This flows by analogy with our spiritual minds which discover such meaningful control and constructive direction.
Not exact matches
Maxwell reformulated these ideas
by analogy with the mathematics of fluid
flow.
By analogy with the way water
flows on Earth, Tully looked at what he calls «watersheds» in space.
So
by analogy of that we would expect the female Neandertal to be the most likely price to be looking for signs of gene
flow, and it does not seem to be there so far.
In this
analogy, the water level in the cup is the Earth's total energy and the constant water
flow is the extra radiative power added
by human emissions.
By analogy, it then follows that if you choose A to be the sun, B to be the earth's surface, and C to be the atmosphere, then one can immediately see the fallacy in claiming that «the greenhouse effect violates the 2nd Law because it implies heat
flows from the colder atmosphere to the warmer surface» (that's a paraphrase).
I once attempted to explain the potential, that decades into the future it might not be possible to reliably predict regional implications of gross climate alteration,
by drawing the
analogy to the difficulty of comprehending the precise path of a smoke particle, as a plume broke from laminar to turbulent
flow.