Sentences with word «folksonomy»

Most of the more than 1,500 images are tagged, so users learn the value of folksonomies for making sense of large collections.

Although the artificial folksonomy was created by mindless agents that followed simple rules and had limited information, its structure was close to the real ones.

Tags are based on folksonomy, a system of classification derived from the practice of collaboratively creating and managing tags to annotate and categorize content within specific networks.

To compare the model's output with real folksonomies, the researchers downloaded tag - related data from Del.icio.us and Connotea.

For example, the set of tags within the 37,974 posts on Del.icio.us that contained the label «blog» fit the power law curve, and tags from the virtual folksonomy matched it as well, the team reports today in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

One of the hottest areas for social scientists studying online interactions is so - called folksonomies.

As opposed to web site administrators deciding what are the controlled vocabularies and terms within each vocabulary, folksonomies simply allow «free tagging».

I confess that I rolled my eyes when I first read about folksonomy and tagging — how can one ever get consistency in describing like items if you don't have authority control?

When users of folksonomy - based sites post a link to a Web resource they like, they must «tag» it with a string of descriptive words.

To probe the phenomenon, a team led by Vittorio Loreto, a physicist at University of Rome «La Sapienza» in Italy used a simple computer model to create an artificial folksonomy.

Don Steiny, a computer scientist and consultant in Santa Cruz, California, is intrigued that simple rules can mimic the self - organizing behavior of folksonomies.

A taxonomy is a categorization system created by a group of experts, but a folksonomy is created spontaneously by millions of strangers through a process called tagging.

A wide — ranging online column written by a team of five contributors; topics included the fundamentals of search technologies, folksonomies, technology lessons from Hurricane Katrina, and the author's technology peeves.

Hashtags are a folksonomy, not a taxonomy.

Hashtags are also an important part of a Community of Practice and often determined by and promoted via the folksonomy approach.

I have to say that I'm not too keen on a folksonomy, even (especially?)

We haven't seen the end of the development of folksonomies, probably with a bit more editorial control somehow, though.

Steve asks you to tag works of art, hoping to develop from this folksonomy ways of making art and artifacts more accessible generally.

Moreover, like a folksonomy, the common law works instance by instance and is an emergent property, not entirely predictable, always coming into existence without arriving; it's a bottom - up process operating via solicitor's letter, argument, negotiation, lawsuit etc. case by case by case.

Folksonomies will be part of that, but aren't without risks.

Maybe Google's just getting on the bandwagon, because tags are all the rage, tags and folksonomy.

They created blogs and podcasts, tried out Flickr, set up RSS feeds, learned about wikis, uploaded video to YouTube, played with image generators and Rollyo, and explored Technorati, tagging and folksonomies.

We could let posters categorize ad lib — it's apparently called «folksonomy» — but I'm way too AR to love that idea.

Tags have moved beyond the domain of SGML and XML to the world of folksonomies — but how many firms have leveraged this in their portals?

There are pros and cons to using each approach (taxonomies and folksonomies).

Interesting, isn't it, how in attempting to swim in the flood of information washing over us, we (Google) rock back and forth between «folksonomy» (search on any word ever used by anyone — a sort of universal tagging) and a more formal, albeit loose, taxonomy (web, patent, products, video, etc.).

There is another kind of metadata built on «folksonomies».

Taxonomies should be used in a limited fashion for the most obvious categories of content, leaving room for folksonomies to evolve over time with the nature of the published content.

Folksonomies are user - driven.

Should we be forcing the world view of knowledge organization on our people (various classification schemes, taxonomies and knowledge organization frameworks) versus letting them organize materials on their own and as they see fit (folksonomies)?

It appears to cover some different ground including metadata schemes, XML, ontology and folksonomy.

Web 2.0 concepts have led to the development and evolution of web - based communities, hosted services, and applications; such as social - networking sites, video - sharing sites, wikis, blogs, and folksonomies.»

Web 2.0 «will bring further changes», of which user - generated content and folksonomies have most relevance to scholarly publishing.