Sentences with phrase «flawed papers from»

[DC: The «peer review corruption» I am most concerned about is that which allows publication of deeply flawed papers from the likes of lobby group allies like researchers Soon and Baliunas (Climate Research, back in 2003) or McLean et al (GRL, last year).]

Not exact matches

We believe that the flaws of other paper currencies stem directly from the flaws inherent in the dollar, which is to say, unlimited supply.

It may be ineffective at keeping papers with analytic or methodological flaws from being published, but it can be deadly effective at suppressing criticism of a dominant research paradigm.

This graphic depicts the carbon intensity of shipping wine from various global wine regions to key U.S. cities and bases its data on a seriously flawed, two - year - old working paper that is filled with untested assumptions, has not been peer reviewed, and does not accurately reflect the complexities of greenhouse gas emissions in the wine sector.

He also admitted and addressed some of the flaws in his paper — it contains «very few new ideas», and the compulsion that might be necessary for some of his proposals to have teeth isn't possible because «voluntary means voluntary» — but what was striking was his stress on mutuality; the importance of community; and the strength to society that comes from volunteering.

To make matters more complicated, several scientists, including Drosten, say the central conclusion of the NEJM paper — that the MERS virus jumped from a camel to a human at a Saudi farm — is flawed and most likely the result of lab contamination.

In a paper published earlier this year in the Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, researchers from Penn State University pointed out a flaw in alcohol studies based on large longitudinal study in the United Kingdom called the National Childhood Development Study.

As this paper from 2009 explains, the supposed link between dietary and serum cholesterol stems from studies that had fundamental design flaws, failed to separate the effects of cholesterol different types of fat intake, or were performed on animals that are obligate herbivores (hey there, rabbits!).

Ofqual's analysis of sample papers with existing, supposedly «current» papers (actually from a few years ago) and similar tests from international jurisdictions was flawed.

As soon as we receive your writing requirements, we find a suitable writer who can write your paper without any flaw and the writer prepares your paper from scratch.

Moreover, Marvelous-Essay.net commits to giving any our client an academic paper that is free from style mistakes, grammatical mistakes, or any other flaws that may «help» you to fail your grade.

The content in every custom essay you order from us is non-plagiarized, written in strict accordance with your initial instructions, and scrupulously double - checked with the aid of the advanced plagiarism checker honed to find flaws in all sorts of academic papers.

On paper, then, it's offering up a pretty good package for the price, looking a bit like Borderlands and playing like Gears of War, but this shooter has a few flaws holding it back from its true potential.

However, it is not foolproof — a deeply flawed paper can end up being published under a number of different potential circumstances: (i) the work is submitted to a journal outside the relevant field (e.g. a paper on paleoclimate submitted to a social science journal) where the reviewers are likely to be chosen from a pool of individuals lacking the expertise to properly review the paper, (ii) too few or too unqualified a set of reviewers are chosen by the editor, (iii) the reviewers or editor (or both) have agendas, and overlook flaws that invalidate the paper's conclusions, and (iv) the journal may process and publish so many papers that individual manuscripts occasionally do not get the editorial attention they deserve.

I did so, and in so doing pointed out a number of problems in the M&N paper (comparing the ensemble mean of the GCM simulations with a single realisation from the real world, and ignoring the fact that the single GCM realisations showed very similar levels of «contamination», misunderstandings of the relationships between model versions, continued use of a flawed experimental design etc.).

As we stated in the paper, this is a result from a single model and given that all models are flawed, it really needs to be reproduced by some other groups.

He went on to discuss how the original paper's sea - rise projection was, in his view, flawed, but also how the way it was described distracted from overall confidence about rising seas in a warming world.

I analyzed the Scafetta paper from an astronomical / physical perspective (I am an astronomer) in http://giannicomoretto.blogspot.com/2010/03/sole-e-clima.html, unfortunately in Italian, but also the mathematics is flawed, as shown here.

This viewpoint appears to have been driven into the IPCC by a strong desire for lower natural variability from the climate modelling community and was largely done off the back of the seriously flawed MBH paper.

But even from the misleading version of the quote, it's not hard to infer that Mann thought the paper was flawed.

Regarding the e-mail from Michael Mann to Andy Revkin, Mann's statements reflect his scientific judgment that the McIntyre and McKitrick (2005) paper was flawed.

What does happen, has happened, in the past with articles like the one Science published is not so very different in a number of ways from what Rud Istvan, Steve McIntyre and others have done in blogs — bluntly point out deficits, tactlessly remark on flaws and fault, explore unreservedly whether any facet associated with an article or paper weakens its arguments.

«Both [Fall et al. 2011 and Menne et al. 2010](and cited by Muller et al) do an analysis over a thirty year time period while the Muller et al paper uses data for comparison from 1950 — 2010... I see this as a basic failure in understanding the limitations of the siting survey we conducted on the USHCN, rendering the Muller et al paper conclusions highly uncertain, if not erroneous... I consider the paper fatally flawed as it now stands, and thus I recommend it be removed from publication consideration by JGR until such time that it can be reworked... it appears they have circumvented the scientific process in favor of PR.»

But whether or not the Spencer and Braswell paper (or the CERN) is true or flawed will not determine the outcome of this juvenile «food fight» to use an image from yesterday's posts.

What is to stop those other papers from being just as flawed?

First it's; «momentum is building behind the controversial view that the numbers don't add up» then «A rising chorus of literature in the world's best scientific journals and most prestigious opinion pages has argued the climate change math is flawed» and «For climate scientists, irritating questions from «sceptics» about the «pause» have now become peer - reviewed papers...» which is the intro for Michael Asten as the first quote for the article.

In a paper last year, Professor Robert Pindyck from the Massachusetts Institute Technology concluded the so - called integrated assessment models used to combine climate science with economics have «crucial flaws that make them close to useless as tools for policy analysis».

Quite possibly the biggest flaw in the paper (and there are many to choose from), is in their «natural» linear trend, which L&S describe thusly:

Even journal publisher Otto Kinne eventually admitted that the paper suffered from serious flaws, basically agreeing with its critics.

Apart from the paper's flaws, I suspect some of the backlash from these scientists is associated with the fact that this paper has not yet been peer reviewed, and is an integrative, interdisciplinary assessment that challenges the IPCC and other established assessment reports.

Trawling over possible flaws in a paper from 1990 as if that's the last word in a complex subject, I ask you with tears in my voice.

If somebody were to believe that scientific AGW was «significantly flawed» they would require very substantial evidence to overturn thousands of peer reviewed research papers from the world's top experts.

The most unforgiveable unethical behavior surrounding the entire issue of «hiding the decline» and similar biases in published research, is when climate change scientists who know about their — «cherry picking the data», — biased and selective presentation of all data pertinent to published paper conclusions, and — outright errors in their data and peer - reviewed papers, don't speak out loudly in the media outlets that have misled the general public in reporting about their flawed, misleading research, as well as, associated journals and professional societies, to stop politicians and government regulators from using their flawed and misleading research results to pass laws and regulations that have severe effects on the prosperity and quality of life of their fellow citizens of the US and the world.