Sentences with phrase «flesh and blood on»

Only Carey Mulligan struggles, in the role of Daisy, the woman torn between the two men; a cipher on the page, she's not easily rendered as flesh and blood on the screen, even by an actress of Mulligan's skill.

What if Bay had the talent to put flesh and blood on the story hidden in the bowels of Ehrten Kruger's script?

I find it fascinating when writers and directors and even producers of films about real people in the Bible read into what the people were like and how they fill in the gaps of the dialog, some I like, others I disagree with, but it allows me to put flesh and blood on their bones.

Not exact matches

On some level you have to remember that you're just a flesh and blood human, the rules do apply to you, and you can't cook rice in 10 minutes.

Writers on Grecian mythology relate that Ceres, the goddess of corn, gave her flesh to eat, and that Bacchus, the God of wine, gave blood to drink.»

He said He would build His church on those getting the understanding «NOT» from «Flesh and Blood» and this would be the large rock (Petra) of which Simon had become a small rock (Petros or Peter).

17:11 For the life of the flesh is in the blood, and I have given it for you on the altar to make atonement for your souls, for it is the blood that makes atonement by the life.

This is not founded on flesh and blood but on the will ofour Father in heaven.

Masculinity, on the other hand, expresses the other half of the mystery, standing for «The Son of Man» who brings and prompts that life through his own flesh and blood.

The very truth that God put on flesh and blood and moved into the neighbourhood through birth, even — especially — that experience of birth, now showing us what it means to be truly human.

This, of course, is not to say he is not rightly esteemed truly human, a man of flesh and blood with the peculiar Biblical force of that phrase; indeed it might be claimed that the very stress laid on the limited character of his experience makes us more vividly aware of the reality of his human nature.

(Cf. I Samuel 14:33 - 35) There was no order of hereditary priests, and the sacrifices, long after the settlement in Canaan, were apparently few in kind and simple in observance principally the peace - offering, where the fat and blood were given to Yahweh and the people feasted on the flesh, and the burnt - offering, where the whole animal was burned upon the altar.

Instead of seeing that we are all brothers and sisters on this earth and that our struggle is not against flesh and blood, we create false divisions based on skin color, cultural traditions, religious preferences, and invisible geographical boundaries called «borders.»

And yet the new form of existence, the «spiritual body» (that is, a body made for life on a different plane of existence, life with the risen Christ), is not entirely unrelated to the body of flesh and bloAnd yet the new form of existence, the «spiritual body» (that is, a body made for life on a different plane of existence, life with the risen Christ), is not entirely unrelated to the body of flesh and bloand blood.

(I Corinthians 10:16 - 21) Was this the meaning of the Fourth Gospel also when it put on the lips of Jesus words of high sacramental import — «Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, ye have not life in yourselves.

The Message says it best in John 1:14 - «The Word put on flesh and blood, and moved into the neighborhood.»

At Advent we remember that God will make good on His promise to redeem this screwed up world, even if He has to squeeze Himself into flesh and blood to do it.

Reading this verse seems to say we are saved when we believe and that once saved we may which implies either to continue to believe or continue to live our lives for us though preferably it is best to follow Christ with all our heart because if we walk according to the flesh satan has the opportunity to destroy our lives through the consequences of sin till we repent.Whereas if we walk in righteousness we are covered under the blood of Christ and protected from satans influence though he can oppress us he is on Gods leash as God is sovereign and in this way satan is used to perfect our faith and draw us closer to Christ.

On the other hand drinking wine and pretending its blood and eating wafers and pretending they are flesh is not silly at all.

Because through our natural and intelligent (blood and flesh) understanding we will impose JESUS Christ on ourselves and others.

I have an idea: let's worship a Zombie on a Stick and show reverence to It by pretending to eat his flesh and drink his blood, and celebrate his birth by giving cheap Chinese garbage purchased at Walmart to our friends.

And He will prove you wrong, if he has to show you the scars on His hands where the nails went through His flesh and His blood poured out till He died for yAnd He will prove you wrong, if he has to show you the scars on His hands where the nails went through His flesh and His blood poured out till He died for yand His blood poured out till He died for you.

(verse 54) Whoever gnaws on my flesh and slurps up my blood I will raise him on the last day.

Christ Jesus, who is eternally begotten of the Father, is begotten in time of the Holy Spirit, and takes on our own flesh and blood «not out of human stock, or urge of the flesh, or will of man, but of God» (Jn 1, 13).

Of course, there are things we can be unified on with people who do not follow Jesus, for Paul wrote that our struggle is not against flesh and blood, which means that if we find ourselves struggling with flesh and blood, we have been tricked into fighting the wrong thing.

While Paul's thought is by no means always clear, and perhaps from letter to letter not always exactly the same, it is nevertheless certain that his concept of resurrection can be clearly distinguished from that of the traditional «bodily resurrection».27 Paul does not speak in terms of the «same body» but rather in terms of a new body, whether it be a «spiritual body», 28 «the likeness of the heavenly man», 29 «a house not made by human hands, eternal and in heaven», 30 or, a «new body put on» over the old.31 In using various figures of speech to distinguish between the present body of flesh and blood and the future resurrection body, he seems to be thinking of both bodies as the externals which clothe the spirit and without which we should «find ourselves naked».32 But he freely confesses that the «earthly frame that houses us today ’33 may, like the seed, and man of dust, be destroyed, but the «heavenly habitation», which the believer longs to put on, is already waiting in the heavenly realm, for it is eternal by nature.

