Sentences with phrase «flrs in»

Heated flrs in all baths on 2nd.

Gorgeous home w / lots of natural light boasts custom remodeled gourmet kitchen w / stainless appliances, cooktop, dual ovens, granite tops, island, beautiful cherry cabinetry & tile floor!LR w / French door to deck.Hardwood flrs in LR & DR. Walk - out, new carpet, FP, powder room & utility storage room.Fenced backyard.Next to Lake & trails!

Hardwood Flrs In...

Not exact matches

Strong profitability and low market expectations lead us to believe an investment in FLR will pay off sooner or later.

Despite slumping commodities prices affecting its oil, gas, and mining businesses, FLR still managed a 21 % ROIC in 2015 and finished the year with a larger backlog than it had at the end of 2014.

Sep 1: $ 599,000 Jun 30: $ 629,000 * Concord Park Place Discovery * Never Live In Luxury 2 Bedroom Townhome Plus Family Room, * Main Flr 10Ft High Ceilings * * Conveniently Located * Short...

Then finally I got rid of the egg, went back to the gelatin, creamed the butter, sugar, and maple syrup in the mixer, 1 T more of coconut and arrowroot flr, substituted the BP for BS, and BAM!

Whether you are looking to increase your fitness potential, get in shape for your wedding, eat for a healthy pregnancy, make your family meals healthier or lose those stubborn post-baby pounds, FLR Nutrition is here to help!

Then finally I got rid of the egg, went back to the gelatin, creamed the butter, sugar, and maple syrup in the mixer, 1 T more of coconut and arrowroot flr, substituted the BP for BS, and BAM!

# 1 in Female supremacy dating, FLR relationships and Femdom Marriages.

But this guide was created to help you # 1 in Female supremacy dating, FLR relationships and Femdom Marriages.

From Wikipedia The term female - led relationship (or FLR) refers to a model for romantic heterosexual relationship in which both partners.

TS - Dating is the premier worldwide shemale escort site which specifically caters to transsexuals, shemales, transvestites, crossdressers, ladyboys and # 1 in Female supremacy dating, FLR relationships and Femdom Marriages.

2018-04-08 17:55 BDSM Dating, 100 % free BDSM Social Network Community, with new dating app for people interested in BDSM, with personals, research, matchmaking, singles and Best BDSM FEMDOM Dating Website, FLR relationships and Femdom Marriages

Move Right In To A Lovely Open Concept Main Flr W / Gleaming Hardwd, Newly Renovated Kit W / Quartz Counter, Subway Tile Bcksplsh, Sliding Gls Door To Deck & Garden, Fabulous Bsmt, W / Rec Rm.

Convey, Fire Sprinkler, Split Bedroom Plan, Smoke Detector, Washer / Dryer, Wshr / Dryer Connection, Furnished, Enter Through Foyer, 1 st Flr Level,Walk - in Closet, Oceanfront, Inside City Limits, East Of Bus 17, Ocean Front, End Unit, Shower, Vanity, Garden Tub, Lvr / DR Combo, Central Heat, Central Air, Electric, Slab, Electric, Cable TV, Electricity, Sewer, Telephone, Water Public, Dishwasher, Garbage Disposal, Refrigerator, Range, Breakfast Bar, Oven, Freezer, Microwave, Pantry, Range Hood, Granite Countertops

Convey, Fire Sprinkler, Split Bedroom Plan, Smoke Detector, Washer / Dryer, Wshr / Dryer Connection, Furnished, Enter Through Foyer, 1 st Flr Level, Ceiling Fan,Walk - in Closet, Linen Closet, Oceanfront, East Of Bus 17, Outside City Limits, Ocean Front, Double Sink, Shower, Vanity, Whirlpool Tub, Lvr / DR Combo, Central Heat, Central Air, Electric, Slab, Electric, Cable TV, Electricity, Sewer, Telephone, Underground Utilities, Water Public, Dishwasher, Garbage Disposal, Refrigerator, Range, Breakfast Bar, Microwave, Pantry, Stainless Steel Apps., Granite Countertops, Ceiling Fan, Tray Ceiling

