There are no singular gods in the Old or New Testament, nor any reason to assume they were anything more than
flesh and blood men.
The imagination which was supposed to possess universal qualities capable of inspiring
flesh and blood men of all lands and races to enter into a common faith turns out to be a specific American imagination.
- The American Indians are descended from Jews who sailed to America in 600BC - God is
a flesh and blood man and had physical relations with Mary to create Jesus - Jesus and Satan are brothers - Mormon men can become gods and live on their own planet - Joseph Smith met God and Jesus in person, and God told him all other Christian faiths were an «abomination» - Joseph Smith used magic glasses and his magic treasure seeking hat to create the Book of Mormon
It quite clearly can not mean that
this flesh and blood man Jesus existed before the creation of the world.
John quite certainly would have regarded with horror any line of thought which evaporated the historical,
flesh and blood man Jesus out of Christianity.
The defendants also believed that a legal distinction could be drawn between their name as written on their indictment and their true identity as a «
flesh and blood man.»
Not exact matches
His further explanation of this cryptic principle would alienate many who couldn't grasp what they saw as madness: a
man calling upon them to eat his
flesh and drink his
blood.
You cant debate God... you cant use logic to explain God... You cant use your small finite mind to try
and explain away an infinite God... Man is flesh and blood but man has a spirit and some things can only be received and revealed thru spirit... And what you do nt see is actually more real than what you can observe with your five senses... And BTW I did nt say religion i said God... Religion is man made tradition... God is real... develop a personal relationship with the one who created you and gave you life... God has a purpose for your life
and explain away an infinite God...
Man is flesh and blood but man has a spirit and some things can only be received and revealed thru spirit... And what you do nt see is actually more real than what you can observe with your five senses... And BTW I did nt say religion i said God... Religion is man made tradition... God is real... develop a personal relationship with the one who created you and gave you life... God has a purpose for your life
Man is
flesh and blood but man has a spirit and some things can only be received and revealed thru spirit... And what you do nt see is actually more real than what you can observe with your five senses... And BTW I did nt say religion i said God... Religion is man made tradition... God is real... develop a personal relationship with the one who created you and gave you life... God has a purpose for your life
and blood but
man has a spirit and some things can only be received and revealed thru spirit... And what you do nt see is actually more real than what you can observe with your five senses... And BTW I did nt say religion i said God... Religion is man made tradition... God is real... develop a personal relationship with the one who created you and gave you life... God has a purpose for your life
man has a spirit
and some things can only be received and revealed thru spirit... And what you do nt see is actually more real than what you can observe with your five senses... And BTW I did nt say religion i said God... Religion is man made tradition... God is real... develop a personal relationship with the one who created you and gave you life... God has a purpose for your life
and some things can only be received
and revealed thru spirit... And what you do nt see is actually more real than what you can observe with your five senses... And BTW I did nt say religion i said God... Religion is man made tradition... God is real... develop a personal relationship with the one who created you and gave you life... God has a purpose for your life
and revealed thru spirit...
And what you do nt see is actually more real than what you can observe with your five senses... And BTW I did nt say religion i said God... Religion is man made tradition... God is real... develop a personal relationship with the one who created you and gave you life... God has a purpose for your life
And what you do nt see is actually more real than what you can observe with your five senses...
And BTW I did nt say religion i said God... Religion is man made tradition... God is real... develop a personal relationship with the one who created you and gave you life... God has a purpose for your life
And BTW I did nt say religion i said God... Religion is
man made tradition... God is real... develop a personal relationship with the one who created you and gave you life... God has a purpose for your life
man made tradition... God is real... develop a personal relationship with the one who created you
and gave you life... God has a purpose for your life
and gave you life... God has a purpose for your life...
Masculinity, on the other hand, expresses the other half of the mystery, standing for «The Son of
Man» who brings
and prompts that life through his own
flesh and blood.
This, of course, is not to say he is not rightly esteemed truly human, a
man of
flesh and blood with the peculiar Biblical force of that phrase; indeed it might be claimed that the very stress laid on the limited character of his experience makes us more vividly aware of the reality of his human nature.
(I Corinthians 10:16 - 21) Was this the meaning of the Fourth Gospel also when it put on the lips of Jesus words of high sacramental import — «Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the
flesh of the Son of
man and drink his
blood, ye have not life in yourselves.
Then remember, in the first creation of
man, it was Adam,
and Eve, not of the same kind, or gender, but no one can even begin to judge another if they are of
flesh,
and blood, other than the Almighty Creator YHWH.