Paul clearly states that we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities in high places; He is suppose to be setting a principal and he is in fact destroying the thing that God stand for, serving the flesh and the creation more than the creator who is blessed forever; Man will always have a battle between flesh and spirit; he is more flesh than spirit ever in his dress muscles and tight shirts; which has no place in the spirit;» dealing with matters of the holy ghost «he can speck it but he can «t live it; which is the trouble with a lot of modern day Christians; do as i say not as i do... old fashion parents had the same concept, its not just Eddie he got caught, he was just falling weak to the flesh and his own desires; only thing is, he is responsible for the souls of those under his leadership; He must answer and atone to God for those actions, you think for a moment we are being hard on him; God has a way of letting us know when we are wrong that lets us know we need to change.

37 Because his arguments were frequently based on Holy Scripture, he was a little embarrassed by Paul's words which declared that «flesh and blood shall not inherit the kingdom of God».

As John B. Cobb, Jr. has convincingly demonstrated, 5 White - head's «principle of concretion» only gradually takes on flesh and blood as he subjects his conception of God to the categoreal obligations of his own metaphysical vision during the years 1924 - 1929.

In the wonder and ultimate mystery of love, spiritual truths come alive; they take on flesh - and - blood reality by being incarnated in persons.

The first one to hammer out anything like a theology of the Christian faith was Paul, and curiously enough he appears never to have met the flesh and blood Jesus of Nazareth, let alone to have heard his teaching on the «Kingdom of God» direct from his lips.

no, its no more a sin than eating buggers, just stop beating up on oneself, if you are in love with YHWH, and do His law, the 10 commandments, just as David did, plenty of wrong in his life, but he prayed, and he prayed, he also loved YHWH so much, he was loyal, and loving to YHWH, so YHWH chose him, and his seed, do the law of righteousness, the commandments, and pray, and pray, love YHWH with all of you heart, and no other man made of flesh, and blood can judge anyone else, only YHWH can, He has the complete authority, and as long as you have a relationship deep with Him, He knows.

Jesus went on to say, «He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me and I in him».

- The American Indians are descended from Jews who sailed to America in 600BC - God is a flesh and blood man and had physical relations with Mary to create Jesus - Jesus and Satan are brothers - Mormon men can become gods and live on their own planet - Joseph Smith met God and Jesus in person, and God told him all other Christian faiths were an «abomination» - Joseph Smith used magic glasses and his magic treasure seeking hat to create the Book of Mormon

... Leviticus 17:11 «For the life of the flesh is in the blood, and I have given it to you on the altar to make atonement for your souls; for it is the blood by reason of the life that makes atonement (I do get the inference that bringing other things up, opens up a whole new can of worms every time, so to speak); on the other hand, it is true today that God does not want our blood.

Both versions, Palestinian and Hellenistic, imply an antithesis — he who was crucified on the accursed tree is nevertheless Messiah: Jesus, a figure of flesh and blood, is nevertheless Lord.

His long discourse on the importance of eating the flesh and drinking the blood of the Son of Man ends with many of his followers walking away and those who stay do so out of resignation more than enthusiasm (John 6:52 - 68).

No matter how well they explain this to me, I still have this horrific image of crowds of people jumping on jesus to devour his flesh and drink his blood.

Clearly partaking of christs blood and flesh to absolve their sins on a weekly basis isnt enough for you people.

However, to travel the road out of debt, you'll need flesh and blood people cheering you on.

# CANNIBALISM AND VAMPIRISM — Isaiah 49:26 «I [God] will make your oppressors eat their own flesh; they will be drunk on their own blood, as with wine.

The «symbol» Jesus Christ takes on flesh and blood, which only twice in the libretto is conceptualized: Mary Magdelene and Judas alone realize «He's a man, he's just a man,» though there is something about him, some hidden and mysterious (parabolic?)

He was falsely accused, arrested, slapped, spit on, had His beard pulled out of His face, sent to court where though no guilt was found was sentenced to be beaten to within an inch of HIs life, struck with rods, whipped with a weapon that had sharp bones and different pieces tore large chuncks of flesh off, drug back to court wearing a robe which when the blood dried to it became its own bit of torture, the first beating not good enough so sentenced to die, had a crown of thorns pressed down into his skull causing much more blood loss, beaten some more, forced to carry an extremely heavy wood beam as he marched toward His death, whipped and beaten along the way, had huge nails driven through His hands and feet, and had a shoulder separated.

No man in a healthy sexual relationship would choose porn over bonking his flesh - and - blood partner, says San Francisco Bay Area sex therapist and America's War On Sex: The Attack on Law, Lust, & Liberty author Marty KleiOn Sex: The Attack on Law, Lust, & Liberty author Marty Kleion Law, Lust, & Liberty author Marty Klein.

A Labour government will insist on the OTs and CDs introducing central, publicly accessible registers of the millions of people who are the real, flesh - and - blood owners of the companies they host.

Here celluloid's gift for facsimile achieved its ultimate expression, the complete transmutation of reality into illusion, as three - dimensional flesh - and - blood beings were transformed into two - dimensional ghosts shimmering on a screen.

Coming soon to an operating room near you: a remote - controlled robot operates on a flesh - and - blood patient while — miles away — the human surgeon deftly cuts with virtual scalpels.

If you're in the presence of others, put all screens away and focus on the opportunity to connect in conversation with the actual, flesh - and - blood human beings who sit in front of you (as opposed to the virtual ones that tend to populate more and more of our connections).

To help elaborate on this I have fleshed out what various scenarios would look like in terms of body fat, insulin levels and energy in the blood (i.e. glucose, ketones and free fatty acids) in the table below.

Where the most successful of the F13s hang their hat, creating a team of characters that are interesting and at least partially fleshed out, The New Blood instead focuses on developing a few smaller threads.