Convey, Fire Sprinkler, Washer / Dryer, Wshr / Dryer Connection, Furnished, Enter Through Foyer, 1 st Flr Level, Ceiling Fan,Walk - in Closet, Oceanfront, Inside City Limits, East Of Bus 17, Ocean View, Double Sink, Shower, Vanity, Whirlpool Tub, Fam / DR Combo, Central Heat, Central Air, Electric, Raised Beach, Electric, Cable TV, Electricity, Sewer, Telephone, Underground Utilities, Water Public, Dishwasher, Garbage Disposal, Refrigerator, Range, Breakfast Bar, Oven, Microwave, Granite Countertops, Closing

Facilities, Legal and Accounting, Master Antenna / Cable TV, Common Maint / Repair, Electric In Unit, Telephone Service In Unit, Internet Access, Designated Flood Zone, Single Level, Carpeting, Tile, Smoke Detector, 1 st Flr Level, Oceanfront, East Of Bus 17, Ocean Front, Tub, Shower, Vanity, Window / Wall Unit, Slab, Electric, Cable TV, Electricity, Sewer, Telephone, Underground Utilities, Water Public, Refrigerator, Oven, Microwave, Granite Countertops

Convey, Elevator, Split Bedroom Plan, Smoke Detector, Washer / Dryer, Wshr / Dryer Connection, Furnished, Enter Through Foyer, 1 st Flr Level, Ceiling Fan,Walk - in Closet, Linen Closet, Oceanfront, East Of Bus 17, Outside City Limits, Ocean Front, End Unit, Double Sink, Shower, Vanity, Whirlpool Tub, Area, Central Heat, Central Air, Electric, Slab, Electric, Cable TV, Electricity, Sewer, Telephone, Water Public, Dishwasher, Garbage Disposal, Refrigerator, Range, Breakfast Bar, Microwave, Pantry, Trash Compactor, Stainless Steel Apps., Granite Countertops, Ceiling Fan

1st flr ensuite mstr bdrm with steam shower, jetted tub, walk in closet, and sitting area by gas fireplace.

Set on the edge of Grondin Pond, this spacious home offers wood flrs throughout the 1st lvl, an open concept kitchen w / island, a great room w / charming built - ins & wood stove, a freshly painted formal dining & living room, a spacious master... Ver detalles de la propiedad»

Common Room @ Studio of Björn Meyer - Ebrecht, 1182 Flushing Ave, 2nd flr / Jefferson Stop Common Room is the second installment of a series of curatorial projects curated by Björn Meyer - Ebrecht in his studio.

Procedurally, there is no distinction between Barder events (see below) and those giving rise to an appeal to set aside (Wilson LJ in Judge v Judge [2008] EWCA Civ 1458, [2009] 1 FLR 1287 referred to a 1981 decision of Ormrod LJ; but he overlooked SCA 1981, s 17, B - T (above) and the review of this area of law in Taylor v Lawrence [2002] EWCA Civ 90, [2003] QB 528 (see below)-RRB-.

This is explained fully by Ward J in B - T v B - T [1990] 2 FLR 1, [1990] FCR 654.

Shortly after CSA 1991 received Royal Assent, but long before its delegated legislation was made, Waite J commented (R v Luton Magistrates» Court exp Sullivan [1992] 2 FLR 1961) on magistrates» committal procedures: «The power under [Magistrates» Courts Act 1980] s 76 for magistrates to issue a writ committing a spouse to prison for non-payment of maintenance in their domestic jurisdiction is a power of extreme severity.

