Sentences with phrase «followers of every religion do»

Not exact matches

Did it ever once occur to your limited mental processes that those who kill in the name of their relgion are not following their religion, and therefore are quite possibly not truly followers of said religion?

Why don't you learn what the various religions actually teach instead of drawing your conclusions from the misguided «professed followers» who simply use their religious beliefs to make their actions acceptable to the dumb masses.

The second category he calls «circumstantial evidence ``, which, if he was shown any of these, might cause him to rethink his position even if he doesn't convert: a genuinely flawless and consistent holy book; a religion without internal disputes or factions; a religion who's followers have never committed or taken part in atrocities; a religion that had a consistent record of winning its jihads and holy wars.

That being said, I know that people will ALWAYS do terrible things, but hopefully by getting rid of organized religions we would make it hard for terrible people to geta footing and develop followers to spread the scale of those bad things.

per vertssss; american living here in canada in niagra falls; the niagra parway is beautiful and the houses magnifigant and there is this huge huge mcmanision called precouis blood 16 plus bedrooms with own bathrooms horse farm top of the line cars in the back very very elegant; guess who lives there priests so thanks for your donations the perverts are living well your not but they are hahahaha people are so stupid to give these freaks any money; and you are totally illiterate if you think these people have any connection to god; i would have to say that god will probly punish the phony pervs and any followers they may have; obviously they know the religion is phony or they wouldnt be doing what they do

What holds more value to you: the words of your religion's founder and most prominent followers -LRB-- words that came straight from God), or laws that constantly change with times and are decided by people who don't follow your religion?

Just because there were (likely) more «Christians» than followers of other religions, doesn't give them the right to display any symbol in a more prominent fashion than those of the religions of any other person that died in that event.

Weeellll, I wouldn't go so far as to call the Catholic church the whore and the Protestant church the false bride, but I do see your point and agree with you that much of institutional religion is not at all what God intended or wanted from followers of Jesus.

The sad thing about the Christian religion is that it doesn't give it's followers the blueprint or architecture of their souls.

Conceding to believers that they can redefine the term «religion» to encompass «atheism», or whatever other ideas they wish to encompass within the word, if that suits their purposes in trying to put anyone who doesn't believe in their god or any god into the same category as themselves, grants to them the opportunity to dismiss anyone who doesn't believe in their god as holding a religious belief no more valid then their own and to classify you as just another follower of a «false religion» unlike their own, which is the «true» religion.

Phelps is himself the Anti-Christ living among us in our own time, fomenting dissent through the false use of religion, leading his followers to do evil in the name of God, as though Phelps is anointed — he is anointed all right, by the Devil himself, to do evil in a way that only the Devil can do so well.

Religious freaks appear in world history FIRST and are the original offenders - and in particular, followers of religions based on the belligerent Jewish «god,» going around telling everyone to «turn or burn,» «If you don't convert we'll torture or kill you,» or you'll be an outcast, etc., etc..

Even people of other religions don't flinch in the slightest when I say «communion reminds me that God became human as Jesus, walked among us, and died for us on a cross» and that «we are followers of Jesus.»

Paul's new religion did not fit well with the Jewish beliefs held by the followers of Jesus (led after the crucifixion by Jesus» brother James).

If you do something stupid and reckless, and you are a mainstream follower of a religion, you are honorable and brave.

Not only do you have no evidence anything you said is true, you ignore the fact that there are followers of hundreds of religions who are every bit as convinced what they believe is true as you are convince what you believe is true.

And when it comes down to what Jesus intended his followers to be and do, and what the religions of the world do (including the religion of Christianity), there are a few major differences.

We live in a rare time and country where we can choose for ourselves how much or little Religion we want in our lives, but the followers of most religions just don't understand the word no!

We don't all understand what it means to be a follower, and we don't all understand the wisdom of God or religion.

They don't have any more understanding of God, than any follower of any other religion.

The truth is that St Paul has the most to do with the diversity of the early Christian Church (Followers of the Way), but today religion is used politically and otherwise to divide humans into «us» as against «them».

(Originally they did not conceive of themselves as starting or belonging to a new religion, since this was not even a formal concept in their self - understanding, but as followers of the hodos, or the «way.»)

Again, your remonstrations about «peace» just ring hollow when we look at what followers of your religion are instructed to do to «infidels».

A great light of religion shone on the minds of the hearers of Peter, so that they were not satisfied with a single hearing or with the unwritten teaching of the divine proclamation, but with every kind of exhortation besought Mark, whose Gospel is extant, seeing that he was Peter's follower, to leave them a written statement of the teaching given them verbally, nor did they cease until they had persuaded him, and so became the cause of the Scripture called the Gospel According to Mark (49).

