Sentences with phrase «following a court case»

We're following the court case very closely and we are looking into the issue ourselves,» he said.
And following a court case in the summer I ordered that the widespread use of this power should stop.
The baby was taken by social workers following a court case described by Mrs Justice Pauffley as «profoundly alarming».

Not exact matches

Bounce then followed this up with a second case — this one filed in a Texas court in April 2016 — repeating these allegations, also accusing Yieldify of patent infringement, and adding some of Yieldify's customers as defendants.
Current views on whether an asset is a security tends to follow the «Howey Test,» which comes from a 1946 U.S. Supreme Court case.
The case against Shrem has been a beacon to bitcoin community businesses warning them about the significance of regulatory compliance and following the rules of the game, which was also a theme that arose during court.
In the case where an employee may have inappropriately disclosed a trade secret, the courts will examine the following in order to establish wrongdoing:
The French decision follows the May ruling by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in the case of Mario Costeja González, a Spanish man who succeeded in ordering Google to remove links to an old article saying that his home was being repossessed to pay off debts.
In previous cases recorded by the human rights organizations, citizens were denied access to plane tickets because they failed to follow a court ruling.
After March 4, 2013, an International Arrest Warrant will be issued against these Defendants.The guilty verdict followed nearly a month of deliberations by more than thirty sworn Citizen Jurors of the 150 case exhibits produced by Court Prosecutors, The Court's judgement declares the wealth and property of the churches responsible for the Canadian genocide to be forfeited and placed under public ownership, as reparations for the families of the more than 50,000 children who died in the residential schools.To enforce its sentence, the Court has empowered citizens in Canada, the United States, England, Italy and a dozen other nations to act as its legal agents armed with warrants, and peacefully occupy and seize properties of the Roman Catholic, Anglican and United Church of Canada, which are the main agents in the deaths of these children
Employees who refuse to work on their sabbath have been the principal beneficiaries of this rule (in another case a worker lost his job in a brass mill because he refused to help manufacture tank turrets) The Oregon courts followed these cases and awarded unemployment compensation to Smith and Black.
Thus, in a lawsuit where a constitutional rule conflicts with a statute or executive policy the court hearing the case must follow the Constitution and ignore the conflicting act.
Following the review's publication, Bishop Peter Hancock, the Church of England's lead safeguarding bishop, said: «At the heart of this case was a judgment, on the balance of probabilities, as to whether, in the event that her claim for compensation reached trial, a court would have concluded that Carol was abused by Bishop Bell.
The SCOTUS should conclude the following thereby ending this continuing waste of tax payers» money by trying these cases in court:
The following definition of atheism was given to the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Murray v. Curlett, 374 U.S. 203, 83 S. Ct. 1560, 10 L.Ed.2 d (MD, 1963), to remove reverential Bible reading and oral unison recitation of the Lord's Prayer in the public schools:
The document from the Equality and Human Rights Commission follows the European Court of Human Rights judgment in four cases about religious rights in the workplace, one of which found that an employee suffered a breach of her right to religious freedom for being told not to wear a cross at work.
Probably in consequence of cases like this, Paul goes on in I Corinthians 6 to give instructions for the setting up of Christian judges and Christian courts (following Jewish models).
The Court of Appeals quoted from the Chartreuse case as follows:
Such a recommendation is almost uniformly followed, but this time, juvenile court judge Louis Lerner ordered the case to circuit court after a preliminary hearing.
For more updates on the New Jersey Supreme Court case, be sure to follow us on twitter @SportsInsights and @ActionNetworkHQ
By Paul Nicholson March 4 — The five - year long New York court case following the sale of Liverpool Football Club to Fenway Sports Group revealed this week former owner George Gillett Jr is still paying # 125,000 a month in debt repayments for a loan secured against the club, and that the new owners felt that due to the aging playing squad the # 295 million price was in fact an overpayment for the asset.
