Evaluation systems often attempt to offset
the focus on test score data by incorporating other measures of teacher effectiveness, including observations, peer review, and other teacher materials.
Not exact matches
With today's
focus on test scores and achievement, there's a tremendous amount of good
data.»
-- those kinds of conversations around
data can lead to much more productive work than the ones that are
focused on «[let's use]
data to think about how we're going to improve
test scores».
While negotiations between the union and district have stalled over the issue of how much weight to give student
test scores, E4E - LA members found that teachers would support incorporating student growth
data, but worry about
focusing myopically
on one high - stakes
test.
It's not just
focusing on data about the
test scores and so
on.
But with an increased national
focus on standardized
test scores, the
data collection process has become much more formalized in recent years.
His work
focuses on finding better ways to use
test -
score and other
data to inform teaching and leadership practices.
Evers said the new accountability system most likely will
focus on data the state already has the ability to collect, such as proficiency and growth over time
on a new state
test being developed, advanced placement enrollment, graduation rates, college entrance exam
scores and industry certification for students who don't go
on to college.
«If Washington, D.C., went to one extreme,» Barnum writes, «in
focusing on test - driven accountability policies, as some argue, California has gone to the other: placing a lengthy pause
on school accountability, devolving control to local districts, eliminating certain
data systems and declining to tie teacher evaluations to student
test scores.»
What Peterson and Kaplan should have done was simply
focus on the underlying
data, which shows that for most of the past eight years, many states have set proficiency targets and cut
scores on state
tests that have undermined the goals (and, in some cases, high expectations set by) their old curricula standards.
The year we changed our
focus from textbooks, programs, supplies, schedules, buildings, grades,
test scores, etc. to
focus on the heart of the matter at the root level (culture, identity, will, beliefs, thoughts, emotions, empathy, relationships, etc.), we transformed our performance
data.
In years past, K - 12 accountability measures
focused on data points such as third - grade reading
scores, the number of ninth - graders taking algebra, or setting new records for the most number of AP
tests taken and passed.
Another challenge is weaning teachers from a
focus on data and
test scores.
The latest movement to add more technology into classrooms is repeating the same mistakes,
focusing on how tech can help teachers by churning out more
data about students, saving time and raising
test scores.
-- The 2014 proposed rule,
focused on increasing teacher prep program accountability, received thousands of comments — many of them negative — about how much it would ultimately cost states, whether it would stretch their
data collection capacities and whether it relies too much
on student
test scores.
all participating schools be subject to an annual evaluation that will
focus on the educational outcomes of students (which would include disaggregated discipline
data, state
test scores, college course pass, college success, etc.) and the program impact.
If Washington, D.C., went to one extreme, in
focusing on test - driven accountability policies, as some argue, California has gone to the other: placing a lengthy pause
on school accountability, devolving control to local districts, eliminating certain
data systems, and declining to tie teacher evaluations to student
test scores.
Underlying the Big
Data approach is a myopic
focus on standardized
test scores as the sole measure of student learning.