In Mubarak v Mubarak [2001] 1 FLR 698, [2000] All ER (D) 2302 the first post-Human Rights Act 1998 case on this jurisdiction (and see «Enforcement matters», David Burrows, 159 NLJ 7368, p 653), Brooke LJ emphasised the importance that the respondent, who faces what amounts to a criminal charge (see Engel and Others v The Netherlands (No 1)(1979) 1 EHRR 647), should know the case against him or her (ie McFarlane LJ's list: (a) and (b)-RRB-: «In Newman v Modern Bookbinders Ltd [2000] 2 All ER 814, [2000] 1 WLR 2559 judgment was given in [a case which is] far removed from the presenIn Mubarak v Mubarak [2001] 1 FLR 698, [2000] All ER (D) 2302 the first post-Human Rights Act 1998 case on this jurisdiction (and see «Enforcement matters», David Burrows, 159 NLJ 7368, p 653), Brooke LJ emphasised the importance that the respondent, who faces what amounts to a criminal charge (see Engel and Others v The Netherlands (No 1)(1979) 1 EHRR 647), should know the case against him or her (ie McFarlane LJ's list: (a) and (b)-RRB-: «In Newman v Modern Bookbinders Ltd [2000] 2 All ER 814, [2000] 1 WLR 2559 judgment was given in [a case which is] far removed from the presenIn Newman v Modern Bookbinders Ltd [2000] 2 All ER 814, [2000] 1 WLR 2559 judgment was given in [a case which is] far removed from the presenin [a case which is] far removed from the present.

The underlying issue for an appeal is simple: the appellate court (AC), ie Court of Appeal; a High Court judge; a circuit judge etc) may only allow an appeal if it considers the decision below was «wrong» (r 52.11 (3)-RRB-: wrong in law, wrong on the facts or because the judge exercised his discretion wrongly («plainly wrong»: Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 WLR 1360, [1999] 2 FLR 763); or unjust because of a procedural irregularity.

To set aside — on either basis — is «exceptional» (see eg, Lawrence Collins LJ in Dixon v Marchant [2008] EWCA Civ 11, [2008] 1 FLR 655: the need for finality must be balanced against the requirement of «justice» (Barder)-RRB-.

Thorpe LJ provides some helpful procedural advice which may be incorporated into new family courts rules; but, in the longer term, does this case represent a continued widening of the door for outright capital provision for unmarried carer parents — in line with Re P (a child: financial provision)[2003] EWCA Civ 837, [2003] All ER (D) 312 (Jun)-- as against the interests in possession during a child's dependency favoured by earlier cases, eg T v S [1994] 1 FCR 743, [1994] 2 FLR 883; A v A [1995] 2 FCR 353, [1995] 2 FLR 356; J v C (a child: financial provision)[1998] 3 FCR 79, [1999] 1 FLR 152?

In Atkinson v Atkinson [1988] 2 FLR 353, [1987] 3 All ER 849, the Court of Appeal awarded financial provision even though the wife was living with another man.

For Charles J this case had an added significance, poignancy even, since the lead case on capitalisation of periodical payments under MCA 1973, s 31 (7B), as happened here, is Pearce v Pearce [2003] EWCA Civ 1054, [2003] All ER (D) 467 (Jul) which «roundly rejected» (the words of Charles J at para 40), his own decision on this subject in Cornick v Cornick (No 3)[2001] 2 FLR 1240.

In Pounds v Pounds [1994] 1 FLR 775 the Court of Appeal held that a consent order could be approved by a district judge as part of his «directions for trial» when approving the special procedure documents for divorce.

Typically the situation may arise — as it did in the first of this type of case: A v A (maintenance pending suit: provision for legal fees)[2001] 1 FLR 377, where a wealthy husband, who controls the couple's cash, can make it hard for his wife to raise cash to pay her lawyers before there is a final capital order.

First M argued that a court must approach the application with Edgar principles in mind: that the court will only interfere with an agreement where there has been a drastic change of circumstances or there are other vitiating factors such as undue pressure, inadequate knowledge, inadequacy of the agreement (see Camm v Camm [1983] 4 FLR 577) and so on.