But that night all I saw was a
flesh -
and -
blood man who had just had his heart split open with grief.
Yet according to John's Gospel, Jesus said: «Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the
flesh of the Son of
man and drink his
blood, you have no life in you; he who eats my
flesh and drinks my
blood has eternal life» (6:53 f.).
Jesus (reaching verse 53): so it is; I say to you: unless you eat the
flesh of the Son of
Man and drink his
blood, you do not have life within you.
Here's a thought: rather than following a group of
men who play with little boys or believing in a religion which has you eating
flesh and drinking
blood every sabath or believing in a divine being that calls for you to stone disobedient children, why don't you simply think for yourself.
Gen 15:4 the LORD came to him [ME]: «This
man will not be your [MY] heir, but a son who is your [MY] own
flesh and blood will be your [MY] heir.»
«Unless you eat the
flesh and drink the
blood of the Son of
Man you will not have life in you» (Jn 6:53).
First of all, because it is not customary, but horrible, for
men to eat human
flesh,
and to drink
blood.»
Jesus was a
man of
flesh and blood, like any of us.
Christ Jesus, who is eternally begotten of the Father, is begotten in time of the Holy Spirit,
and takes on our own
flesh and blood «not out of human stock, or urge of the
flesh, or will of
man, but of God» (Jn 1, 13).
«He [Joseph of Aramathea] is certainly historical; we know his position
and his birthplace; he makes himself felt, in the gospel narratives, as a
man of
flesh and blood.»
While Paul's thought is by no means always clear,
and perhaps from letter to letter not always exactly the same, it is nevertheless certain that his concept of resurrection can be clearly distinguished from that of the traditional «bodily resurrection».27 Paul does not speak in terms of the «same body» but rather in terms of a new body, whether it be a «spiritual body», 28 «the likeness of the heavenly
man», 29 «a house not made by human hands, eternal
and in heaven», 30 or, a «new body put on» over the old.31 In using various figures of speech to distinguish between the present body of
flesh and blood and the future resurrection body, he seems to be thinking of both bodies as the externals which clothe the spirit
and without which we should «find ourselves naked».32 But he freely confesses that the «earthly frame that houses us today ’33 may, like the seed,
and man of dust, be destroyed, but the «heavenly habitation», which the believer longs to put on, is already waiting in the heavenly realm, for it is eternal by nature.
Paul clearly states that we wrestle not against
flesh and blood, but against principalities in high places; He is suppose to be setting a principal
and he is in fact destroying the thing that God stand for, serving the
flesh and the creation more than the creator who is blessed forever;
Man will always have a battle between
flesh and spirit; he is more
flesh than spirit ever in his dress muscles
and tight shirts; which has no place in the spirit;» dealing with matters of the holy ghost «he can speck it but he can «t live it; which is the trouble with a lot of modern day Christians; do as i say not as i do... old fashion parents had the same concept, its not just Eddie he got caught, he was just falling weak to the
flesh and his own desires; only thing is, he is responsible for the souls of those under his leadership; He must answer
and atone to God for those actions, you think for a moment we are being hard on him; God has a way of letting us know when we are wrong that lets us know we need to change.
Israel had abandoned the gods of ancient
man in favor of the YHWH who addressed them in history,
and now in the Israelite human scene there appeared a
man who not only spoke the Word of God but who embodied it in
flesh and blood.
What is their deduction of metaphysical attributes but a shuffling
and matching of pedantic dictionary - adjectives, aloof from morals, aloof from human needs, something that might be worked out from the mere word «God» by one of those logical machines of wood
and brass which recent ingenuity has contrived as well as by a
man of
flesh and blood.
It means that Jesus elevates the relationship between a
man and a woman in the order of creation, making it into a
flesh and blood living symbol of His love for His Church, «a sign of a sacred thing.»
For the Jewish rabbis
and for the early Christian theologians «Adam» is a prophetic image of the messianic Son of
Man, which means that Christ is prophesied
and prefigured not just in the age of innocence before sin, but in the being, in the very
flesh and blood of Adam before he fell.
This means eating the
flesh and drinking the
blood of the Son of
Man.
Look at the first line, those that God called He gives the ability to be sons of God,
and its not by any will of
man or
flesh or
blood but by His will.
no, its no more a sin than eating buggers, just stop beating up on oneself, if you are in love with YHWH,
and do His law, the 10 commandments, just as David did, plenty of wrong in his life, but he prayed,
and he prayed, he also loved YHWH so much, he was loyal,
and loving to YHWH, so YHWH chose him,
and his seed, do the law of righteousness, the commandments,
and pray,
and pray, love YHWH with all of you heart,
and no other
man made of
flesh,
and blood can judge anyone else, only YHWH can, He has the complete authority,
and as long as you have a relationship deep with Him, He knows.
