the basic rules of
logic and reasoning,» as strong a case (or stronger) could easily be made for you, Joanne Nova (via Shell and ExxonMobil), being called a terrorist as for James Hansen (via UK writer Keith Farnish) being called a terrorist; I knew no one would call me on any
flaw in that reasoning,
since that is precisely the reasoning being used to smear Hansen.
I regard it as a fundamental
flaw in
logic to infer high confidence in attribution
since 1950, without understanding the warming in the early part of the 20th century and the mid century hiatus.
If you count papers which don't address the issue at all you could bring in hundreds of thousands of papers on quantum physics, stellar cartography, economics, sociiology, et cetera and claim that
since none of these take any position on global warming there is less than 1 % support for it... or any other subject you want to dismiss via blatantly
flawed logic.