OCIs might not be the perfect time to lay out your dream family plans, but if a firm bristles at family -
focused questions at callbacks, think hard about how they'd react to a baby shower invite five years down the line.
One
focused question at a time.
Not exact matches
While answering a
question about other names that were considered for the series — one being «Nonprophit,» when the script
focused more on the main character's job
at a non-profit and less on her friendship with Molly — she mentioned it was a challenge selling network executives on the name Insecure.
One of the most interesting Gallup Q12 survey
questions focuses on whether an employee has a best friend
at work.
Cogito CEO Joshua Feast, characterizes this stage as «pre-product market fit,» where the
focus is on answering basic
questions: «When we were
at that stage we had to answer
questions like «What does the market really want?
There have been just two
questions on income inequality asked so far during the debates — one of which was directed
at Sen. Rand Paul right before a commercial break (he
focused on Federal Reserve policy), and the other which was for Gov. Mike Huckabee (who bemoaned general government incompetence).
In response to Business Insider
questions about Southwest's use of oxygen masks on Flight 1380, a company representative said via email: «We aren't ready to engage that level of detail
at this time as we are
focused on the immediate needs of the NTSB investigation.»
Take your most important goal right now — whether it's to lose weight, make more money, or land the promotion
at work — and spend some time
focusing all of your attention towards getting very clear about the answers to the
questions I just proposed.
It's probably not going to be possible to have a jury of people that have never heard of the bands, that have never heard the music, but the real
question is, even with that understanding, can they only
focus on the evidence that's being presented by the parties
at trial and only use that evidence and nothing from their own life experience outside of the courtroom to make that decision?
Rubin writes: «It's useful because it allows people to choose their
focus (work, volunteer, family, hobby)-- preferable to the inevitable
question (well, inevitable
at least in New York City): «What do you do?»»
This table is not that helpful for that
question because the
focus is increasing savings until the 20x
at 60.
The tone of the day was captured in analyst reports, with Cowen & Co. saying it's time to «
question Autopilot leadership»
at Tesla and Sanford C. Bernstein
focusing on the «fallacy of automation» to boost production.
Informal education settings within the community are increasingly seen by many in the broader STEM education community as the best venues for getting
at the «inspiration
question» and attracting students toward STEM -
focused career pathways.
A few
questions around your
focus on CDs, rentals, and dividends: + CDs — aren't you afraid of inflation eating away
at the money here?
Much of the
questioning focused on Page's trip to Moscow in early July, while he was a Trump campaign adviser — because his description of that trip in emails sent
at the time looks very different from his description of it now.
As you look
at those two columns, ask yourself this
question: «During my typical day, do I spend my time and attention
focusing more on the left column or the right column?»
In most countries, the short end of the yield curve implies a view that official interest rates are
at their trough for the current cycle, and attention is now
focused mainly on the
question of when interest rates will begin to rise.
The markets will correct and the
focus will shift to the effects of the stimulus
at this stage of the recovery, which has been
questioned by many economists.
In fact, if you've read this with any mental
focus at all, you should have a hundred times as many
questions as when you started.
The scholarly orgy of debunking has obscured the importance of the facts that such ideals were professed
at all, and that debate about them helped to
focus the attention of a large, diverse, professional community on the
question of what kind of life a lawyer ought to try to live.
«And to
focus more precisely on the issue of «scientific evidence,» the sciences, ordered by their nature and method to an analysis of empirically verifiable objects and states of affairs within the universe, can not even in principle address
questions regarding God, who is not a being in the world, but rather the reason why the finite realm exists
at all.......
Some people may want to
focus on one section of
questions at a time; others may select one or more
question (s) from each section.
Though Leifer casts her net broadly, she
focuses particularly on television and film, and she functions within the constraints of the psychological research, which itself deals largely with cause and effect
questions and with carefully selected variables, one or two
at a time.
It kind of shows your inability to
focus on the
question at hand.
I'll be
focusing on some of the
questions you posed to help me pass as an intellectual
at the BioLogos conference.
The orientation shifts subtly when the
focus is on divine love; the
question now becomes «whether love exists in God,» 27 not
at all whether love itself characterizes the being of God as surely as act and will and power do.
