Sentences with phrase «flaws in the argument in»

There's flaws in the argument in claiming a piece of technology is a long term investment.

Not exact matches

The biggest flaw in Shafer's argument is that it assumes newspapers failed to succeed at digital despite trying their hardest to adapt.

A parade of reports and experts explained away high house prices and debt levels with many of the same arguments we hear today in Canada — yes, prices are way up compared to rents, but the analysis is built on flawed data; debt levels are high, but so are house prices, which minimizes the risk; America's demographics support the boom; and then the classic: There'll be a soft landing.

However, one of the other signers of the declaration, Thomas McKean, denied the July 4th signing date and backed it up by illustrating a glaring flaw in Jefferson's, Adams», and Franklin's argument — namely, that most of the signers were not members of congress on July 4th and thus wouldn't have been there to sign it.

Yet critics point to flaws in this argument that threaten to stunt rather than fuel China's growth.

«I think Taylor is brilliant but I think that's sort of a flawed argument,» Carter said during an interview at an annual conference in San Francisco hosted by tech news site TechCrunch.

Americans for Annuity Protection has engaged in active outreach to leaders of influence to establish the argument that the DOL's fiduciary rule should be returned because of the analysis performed by the department is flawed, inconclusive and arbitrary; it is not compatible with the Uniform Security Law or established insurance law, and the law has potential conflict with the Dodd - Frank requirements to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on reviewing a uniform fiduciary standard.

Then there's what I see as a major conceptual flaw in the opposing arguments I heard today: Fed policy is presented as all costs, no benefits.

I haven't gotten anything wrong, and I and others have already pointed out the philosophical flaws in the argument.

Their religious symbol should have no effect on you if you have no faith in the religion, the argument is entirely flawed and petty.

That is the flaw in your argument, you ascribe something which you know or should know can't be ascribed.

The flaw in your thinking is that your argument is only valid when both people share the same belief system, which is not the case here.

@snowboarder — I am not religious at all, but I target with «Truth» that there is a flaw in your argument.

There's one fatal flaw in your argument.

In other words, I can articulate the flaws in your arguments but you can't identify the flaws in minIn other words, I can articulate the flaws in your arguments but you can't identify the flaws in minin your arguments but you can't identify the flaws in minin mine.

In mathematics, arguments like «obviously» and «clearly» just don't cut it, and the slightest flaw in your logic renders your argument worthlesIn mathematics, arguments like «obviously» and «clearly» just don't cut it, and the slightest flaw in your logic renders your argument worthlesin your logic renders your argument worthless.

But there is even a flaw in that argument.

Another flaw in your argument is in ignoring the differences in populations and technologies.

ALL of your arguments are flawed in the same way (see No True Scotsman Fallacy).

Reese pointed out a flaw in the bishops» argument that employers who feel their conscience was violated by providing contraception coverage should be exempted from the law.

Which is exactly why every time you post the garbage you learned in those classes, it gets destroyed, showing the flaws in the basic premises, destroying the integrity of the argument.

your role now as atheist, is to be the opposing argumenter for the modern day change process or evolution of the present religion from monotheism which you have shown in your arguments to be flawed so that the future faithfuls will shift to the ultra modern faith called PANTHROTHEISM - the synthesis of theistic monotheism vs.humanistic atheism.I suggest to you to be more aggressive and conscise in your arguments, God needs you

There are so many flawed and tired arguments about religion flying around in these comments.

There are many flaws in this argument.

You have every right to believe in your God, you have every right to present logically flawed arguments.

I'm showing as Alias does and as C.S. Lewis taught us in the 1930's that people who pine for a «perfectly just world» as evidence for God, ala DD, have a flawed argument.

If you have evidence that science leads to a god, or flaws in my arguments, feel free to post them.

Hence some aethiest stop sounding logical once you point out any flaws in their arguments because at this point their merely defending their beliefs and not really trying to have some sort of logical discussion.

However, I willingly concede that there is an important flaw in my argument.

Hence some believers stop sounding logical once you point out any flaws in their arguments because at this point their merely defending their beliefs and not really trying to have some sort of logical discussion.

Secondly, you are doing the classical Christian Apologetics move by attempting to take a flaw in your position and ask for the other side to make your argument for you.

so this is why you believe in god... just in case??? listen, its a stupid argument because its based around a flawed god concept and according to you, god can not be flawed, right?

Indeed, they are likely to conclude that we hardly need a philosopher of Anscombe's status to disprove Lewis; for Wilson writes that «any dispassionate reader can at once see many flaws in Lewis's arguments here.»

But both are fitting enterprises of public theology in the political mode, however flawed the justifying arguments may be.

not only does this author abuse the scripture, he points out the «pick and choose» flaws in many of these arguments... and then goes on to only use one verse himself... LOL this guy should right Obama's speeches.

leave it to atheists to focus on small matters like consistency... sign of a weak argument pointing out flaws in The Unalterable Word of the Almighty!

This feeling was shared by many who pointed out flaws in Dawkins» arguments or, at the very least, questioned the certainty the scientist holds that all religion is a load of rubbish.

So - what if they accept flaws in their argument (which I usually get them to do), they ignore the flaws (because, as they say, I have the burden of proof), and begin their arguments on the offensive.

Corrington documented the way the female has been excluded from the personae of the deity in Christianity, detailing the numerous arguments that present the female nature as flawed and limited.

But these formal flaws in Taylor's argument are not the main difficulty of the book.

With all due respect, the contradiction is a self evident flaw in an argument.

The watchmaker argument is flawed in that equates something that does not occur in nature, and applies the logic of design and purpose onto nature in a very arbitrary way.

Your argument is flawed, and I wish you luck in your new life as a ladybug.

Christian addresses seven flaws in the atheists» arguments for the non-existence of «that Loser,» the «biggest fraud of all time, cosmic zero, ultimate no - show» — sexual liberty, reason and logic, good works, art, converts to Christianity, the human family, and life issues.

He keeps making this same flawed argument, like his other flawed arguments, over and over in hopes that his audience will get tired of giving the routine refutation and let his comments slide, which he takes as a «win», also like Craig.

So your argument being in a all white world is flawed.

There are so many flaws in this argument.

Argumentum ad hominem is an attempt to refute an argument by pointing out flaws in the person delivering the argument, rather than pointing out flaws in the argument itself.

But Radner has also developed an argument for why it is important to stay in what he sees as a deeply flawed church.

So any argument started from the premise of «perfect» or «imperfect» is a flawed one in my opinion.