«The case breaks new ground for NSF, say those who
follow research misconduct.
Not exact matches
Following complaints from a biosolids company, an EPA official used agency letterhead to spread allegations of
research misconduct against Lewis, a situation that Lewis says led to him being forced out in 2003.
Research Institutions, or in limited circumstances discussed in Section b, the DOT Oversight Organization, shall use the following procedures to investigate allegations of research mis
Research Institutions, or in limited circumstances discussed in Section b, the DOT Oversight Organization, shall use the
following procedures to investigate allegations of
research mis
research misconduct:
The
following elements describe the type of behavior, level of intent and burden of proof required to support a finding of
research misconduct:
If a complainant who has reported possible
research misconduct alleges retaliation on the part of DOT organization management, the report will be addressed by management officials who will conduct an inquiry into the allegations
followed by an appropriate management action.
Regardless of whether Mann's participation in Jones» deletion enterprise constituted
research misconduct or not, this particular finding of the Inquiry Committee clearly does not
follow from the information that they presented in their record.
I wrote that in my view Bronk Ramsey had
followed a defensible approach (since his results flow from applying Bayes» theorem using that prior), so there was no
research misconduct involved, but that his method did not represent best scientific inference.
The foregoing procedure shall also be
followed in the event that an investigatory Committee appointed in accordance with Section 5 hereof obtains information that any individual, other than the one initially under investigation, has allegedly engaged in
research misconduct.
On July 1, Penn State found «no substance to the allegation against Dr. Michael E. Mann;» this would be
followed by the National Science Foundation Office of the Inspector General finding «no
research misconduct or other matter raised...»