«Cult» — The word followers of larger, older religions use to label beliefs or non-beliefs they do not approve of.

plz leave people alone im a phd of the o'ccult i am a follower of aleister crowley i've read the bible & the koran & i remember that ur god of the so called bible said judge not 4 2 judge is 2 be judge leave islam alone just because of 9/11 99 % of americans can not get over the past most people r still carryin on over pearl harber & that was 69 yr's ago get over this ur so called christans need 2 do what ur jesus said 4give 4giveness is the way 2 hevan there r nuts in all religons but most people r in hell 4 judgeing others that ur lord - god is the 1 who judges so let him do his job & do what jesus said turn the other check his job is 2 lead ur life as he did 4giveness islam is a great peaceful religion true islam is peaceful loving & 4giveness is the greast america grow up

those without sin cast the first stone, who are any of you to judge and condemn anyone, The One and Only true God, that is alive today having died for all sin, arose and still forgives, you do nt need to know how God existed you only believe, why does everything that people do nt understand need to be explained, God will take care of Eddie Long and our job as a true follower and Christian of Jesus Christ, The Christ, not a religion but a relationship, will continue to pray for all those involved.

But if I take it to be a true representation, as the followers of false religions do, I will be led astray.

Is the church composed only of those who call themselves Christians, or followers of Jesus, and who accept a certain dogma; or does it consist of those who dwell in the Spirit, by whatever religion or label they identify themselves, those who live according to the principle of love for one's fellow man, and of recognizing the holy spirit within each?

No group of people has done as much good for the planet — and yet the blind followers of this new «no religion except what is currently politically correct» religion are ready to hang any Christian on the closest tree.

and about hitler, he was against a particular religion because he believed that religion was wrong and rallied people against the followers of that religion... does nt that sound like republicans today?

2) while many uninformed pundits like Blue — again by their own choosing and lack of initiative — get confused by the thousands of religious faiths, understand the following: don't get bogged down by the thousands of off - shoots, of the three major (by followers) religions in the world, being Christianity, Judaism, and Islam, all three subcribe to the same core Abrahamic (Old Testament) beliefs.

instead of blaming religion we should stop being blind followers and start doing our part, namely that what God told us to do, to read for ourselves, to question what is being taught under prayer and based on knowledge of the Bible, knowing that If He really is God, and the Bible is His word, it can not contradict, and if it seems to do so, then maybe i should question my understanding of it before questioning Him!

I have also read as many of the sacred texts of other religions as I can find, something a True Believer would not, as a rule, do, since they have found the One True Religion, just as the followers of all other religions have.

@Joe R.... yeah... not so much... see we atheists don't believe there is no god, we know... its the followers of said religions that want to believe there is a god... sad really.

Do most religions encourage their followers to act goodly towards others, and have many of them contributed to many charitable actions throughout history?

The followers of those religions believed just as strongly that their gods were real as so many Christians, Muslims, Hindus, etc. do today.

But we'd do well to define what «cult» actually means, both inside the Christian church - i.e., Christians use the term largely to differentiate other religions which deviate from orthodox, historical and Biblical Christianity - and outside, where it's thrown around to describe everything from followers of Kevin Smith films to any organization that's secretive and raises boat loads of money.

Like many Christians and followers of the Abrahamic «revealed» religions, Deanna Laney falsely believed God ordered Abraham to kill his only son because he, God, wanted to know if he, Abraham, had enough faith in God to do it.

Mark was a follower of Christ but did nt believe in man made religion.

Please think about the reality of what religion does, keeps its followers scared to break some rules or you will be banished to some really bad place.

why don't you start with why humans invented religion in the first place, the origins of the books of the bible, the multiple «christ» (copied) stories throughout the history of time, fossil evidence of evolution of man and all species, all the discrepancies in the bible, knowledge of all the gods that humans have believed in through recorded history, the political uses of christianity in the time of it's origin, the fact that every other religion has followers who believe just as strongly in their own god / book, that fact that if you had been born in another part of the world you would be a different religion and going to «hell», and that a good, kind, omniscient god wouldn't allow all the suffering and evil to happen, and wouldn't need «help» as christians like to tout... and then we'll get to all these ridiculous fools.

For example, here is a sentence that describes the confusion among the followers of Jim Jones's People's Temple: «Every one of them was steeped in traditional religion, and they left it because they found a group of people that loved them, that gave them more answers, that cared for them, that generated warmth — when all they did was sit in pews and have meaningless things told to them so they could go out and live meaningless lives.»

Though most of these sites are not religiously involved, some people are coming up with religious sites that will help their followers be able to date online without the exposure of meeting people who do not believe in their religion.

As these religions continue to evolve, followers get lazy and rely on the power of god (s), relics, rituals, writings, etc to do the work for them.

IMO, Patra is a negative example of a religious follower: someone who adopts a religion not by way of a personal spiritual journey and genuine conviction, but for social reasons, such as to please someone (in her case, Leo), looking outside oneself to find the answers, to be led and told what to do.

How did this ancient religion grow from a loose group of individuals following an itinerant preacher into a massive movement with millions of followers?

What do I need to look out for so I can spot «followers of the «green religion».».

Likewise their student body is comprised of followers of many different religions (and none at all) and does not force them to covenant to behave as good Catholics should.