Sentences with phrase «flow than a negative one»

Not exact matches

While Tesla expressed confidence about the second half of the year, negative free cash flow was more than $ 1 billion for the third time in the last four quarters.

An analysis by Bloomberg found the company spends more than $ 6,500 every minute and has had negative free cash flow for five quarters.

As seen above Valeant's true cash flow is not only much lower than Valeant would have investors believe, it is also largely negative.

On the other hand, negative FCF can be an attractive indication that a company has more investment opportunities than it can fund with internal cash flows.

The illusion is growth in revenues, EBITDA, or non-GAAP metrics that overlook the price paid for the acquiree, which, more often than not, is so high that the real cash flows of the deal are highly negative and dilutive to shareholder value.

Right now, it's reviewing some locations, less than 100, that have negative cash flow.

More than likely the investor would have a negative cash flow?

Furthermore, the next chart shows that money flows to equity mutual funds and exchange traded funds have rarely, if ever, been more persistently negative than they have been during the past two years.

Every pension fund under the sun in this country — because rates are so low — has monthly negative outflows of cash: beneficiaries are being paid more money than is flowing into the fund.

Other studies found that funds with positive net flow perform better than those with negative net flow over the short term.

• One point is deducted when values are greater than 25 or if either cash flow or free cash flow is negative.

You'll have a negative cash flow, but this will be more than offset by the property's appreciation in value and the fact that you're building equity with the monthly mortgage payments (that have been subsidized by your renters).

Similarly, businesses with negative cash flow have more cash leaving than coming in.

If you spend more money than you earn, your cash flow will be negative.

Mutual funds with positive money flow perform better in the short term than do funds with negative money flow, suggesting good fund selection ability on the part of investors.

A ratio less than 1.00 would indicate a negative cash flow and the borrower would then have to pay for normal operating expenses from other funds.

MFC could, of course, lose more than $ 75 million as they continue funding cash flow negative operations but there does appear to be considerable potential upside on these assets.

Negative cash flow means that you are spending more than you earn.

Me: nothing illegal, yes, but because of new cash flow testing rules which our client is subject to, the negative convexity of RMBS will force our client to put up more risk - based capital than they would otherwise have to.

More than likely the investor would have a negative cash flow?

Those periodic special dividends are feasible because of the firm's immaculate balance sheet, which has almost no debt, relatively high cash levels (relative to the size of the company and its acquisitions), and a high current ratio (i.e. the company's short - term assets cover its short - term liabilities by more than three-fold, thus protecting it from unexpected negative financial strains, such as during recessions when demand from restaurants can lead to declining sales, earnings, and cash flow).

If your cash flow is negative — that is, you are shelling out more than your bringing in — you may ultimately have to draw on your business capital.

I did the snorkeling hobe cat and kayaking and the trip to konco falls all very very nice... I say for the money I spent and what I got I did get more than anticipated — I saw some negative reviews in the past - all can say from my experience is that if your not snobby - and go with the flow and love the people and are not rude you will love it here — much love for this resort and the people of jamacia!

But if the problem is at all hard such as separated flow or vortex dominated problems, the results are much worse than most people realize, mostly because not very many negative results are published.

More than half of Europe's coal plants are already bleeding cash, but by 2030, the percentage of coal plants in Europe that report negative cash flow could explode to an...

To point out just a couple of things: — oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).

It may flow faster when the temperature gradient is negative than when it is positive, but it still flows only from hot to cold.

The employee must show that the workplace rule results in «a real disadvantage to the parent / child relationship and the responsibilities that flow from that relationship, and / or to the employee's work», rather than simply showing a mere negative impact on a family need.

If rates are more negative than the cash flow burn of the company, in our bizarro world, the investment actually is outperforming.

I think it is smart to have a minimum cash flow goal, because anything less than $ 100 - $ 200 per door could easily be eaten away by higher - than - expected repairs or utility bills... and then you end up in the negative cash flow zone.

That means if you have more than half going to PI (principal and interest) you may be close to a negative cash flow.

Because where my head is at, I've been paying way to much in rent over the last 10 years without owning anything so if I can find a 3 or 4 unit that's not negative cash flowing and have tenants that are helping with equity build, then I'm in a much better spot than current.

Even if you can't receive enough rent to cover your mortgage payments, paying a small amount of negative cash flow every month might be easier on the pocketbook than forking over thousands of dollars for a vacant house.

No less than 44 per cent of investors who took possession of new units in 2017 were in negative cash flow.

You mentioned you were cash chunking to increase your revenues in a negative cash flow scenario, so I'm curious if the rent was less than your mortgage payments, rent prices somehow decreased, you had vacancies, etc?

«But more than 44 per cent of mortgage holders were cash flow negative — meaning the owners were spending more to maintain the condos every month than they were getting in rental income.