Sentences with phrase «flawed studies funded»

Well, the diet that I recommend usually freaks people out initially, but it's rooted in sound science and facts, and not influenced by flawed studies funded by companies with ulterior motives.

The thing is, that argument was based on a flawed study funded by disposable diaper manufacturers.

Not exact matches

«It's ironic FDA would choose to ignore dozens of studies funded by [the National Institutes of Health]-- this country's best scientists — and instead rely on flawed studies from industry.»

As a citizen of the United States and a taxpayer, and as a practicing biomedical applied statistician, I am especially concerned about the possibility that the funding garnered for such potentially flawed studies is detracting from other groups» ability to obtain funding to perform valid research in the valuable arena of personalized medicine.

«Even in some of the industry - funded studies, genistein was shown to cause reproductive toxicity,» said Elbek, «but the panel chose to focus on perceived flaws in these studies as a way of dismissing them.»

Unfortunately, little research money is available for researchers to study these theories; most research on heart disease is funded through the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, which is firmly committed to the flawed hypothesis that cholesterol and saturated fat cause heart disease.

In an earlier email, Balderson's legislative aide provided Gentil with a copy of a deeply flawed and biased study by Strata Policy and the Institute for Political Economy at Utah State University, both of which have funded by the Koch brothers.

As part of its justification, the administration cites this deficient fossil fuel - funded study as a reason for the CPP rollback — the same study whose flaws are pointed out below.

The International Policy Network, funded by among others ExxonMobil, will publish its long - awaited study, claiming that the science warning of an environmental disaster caused by climate change is «fatally flawed».

Derrick Sontag apparently only cited a range of debunked studies (the «Spanish» study and the flawed Beacon Hill report) and information from Koch - funded interests like the Institute for Energy Research and «State Budget Solutions,» a project of several State Policy Network groups including ALEC and the Mercatus Center, a think tank founded and heavily - funded by the Kochs.

Well, it looks like the press release was carefully worded, and referring back to Anthony Watts article on his blog which is criticized at the beginning of the RC article, i see no wrong claim there... Hiss main argument is written in bold: «The IPCC is under scrutiny for various data inaccuracies, including its claim — based on a flawed World Wildlife Fund study — that up to 40 % of the Amazonian forests could react drastically and be replaced by savannas from even a slight reduction in rainfall.»