Animals don't have to
follow religious doctrines!
Not exact matches
Why is it that these
religious fanatics want to mandate that non-adherents
follow doctrine culled from a little bible text when they can't seem to even
follow the 10 commandments?
I am sure being off by a few degrees will not land them in major
religious issues, after all in a faith based system, the faith and belief you are
following the
doctrine is all that is needed right?
MY gauge is a bit more accurate, those who abuse their
religious doctrines as an excuse to commit murder and arson do NOT represent the vast majority of those who
follow that particular faith.
The right to religions» freedom of religion is infringing upon my choice to not
follow a specific
religious doctrine.
I am quite sure that they are wrong, but my point here is that Whitehead's lack of appreciation of the
religious importance of the no - self
doctrine leads some of his readers to think they can
follow him in general without appropriating this
doctrine.
He responded by relating the parable of the Good Samaritan, one of my personal favorites... bear traps are hidden, and often unseen till bear or human are caught in them... the traps are deliberately placed, they don't just suddenly appear... the answer to the question was the man who had compassion on the man taken by robbers... he was a social and spiritual outcast who had compassion on someone who in normal circumstances would have hated his guts... because his
doctrine and «lifestyle» were not acceptable to the
religious establishment... I have had life experiences that bear this out, experiencing love and compassion from people whom today's
religious establishment demonizes and looks down upon... any reading of the Good Samaritan story should be
followed up by a reading of 1 Corinthians 13....
If, then, he will consider the lives of the great
religious leaders and discover how they reached their goal, he will, without doubt, pursue Islamic
doctrines, and he will heartily
follow the Prophet of Islam and his true descendants.
Following the lead of Archbishop Lefebvre, the clergy of the Priestly Society of St. Pius X (SSPX)-- the ordained members of the Lefebvrist movement — have long claimed that what the Council taught on
religious freedom is false because it contradicted settled Catholic teaching — a claim that has more to do with the agitations of post-1789 French politics than with a serious account of the history of Catholic church - state
doctrine.
Let's get it straight... no person can
follow a
doctrine,
religious or otherwise 100 %, period.
Gays can not be sinners if they do not
follow your particular
religious doctrine.
Sufi — a Muslim mystic; a member of a
religious order which
follows mystical interpretations of Islamic
doctrines and practices.