At the time, however, most British people were unconcerned about this tragic event on the other side of Europe and were more
focussed on the
question of Irish Home Rule, which threatened to erupt into civil war.
Insightful is his exploration of the (limited) common ground inhabited by both traditionalists and feminists, whose
focus on women demands that it
at least take seriously
questions of child rearing.
While both of these factors — an inherited distrust of physical form, and a current
focus on monetary economies — clearly shape our feelings and actions in relation to art, the equivocal nature of the Protestant relationship to the arts becomes ever clearer if we look
at what lies behind the
question of iconoclasm.
Gil you have asked some very good
questions why does bad things happen in the world i personally do nt know God did nt explain to Job either why he had to suffer.What i do know is that God desires that none of us should perish but that all would have eternal life in him through Jesus Christ.This world will one day pass away and the real world will be reborn so our
focus as christians is on whats to come and being a witness in the here and now.Both good and bad happens to either the righteous or the sinner so what are we to make of that.What we do know is that God will set all things right
at the appointed time the wicked will be judged and the righteous will be rewarded for there faith isnt that enough reason for us to believe.Free will is only a reality if we can choose between good and bad but our hearts are deceitfully wicked we naturally are inclined toward sin that is another reason whyt we need to be saved from ourselves so what are we to do.For me Christ died and rose again that is a fact witnessed by over 500 people that were alive
at the time and was recorded by historians how many other religious leaders do you know that did that or did the miracles that Jesus did.As far as the bible is concerned much of the archelogical evidence has proven to be correct and many of prophetic words spoken many hundreds of years ago have come to pass including both the birth and the death of Jesus.Interested in what philosophy you are believing in if other than a faith in Jesus Christ so how does that philosophy give you the assurance that you are saved.Its really simple with christianity we just have to believe in Jesus Christ.brentnz
In describing and accounting for the lives of the Religious Right, which we define simply as religious conservatives with a considerable involvement in political activity, the book and the series tell the story primarily by
focusing on leading episodes in the movement's history, including, but not limited to, the groundwork laid by Billy Graham in his relationships with presidents and other prominent political leaders; the resistance of evangelical and other Protestants to the candidacy of the Roman Catholic John F. Kennedy; the rise of what has been called the New Right out of the ashes of Barry Goldwater's defeat in 1964; a battle over sex education in Anaheim, California, in the mid-1960's; a prolonged cultural war over textbooks in West Virginia in the early 1970's — and that is a battle that has been fought less violently in community after community all over the country; the thrill conservative Christians felt over the election of a «born - again» Christian to the Presidency in 1976 and the subsequent disappointment they experienced when they found out that Jimmy Carter was, of all things, a Democrat; the rise of the Moral Majority and its infatuation with Ronald Reagan; the difficulty the Religious Right has had in dealing with abortion, homosexuality and AIDS; Pat Robertson's bid for the presidency and his subsequent launching of the Christian Coalition; efforts by Dr. James Dobson and Gary Bauer to win a «civil war of values» by changing the culture
at a deeper level than is represented by winning elections; and, finally, by addressing crucial
questions about the appropriate relationship between religion and politics or, as we usually put it, between church and state.
Whether one deems this cluster of
questions the third part of an expanded just war tradition or an extension of «right intention,» one of the classic deontological ad bellum criteria, this is obviously an area in which considerable criticism of the Iraq War has been
focused» whether the issue
at hand involves the scandals
at Abu Ghraib prison, interrogation methods, de-Baathification policies, counterinsurgency strategies and tactics, or the provisions of the new Iraqi constitution with respect to religious freedom and the role of Islamic law in post-Saddam Iraq.
At the beginning of a counseling experience, many couples are too hurt and angry to be able to ask
questions which
focus on their problems of relating.
One of the better ways to get
at an answer is to
focus the
question like this: Is the Father of Jesus the God of Muhammad?
At the Arsenal AGM yesterday, there were
questions from the Arsenal Supporters Trust and some of them, inevitably,
focused on what is seen as a serious lack of investment in the playing squad in recent years.
If Arsenal beat Barcelona this evening it'll be no surprise to me, the
question however is if can we keep our discipline and
focus at the notoriously boisterous atmosphere in the return leg
at the Nou Camp.
