By using a growth methodology to calculate student outcomes, the Department recognizes that students enter each grade level at varying starting points and with unique challenges and that we should
focus on student improvement, rather than simply how many students attain proficiency.
Not exact matches
The idea arrived at a key time — nearly a decade into the No Child Left Behind era, when schools nationwide
focused obsessively
on year - to - year
improvements in
students» basic math and reading skills.
«We would reserve to see what kind of receivership would be offered we don't want a receivership that doesn't
focus first and foremost
on student improvement.
Educational
improvement efforts, Eye concludes, should
focus not
on correcting a nonexistent overall deficit but
on improving the academic performance of the
students «in the lower portion of the performance distribution,» many of whom face social and familial challenges that interfere with their education.
We are a community of mindbodygreen, accepting of differences, celebrating the success of others,
students, and friends
focused on the
improvement of ourselves and our fellow person.
States should seize the possibilities for more innovative approaches to school
improvement posed by the Every
Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), which replaces a law much criticized for its heavy - handed federal role and for
focusing schools heavily
on teaching for low - level multiple - choice tests in reading and math to the neglect of other subject areas and higher - level skills.
Previous conferences
focused on themes of Australian Curriculum, Teachers driving school
improvement, and Improving assessments of
student learning.
But RTI was quickly adopted as a model for overall school
improvement because of its
focus on providing assistance quickly to struggling
students, before any academic deficits have a chance to become entrenched.
OECD Director of Education and Skills Andreas Schleicher says Indigenous
students face tough challenges in most education systems, but analysis of outcomes in Canada, New Zealand and Queensland, Australia reveals sustained
improvements have been achieved through
focusing on several or all of six areas.
These «value - added» measures are subject to some of the same problems, but by
focusing on what
students learn over the course of the year, they are a significant
improvement over a simple average test score (or, worse yet, the percentage of
students that score above an arbitrary «proficiency» threshold).
Schools would do better scrapping
student progress and
focussing instead
on school
improvements, according to Russell Hobby, general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers (NAHT).
Yet some may wonder about the potential cost of this
focus on higher - achieving
students, for whom
improvements over the same time period have been modest.
Such interventions
focus not
on improving academic skills or knowledge, but
on changing
students» mindsets about learning — combating negative feelings, or increasing a sense of belonging, or reframing failure as an opportunity for
improvement.
Accountability provisions such as these are likely to be muted under the new NCLB waivers, which stipulate that states must
focus their
improvement efforts
on the lowest - performing 15 % of schools, but de-emphasize performance of
student sub-groups in every school.
On the other hand, when schools can achieve substantial «improvements» by focusing on a relatively small group of students, they face a strong incentive to game the syste
On the other hand, when schools can achieve substantial «
improvements» by
focusing on a relatively small group of students, they face a strong incentive to game the syste
on a relatively small group of
students, they face a strong incentive to game the system.
You can avoid that by
focusing on the
student's
improvement rather than
on his performance relative to his classmates.
Over the past twenty years, Mapp's research and practice
focus has been
on the cultivation of partnerships among families, community members and educators that support
student achievement and school
improvement.
One possible explanation is that principals
focus on the average test scores in a teacher's classroom rather than
on student improvement.
Alonso served as CEO of Baltimore City Public Schools (City Schools) for six years, where he led a reform effort marked by a rebalancing of authority and responsibility among stakeholders, the building of a coalition in support of City Schools, leading edge labor contracts, and a
focus on individual
students and teaching and learning that yielded marked
improvement in achievement and climate data across all levels, the first increases in enrollment in 40 years, and widespread political and ground root support for what have been divisive reform strategies in other districts.
They have a strong
focus on continual
improvement, often with explicit school - wide goals for improving current school practices and levels of
student achievement».
Have
students focus on the positive aspects of the work before pointing out areas of
improvement.
In exchange for that flexibility, the administration will require states to adopt standards for college and career readiness,
focus improvement efforts
on 15 percent of the most troubled schools, and create guidelines for teacher evaluations based in part
on student performance.
A few major areas I hope will receive attention during reauthorization are college / workplace readiness, including the promotion of more rigorous standards; greater accountability at the secondary level; more sophisticated policy and greater accountability for improving teacher effectiveness, particularly at the late elementary and secondary levels; a broadening of attention to math and science as well as to history; and refinements in AYP to
focus greater attention and
improvement on the persistently failing schools by offering real choices to parents of
students stuck in such schools.
In Kelly School, which is discussed in the book, these characteristics were built through a set of interrelated organizational routines including close monitoring of each
student's academic progress, an explicit link between
students» outcomes and teachers» practices, weekly 90 - minute professional development meetings
focused on instructional
improvement, and the cultivation of a formal and informal discourse emphasizing high expectations, cultural responsiveness, and teachers» responsibility for
student learning.
Research confirms that, by requiring states that had not previously implemented school accountability systems to do so, No Child Left Behind worked to generate modest
improvements in
student learning, concentrated in math and among the lowest - performing
students — precisely those
on whom the law was
focused.
