Also, there may have been loud allegations of cheating leveled against certain children based on
flimsy circumstantial evidence.
Not exact matches
To me, what you have described is the
flimsiest of
circumstantial evidence, not enough to convict and certainly not over-whelming.
Simply saying that «there is no empirical
evidence» or that the
evidence presented thus far is «the
flimsiest of
circumstantial evidence» doesn't make either so.