This is an incredibly difficult
question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look
at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system...
at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless
at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to
focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and,
at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
At the moment it is certainly Arsene who is taking all the blame for the lack of football success — my question is — rather than focusing on the immediacy of what happens on the field of play and blaming the players and Arsene — shouldn't we be looking at what goes on in the USA and in the boardroom with the people who control the financial decisions about the investment in our players squad and ask when our major competitors are investing so much — why aren't Arsenal doing the same and investing more in player
At the moment it is certainly Arsene who is taking all the blame for the lack of football success — my
question is — rather than
focusing on the immediacy of what happens on the field of play and blaming the players and Arsene — shouldn't we be looking
at what goes on in the USA and in the boardroom with the people who control the financial decisions about the investment in our players squad and ask when our major competitors are investing so much — why aren't Arsenal doing the same and investing more in player
at what goes on in the USA and in the boardroom with the people who control the financial decisions about the investment in our players squad and ask when our major competitors are investing so much — why aren't Arsenal doing the same and investing more in players?
@Gigi2 You mean «If we can't get
focused enough to beat Hull
at home, you've got to ask serious
questions of the players»
With Stowell, learning quirky and mundane tidbits about her felt like a refreshing distraction from the elephant in the room: she wrote homework
questions, despite wanting to avoid homework in high school; she was part of a lab group that
focused on eating competitions; she had a nail polish collection; she loved watching terrible movies; she used to play rugby, realized she wasn't good
at it, and then switched to ultimate frisbee.
never waste CAPITAL LETTERS on an article about Chambers
at this juncture... I still can't believe that no one from management has ever explained why such a frugal club spent so much money on him in the first place... we haggle for months and years with clubs for players who could have a monumental impact on the very future of our club but somehow we found $ 16 million for someone who couldn't regularly crack a Southampton lineup (very fishy)... don't get me wrong, I like what he showed
at times last season in Middlesbourogh but from the handful of games I watched him play I still have some serious
questions about his consistency as a back - line player in the EPL; as such he should prove himself on loan for another season, making sure that he goes to a team that wants him in the starting 11... bottom line, let's not get bogged down with the semantics of peripheral players and
focus on the real task
at hand = figure out who the hell is going to be our starting 11 for the foreseeable future, which means getting contracts signed, getting rid of a lot of deadwood and bringing in talented players into the positions which truly need upgrading... the rest is just unnecessary noise
While those
question marks remain, with the transfer activity mainly
focusing on attacking options so far, the defense for the opening day has even more
question marks with Pontuss Jansson suspended for the first two games of the season, the opening match
at Bolton and the League Cup match against Port Vale.
Secondly, rather than a general overview
at our squad and how it is shaping up (you can find them all over the place, I particularly liked Jimmy Gooner's) I wanted to write a more
focused piece that looked
at the 9 big
questions I feel will define our season.
Kristi: I actually took a lot of heat a while back for not just defending milk but defending the dreaded flavored milk — or
at least
questioning why school food reformers were so
focused on flavored milk versus versus many other, worse problems in the school lunch program.
The main point of my 2011 post was to
question why Jamie Oliver (whose «Food Revolution» show was then on television) was
focusing so intensely on banning chocolate milk in American schools
at a time when there were, in my opinion, far more pressing school food issues which would have benefitted from his celebrity and clout.
My
question right now (we have been trying to follow the eat / wake / sleep pattern for a week now with ok success... he still cries before naps that are ALWAYS only 45 minutes, this was true before starting the schedule as well) should I just
focus on keeping up the pattern or start a schedule all
at once??
The 50 +
questions about your current parenting become the
focus of a conversation with me where we will both celebrate your successes and look
at what is especially challenging right now.
To answer my
questions,
FOCUS put me in touch with Kathryn Colasanti of the C.S. Mott Group for Sustainable Food Systems
at Michigan State.
Within most groups of MPs there is normally
at least one determinedto
focus exclusively on the Novi Pazar
question or the central importance inglobal affairs of unexploded WW2 chemical weapons in the Baltic Sea.
Looking
at the list, the reporter
questions often
focused on the horserace rather than the issues: «Is the drop in violence in Iraq making it a less important campaign issue?»