Here was Borges next to me, the jovial
man of
flesh and blood I had searched for,
and I was talking text instead of
man.
53 Then Jesus said to them, «Most assuredly, I say to you, unless you eat the
flesh of the Son of
Man and drink His
blood, you have no life in you.
Surrounded by up -
and - coming critics wearing a variety of bright yellow ties (it was rumored that Borges, blind for over 20 years, could still see patches of yellow), he clutched
and caressed a favorite cane, offering few insights into himself, the
man of
flesh and blood.
In John it means this concrete
man of
flesh and blood — this
man, Jesus, who is also Son of God.
The key to John's achievement is the tension between»... unless you eat the
flesh of the Son of
man and drink his
blood, you have no life in you» (6:53)
and «It is the spirit that gives life, the
flesh is of no avail» (6:63).
The Son of God was truly born into the
flesh, into the
blood and sweat of
man.
His long discourse on the importance of eating the
flesh and drinking the
blood of the Son of
Man ends with many of his followers walking away
and those who stay do so out of resignation more than enthusiasm (John 6:52 - 68).
When it says «unless you eat the
flesh of the son of
man and drink his
blood you shall not have life within you»
and «my
flesh is true food... my
blood is true drink»
and «this is my body... This is my
blood» I trust Jesus meant what he said.
(11)
Man We did create from a quintessence (of clay); (12) Then We placed him as (a drop of) sperm in a place of rest firmly fixed; (13) Then We made the sperm into a clot of congealed
blood; then of that clot We made a (foetus) lump; then We made out of that lump bones
and clothed the bones with
flesh; then We developed out of it another creature: so blessed be Allah, the Best to create!
The «symbol» Jesus Christ takes on
flesh and blood, which only twice in the libretto is conceptualized: Mary Magdelene
and Judas alone realize «He's a
man, he's just a
man,» though there is something about him, some hidden
and mysterious (parabolic?)
No
man in a healthy sexual relationship would choose porn over bonking his
flesh -
and -
blood partner, says San Francisco Bay Area sex therapist
and America's War On Sex: The Attack on Law, Lust, & Liberty author Marty Klein.
He's the kind of hero John Wayne played in his famous westerns... clear - eyed honesty, strength of character, courageous compassion... only in a real - life,
flesh -
and -
blood man of honor, decency,
and integrity... Read more
A new father suddenly has his own
flesh and blood that he cares for
and loves,
and for most
men, they would not change a thing.
And even though we know that a man sitting on the next bar stool can easily lie, we still believe that what happens in the digital world has less veracity than flesh - and - blood encounters — and that the relationships that arise online are of inferior quali
And even though we know that a
man sitting on the next bar stool can easily lie, we still believe that what happens in the digital world has less veracity than
flesh -
and - blood encounters — and that the relationships that arise online are of inferior quali
and -
blood encounters —
and that the relationships that arise online are of inferior quali
and that the relationships that arise online are of inferior quality.
VIOLENCE / GORE 7 - Native Americans ride on horseback toward a house where a
man arms himself
and a woman with three children runs away; the
man opens fire on the riders
and they shoot back hitting him in the leg (
blood spurts), then shooting him in the back with an arrow
and one rider scalps him (we see the knife crossing the
flesh and blood pours); the woman runs with the children
and one young girl is shot (
blood spurts), the other young girl is shot (
blood splatters)
and the infant in the woman's arms is shot (
blood splatters).
Bullets ripping through
flesh,
blood flowing in currents, limbs blown off, lives snuffed out in split seconds,
and wave after wave of young
men mowed down
and butchered up as the events of June 6, 1944 took place.
A
man with a machete hacks another
man to death; we see
blood spray
and we hear thuds as the blade hits the victim
and squishes of
blood and flesh.
Flesh and Blood: A
man just released from prison returns home to his impoverished neighborhood in Philadelphia
and attempts to rebuild his life
and reintegrate into the community, but he struggles with staying sober, forging a bond with his half - brother,
and mending a strained relationship with his mother.
If only the sole purpose of Churchill weren't to take ol' Winnie off the plinth
and make him seem like a little more of a
flesh -
and -
blood man — a goal the movie fails on account of being inert, decorous,
and almost absurdly repetitive.