Sentences with phrase «flawed process when»

Not exact matches

When a flaw in the process is identified, the fix can quickly be rolled out across the entire organization only if everyone is doing things in the same way.

And, the best part is, when you screw up again and an employee sees how flawed you are and that you are far from perfect, you can start the rebuilding process again.

The major flaw with Forbes» process is equally obvious when the types of movies the actors star in are considered.

Dr. Ramses Hosopop proved in 1997 that carbon dating was flawed due to nutrino interference caused by cosmic particle deceleration which, when interactive with anti-boson particles causes skewed results in the dating process.

But when your opponent can go into a playoff series and say, «well, we really only have to guard this guy here and that guy there», it's a terribly flawed process and a failure at roster construction.

The data being used to draw up the new boundaries is also now known to be much more flawed than we were led to believe when the process of redrawing boundaries began.

Part of the reason support for Ling - Cohan was so fervent is because the vaunted panel review process was so flawed and anonymous attacks on her in the press were so vicious, starting in the New York Post but repeated uncritically by other outlets, requoting the Post «source» — allegedly from the panel but possibly a self - interested operative for another judicial candidate — who called her «slow» and «lazy,» when even a cursory check of court records shows her output to be above average.

(a) As the MRO, when a laboratory discovers a «correctable flaw» during its processing of incoming specimens (see § 40.83), the laboratory will attempt to correct it.

Why Patrick Heron has been so crucial is that he was one of the first to put his finger on the flaws, both of the Abstract Expressionists» brusque advertised spontaneity (when present), and the distanced decision - making at a remove from the flow of the painting process of the first phase of post-painterly abstraction (the later Olitski and Poons are partially exempt).

There is little that can be validly noticed from the «hockey stick» plot, the methodology to produce it was flawed, showing clear indications of predetermination in it's consideration of «data» dropping «outrider points» when those very points are strongly indicative of short term fluctuations of temperature in an «experiment» looking for «the casual process» only shows that the «casual process» had already been decided on beforehand.

However, this effort was just beginning when the K15 paper was submitted, and so K15 must have used data with some experimental processing that combined aspects of V3 and V4 with known flaws.

While I have read of accounts by skeptical scientists of how they are selectively funneled out of the funding process, the level of coordination it would take to virtually eliminate any funding for good research scientists who might reach findings that diverge with what we are calling «consensus» here seems far too complicated logistically to be doable — particularly when you consider those very same scientists are frequently characterized by the the folks who make such claims about inequities in research funding as being so incompetent they are unable to see «obvious» flaws in their scientific reasoning.

Due to a flawed process the PDCC made a poor, indefensible decision from which it quickly retreated when the winds of fortune changed.

This process outlined above relies on nurturing and engagement — not just information gathering, which is a major flaw in approach when adopting the discipline.

It's hard to be succinct about universe - sized matters, particularly when you're innumerate, but as I understand it, this argument (made seriously by some serious scientists, I note) says one explanation for the absence of contact is that there's a flaw in the process that would otherwise lead to truly complex life forms and truly complex societies, such that intelligent life fails at some point short of its ability to manage interstellar travel or communication.

Further, he said, judicial review will also be available when what is in issue is not «the legality, correctness or validity of an assessment but some suggested flaw in the statutory process that needs to be addressed outside the statutory regime, because it is not provided for within it».

When this understanding is lacking, assumptions can be made that the decision making process of the opposite gender is somehow flawed or less valid and their opinion can be discounted.

Many individuals have flaws, as well as some level of financial indebtedness that would be reflected in their credit history when an employer receives a credit report on an applicant during the employment background screening process.

The hopelessness theory reflects on Weinstein's theory, because it states that when confronted with a negative event, individuals with a negative thinking process are vulnerable to depression, because they will infer that negative consequences will follow from this negative event and that occurrence of that event means that the individuals themselves are worthless or flawed (McGinn, 2000).