The Utah State Office of Education (USOE) proposes to request two amendments to the State's approved ESEA
flexibility waiver request.
Not exact matches
Based on this input, the 2015 Position Paper does not
request a
waiver, but rather increased funding paired with commonsense
flexibility to restore the financial stability of school meal programs and allow for menu improvements that can entice students back to healthy school meals.
The U.S. Department of Education on Thursday denied a
request by the state's top education official to extend a
flexibility waiver under the No Child Left Behind Act, a decision that will place restrictions on nearly $ 30 million in annual federal funding for local school districts beginning with the 2015 - 2016 school year.
7 ESEA
Waiver Flexibility Request, U.S. Department of Education, revised February 10, 2012, accessed August 27, 2013, available at http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/esea-
flexibility/index.html.
Four state education officials spoke about their states»
waiver requests, allowing them more
flexibility with meeting No Child Left Behind goals.
For a full listing of the
waivers granted to Utah please see Utah's approved
flexibility request at http://schools.utah.gov/data/Educational-Data/Accountability-School-Performance/Utah-ESEA-
Flexibility-
Request.aspx
In August of 2014 the Utah State Board of Education approved the
request that was recently granted for a one year extension of the
flexibility waiver.
Shortly after the Obama administration announced that it's providing NCLB
waivers to all 11 states that have applied for such
flexibility to date, 26 additional states and the District of Columbia submitted their own
waiver applications in the second round of
requests.
The Texas
waiver request is of particular interest to education leaders and policy experts, not only because of the state's considerable student population, but also because Texas has suggested that it would apply for a
waiver without agreeing to all of the college - and career - readiness, school improvement, and teacher effectiveness reforms that the department is requiring in exchange for
flexibility on key components of the law.
Pennsylvania, Texas, and Wyoming recently submitted No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
waiver requests to the U.S. Department of Education, meaning 47 states have now
requested flexibility from the law's most onerous requirements.
Department of Educations Extends Transition
Flexibility Waivers for StatesThe Department of Education will consider, on a state - by - state basis, requests for flexibility in two areas: the timeline for using results of teacher and principal evaluation and support systems that meet the requirements of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) flexibility for personnel decisions, and field testing new assessments aligned to college - and career - ready
Flexibility Waivers for StatesThe Department of Education will consider, on a state - by - state basis,
requests for
flexibility in two areas: the timeline for using results of teacher and principal evaluation and support systems that meet the requirements of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) flexibility for personnel decisions, and field testing new assessments aligned to college - and career - ready
flexibility in two areas: the timeline for using results of teacher and principal evaluation and support systems that meet the requirements of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA)
flexibility for personnel decisions, and field testing new assessments aligned to college - and career - ready
flexibility for personnel decisions, and field testing new assessments aligned to college - and career - ready standards.
Taking into account the comments of the peer reviewers, we will review
requests for this
flexibility and, if appropriate, grant
waivers through the 2013 − 2014 school year, after which time an SEA may
request an extension of the
flexibility.
I invite each interested SEA to
request this
flexibility pursuant to the authority in section 9401 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA), which allows me to waive, with certain exceptions, any statutory or regulatory requirement of the ESEA for an SEA that receives funds under a program authorized by the ESEA and
requests a
waiver.
And yet just the other day, Governor Malloy, Commissioner Pryor and the Connecticut State Board of Education were talking about changes and
flexibility associated with Connecticut's absurd teacher evaluation system, but there was virtually no mention that the federal
waiver Malloy, Pryor and the state
requested and received puts severe limitations on just how much «
flexibility» Connecticut has in some of these areas.