Focusing on teachers» deep understanding of mathematics, and of
students» math reasoning, may help bring about real
improvements in elementary math teaching.
Stigler and Hiebert note that, rather than reform, the aim of lesson study is to produce «small, incremental
improvements over long periods of time» and however long the process there remains «an unrelenting
focus on student learning».
Maria Izolda Cela Coelho, the secretary of education of Ceará State in Brazil, says the seminar was an excellent opportunity for her to reflect
on relevant issues of public education
improvement, such as the promotion of high - quality learning among
students, performance gap reduction between different social groups, and the implementation of curricula
focused on the development of 21st - century skills.
I currently help lead a 11 district VA «Networked
Improvement Community» that is
focused on exploring
student - led assessment.
Not only were teachers and staff
focused on improvement, but
students also internalized where they needed to go and what they needed to do to get there.
The latest study
focuses on six Boston schools that, in an earlier analysis, were found to produce large
improvements in
students» performance in the statewide standardized test, the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System.
With the PLC at Work model, data analysis
focuses on the progress of each individual
student, looking at specific percentage
improvements and sharing strategies around how to maximize strengths and overcome weaknesses.
And it promotes equity and continuous
improvement by
focusing on disparities among
student groups across all indicators, which supports local decision - makers and stakeholders in prioritizing
improvement efforts.
Perhaps the best two pieces I've come across are from the Newark Star - Ledger's Tom Moran including an opinion piece
on where things stand that notes district progress along with charter school
improvements and reformers» misguided
focus on the parts of the story Russakoff leaves out (Newark
students are better off, despite the political noise) and also a Q & A with Russakoff in which the author rebuts a deeply flawed NYT review, proposes a forensic audit of Newark's $ 23,000 - per
student spending, but calls the Zuckerberg - funded reform efforts a «wash» over all (Author Dale Russakoff discusses new book).
This proposal would also undoubtedly incentivize LEAs and schools to
focus only
on those
students whose achievement falls near the proficiency cut scores instead of encouraging
improvement among all
students.
It is in this vein that we submit these comments, which are not intended to reflect the entirety of our concerns with the proposed regulations, but rather to illustrate where they impede progress toward ESSA's overall goal: to provide states with maximum flexibility while ensuring a
focus on improving performance, equity and access, and
improvement for all
students.
True educational equity comes from comprehensive school reform, which incorporates academic
improvements along with health care, housing policy, funding changes, family support and other policies that allow
students to go to class safely and actually
focus on their work, and that provides teachers with a work environment and enough support to operate creatively, not like infantilized robots.
Evidence points to the
improvement -
focused messaging having a stronger impact
on both credit attainment and
student attendance, though the size of the study limits our ability to call the difference in outcomes between positive and
improvement messaging statistically significant.
This is a huge
improvement on NCLB - era systems, which encouraged a
focus on «bubble kids,» those just below or above states» proficiency cutoffs, to the detriment of other
students.
Principals this summer
focused on what Mason calls the three main legs of the curriculum: school
improvement, school culture, and
student outcomes.
The 44 higher - performing schools (those with average school - wide math and English test scores a full standard deviation above the mean) «create a shared, school - wide intense
focus on the
improvement of
student outcomes,» it says.
Substantial policy effort has
focused on improving the educational opportunities for
students in these schools, including the Obama administration's School
Improvement Grants (SIG).
It also mentions the importance of increasing capacity to develop faculty that
focuses on school needs and
improvement of
student learning.
Instructional
improvement requires a school - wide
focus on goals and expectations for
student achievement.
For our analysis of the relationship between district
improvement efforts and state influences (see also section 3.3), we
focused mainly
on the small - to medium - sized districts, given that more than 90 % of school districts in the United States serve less than 25,000
students, and given our impression that much research
on the district role in educational reform is concentrated
on the experiences of large, urban districts.
More complex and coordinated patterns of distributed leadership appear when school
improvement initiatives
focus directly
on student learning goals, as distinct from the implementation of specific programs.
The staff of the Minnesota New Country School model the
focus and assess the progress of
students and the school itself through regular self - reflection, school - wide assessment, and
on - going planning for continuous
improvement of programming, instruction, collaboration, and opportunities to serve the goals, the mission, the
students, the communities, and the future more effectively.
This required
focusing on specific areas of leadership practice separately (e.g., methods of clinical supervision, school -
improvement planning, classroom walk - throughs, uses of
student performance data), or within comprehensive guidelines or frameworks for leadership practice.240 In one of the higher - performing urban districts in our sample, district officials organized a three - year principaldevelopment program based
on Marzano «s balanced leadership program.
Describing the most important aspects of instructional leadership in more detail and clarity, this refined version of the framework helps school leaders better identify areas for instructional
improvement and
focus their time and energy
on academic achievement for all
students.
Focusing improvement efforts solely
on low - performing schools and
students is not a productive strategy for continual
improvement in a district.