So, we now have the leading family law series (the FLR) in the hands of LexisNexis and LexisNexis» previous attempt to compete with Jordan (the FCR) in the hands of Bloomsbury.

Permission to appeal against ancillary relief orders (after Barder v Barder (Caluori intervening)[1988] AC 20, [1987] 2 FLR 480, HL) has been in the reports recently; but in two cases which only emphasise that, for such an application to succeed, the circumstances must be exceptional.

In one of the leading cases, Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17, [2007] 2 All ER 929, Barry Stack was the non-owning partner and claimant; and an important case on proprietary estoppel (Wayling v Jones (1993) 69 P & CR 170, [1995] 2 FLR 1029) concerned a same sex couple.

However, in Robinson v Robinson (Disclosure)(1983) 4 FLR 102, CA Ormrod LJ said that while applications to set aside could be made by either a new action or an appeal to a higher court, there was much convenience in an application to the judge who made the original order who could determine the application and then make a new order if appropriate.

For one thing, he had innovated certain evidentiary requirements for the wife to meet, that were simply not contained anywhere in the Family Law Rules (FLR).

The 2003 version of Family Proceedings Rules 1991, r 8.1 (3) requires that the judge, as appellate tribunal, «be limited to a review of the decision or order of the district judge», save where the «judge considers that... it would be in the interests of justice to hold a rehearing» — as happened, for example in R v R (Lump Sum Repayments)[2003] EWHC 3197 (Fam), [2004] 1 FLR 928, where Mr Justice Wilson (as he then was) decided that the evidence before the district judge needed to be revisited by him.

On the former point he agreed with the conclusion of Mr Justice Munby in Marinos v Marinos [2007] EWHC 2047 (Fam), [2007] 2 FLR 1018 (plus European Court of Justice jurisprudence is relevant and this recognises that habitual residence can be gained in a day).

The right of audience may be granted «in exceptional circumstances and after careful consideration» as stated in the President's Guidance — a principle laid out by Lord Woolf MR in D v S (Rights of Audience)[1997] 1 FLR 724 where the aforementioned Dr Pelling was denied permission to act as an advocate McKenzie friend.

Indeed, the court went further, referring to the approach adopted in Lawlor v Lawlor [1995] 1 FLR 269, in which Lady Justice Butler Sloss had indicated that permission should be given to file an answer out of time, unless the answer in question amounted to an abuse of the court process.

The present Guidelines on Judges Meeting Children who are subject to Family Proceedings April 2010 [2010] 2 FLR 1872 set out their purpose as being to encourage judges to enable children to feel more involved in proceedings which affect them and to ensure judges have understood their wishes and feelings.

While Mr Vaughan's argument succeeded at first instance, the Court of Appeal had little truck with it, approving earlier guidance from Martin v Martin [1976] Fam 335, [1976] 3 All ER 625 and Norris v Norriss [2003] 1 FLR 1142, [2003] All ER (D) 428 (Feb): clear evidence of wanton dissipation of assets should result in factoring back of the relevant monies into the matrimonial pot.

Baron J reviewed the authorities on issue estoppel and found herself in agreement with Re B and another (minors)(care proceedings: evidence)[1997] 1 FLR 285, [1997] 2 All ER 29 and Mrs Justice Hale (as she then was) that issue estoppel in children cases, in any strict sense, does not apply.

On the former point he agrees with the conclusion of Mr Justice Munby in Marinos v Marinos [2007] EWHC 2047 (Fam), [2007] 2 FLR 1018 (plus European Court of Justice jurisprudence is relevant and this recognises that habitual residence can be gained in a day).

CALI's goal in creating FLR, the website says, is «to create a body of court opinions that is accessible to anyone including educators, librarians, students, lawyers and the public.»

In the case of S v S (Divorce: Staying Proceedings)[1997] 2 FLR 100 the couple had a premarital agreement which specified New York state as the jurisdiction.