In light of these many complex factors, for scientists to angrily and emotionally
focus on climate skeptics as the primary source of societal inaction is a major distraction and it reflects their own perceptual biases.
Not exact matches
«The language style used by
climate change
skeptics suggests that the arguments put forth by these groups may be less credible in that they are relatively less
focused upon the propagation of evidence and more intent
on refuting the opposing perspective,» said Pennycook.
In the talk, Victor, trained in political science, warns against
focusing too much
on trying to defeat those denying the widespread view that greenhouse - driven
climate change is a clear and present danger, first explaining that there are many kind of people engaged at that end of the global warming debate — including camps he calls «shills» (the professional policy delayers), «
skeptics» (think Freeman Dyson) and «hobbyists.»
Too bad these
climate blogs (both
skeptics and believers)
focus on ad hominem attacks like this.
My
focus is
on the accusation that
skeptic climate scientists are paid fossil fuel industry money to lie about the issue to the public.
This is actually pretty common in all of the blogosphere, and moreso in those science blogs which aren't
focused (nor do they care too much)
on climate science, but whenever some controversy hits the cables they have to put their uninformed hands into it, preferably to state for the nth time why the
skeptics and deniers are such fools and shills for the oils and the rethuglicans.
Climate skeptics focused on scientific illiterates like Al Gore and a recent graduate named Michael Mann, allowing real leaders of the climate movement, like NAS President — Climatologist Ralph Cicerone — to continue directing federal research funds to support an unannounced 1945 social geo - engineering experiment to save themselves and the world from possible nuclear annihi
Climate skeptics focused on scientific illiterates like Al Gore and a recent graduate named Michael Mann, allowing real leaders of the
climate movement, like NAS President — Climatologist Ralph Cicerone — to continue directing federal research funds to support an unannounced 1945 social geo - engineering experiment to save themselves and the world from possible nuclear annihi
climate movement, like NAS President — Climatologist Ralph Cicerone — to continue directing federal research funds to support an unannounced 1945 social geo - engineering experiment to save themselves and the world from possible nuclear annihilation.
Leaving aside the PC issues associated with labeling people, I don't think their main premise that motivating
skeptics by framing the issue in terms of the welfare of their society, instead of
focussing on risks of
climate change, works.
But Muller's study made waves in the media because he had been a prominent
climate - change
skeptic, partly funded by a foundation linked to global - warming deniers, and his research
focused on skeptics» objections to previous studies of warming.
With few exceptions, such as the part of McI's response that discusses PCA (as contrasted with the part of his commentary that repeats plagiarism charges against Wahl and Ammann), the
focus of discussion among the
skeptics at
Climate Audit, the Air Vent, and elsewhere is almost entirely
on the plagiarism allegations against Wegman, rather than the substantive deficiencies in the statistical analysis in Wegman's report.
However, this GelbspanFiles blog
focuses on the origins of the overall smear of
skeptic climate scientists.
The hour - long expose of the oil giant
focuses primarily
on ExxonMobil's support of
climate change «
skeptics», and its influence
on the Bush administration.
Perhaps Gelbspan has no direct current involvement in global warming political efforts, but regarding the question of where he is these days, the answer seems to indicate that his collective past efforts are worthy of deep professional level investigation in relation to all the current
focus on using racketeering laws to persecute
skeptic climate scientists and the organizations having any association with them.
Details of how the cuts will be achieved remain a little sketchy, but assuming that there will be a significant
focus on saving energy and improving efficiency, this is one of those environmental measures that should please even the most fiscally conservative
climate skeptics.
There seem to be several mutually contradictory statements made by
climate research
skeptics who
focus on hurricane activity.
The topic accounted for 2.5 % of the newshole, with attention
focused on the UN
Climate Summit and emails from the research center that some contended pointed to possible manipulation of climate data and generated an outcry from global warming sk
Climate Summit and emails from the research center that some contended pointed to possible manipulation of
climate data and generated an outcry from global warming sk
climate data and generated an outcry from global warming
skeptics.
Working Group II, the section that
focuses on the impacts of
climate change and how to adapt to it, was a particular target for
climate skeptics in assailing the fourth assessment report.