The court awards custody in the following order of preference unless in a particular case the best interest of the child requires otherwise: to both parents jointly or to either parent; to a person or persons in whose home the child has been living and where the child has had a wholesome and stable environment; to any person related within the third degree of consanguinity; to any other person or persons whom the court finds suitable and able to provide proper care.
State laws differ, but courts generally consider the following factors when deciding custody cases:
The Federal High Court hearing the case in Abuja was forced to adjourn the case following the absence of four out of the six defendants in the matter.
Article5 (3) states as follows:» The court may entitle relevant Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) with observer status before the commission, and individuals to institute cases directly before it, in accordance with article34 (6) of this protocol.
A crowd of power plant protestors came to Lower Manhattan from Orange County to follow former top Cuomo aide Joe Percoco in the rain from federal court, where he attended a routine hearing in his bribery case, all the way to the subway, shouting, «Shame!»
Incompetence is when a running mate, during the supreme court petition case is asked the following: «Between a figure written on a cheque and the amount written in words - when in doubt, which one should a banker rely on?»
The conviction was one of the most touted victories of former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara's anti-corruption campaign, but the outcome was known to be in doubt because of the Supreme Court decision in a case involving former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, which followed Silver's trial.
The Dispatch Editor said he never bothered to follow up on the case until last year when the informant denied claims by the police at the court that their investigations unearth the evil plot to end the life of mogul.
This intriguing revelation by the ICC didn't come as a surprise to some of us who have been following this case since 2010 and have always been of the view that the Supreme Court of Ghana erred in linking Mr.Woyome's claims for works done for the state in 2005 to a waterville contract in 2006 on which basis it asked Mr.Woyome to refund all his entitlement paid him.
Haggerty's attorney, Paul Shechtman, filed a stay application on his client's behalf following Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman's decision last month that the high court will take up his case.
In the case of New Patriotic Party v. Attorney — General [1993 — 94] 2 GLR 35 (31st December Case), the Supreme Court expressed the following sentiments about unconstitutional conduct and the consequencase of New Patriotic Party v. Attorney — General [1993 — 94] 2 GLR 35 (31st December Case), the Supreme Court expressed the following sentiments about unconstitutional conduct and the consequenCase), the Supreme Court expressed the following sentiments about unconstitutional conduct and the consequences.
City Court prosecutors must also direct follow - up investigation, conduct legal research, respond to motions, obtain statements from witnesses, locate and secure evidence, conduct pre-trial hearings, and take cases to trial if they can not be resolved by a plea bargain.
Skelos and son Adam's case were wrongly instructed, in light of a Supreme Court decision following their 2015 convictions.
In the Upper West Region, Assistant State Attorney Saeed Abdul Shakur who had gone to court to file a case expressed frustrations at the turn of events following the strike.
While the summons served on Dasuki had been successfully executed, following which the ex-NSA had testified in the case, the court bailiff had yet to be able to serve Jonathan personally.
The Welsh secretary previously argued its «whites - only» membership policy was currently being changed following an aborted court case against it by the Equalities and Human Rights Commission (ECHR), but that while it was not reformed, it remained an illegal group.
According to him, since the case is now in court he will wait until it is called, adding he followed due process and will not get himself entangled in a dispute between the plaintiff and her family over the sold land.
Article 14 (1) Every person shall be entitled to his personal liberty and no person shall be deprived of his personal liberty except in the following cases and in accordance with procedure permitted by law; Article 19 (1) A person charged with a criminal offence shall be given a fair hearing within a reasonable time by a court; Article 19 (11) No person shall be convicted of a criminal offence unless the offence is defined and the penalty for it is prescribed in a written law; Article 19 (12) Clause (11) of this article shall not prevent a Superior Court from punishing a person for contempt of itself notwithstanding that the act or omission constitution the contempt is not defined in a written law and the penalty is not so prescribed; and Article 126 (2) The Superior Courts shall be superior courts of record and shall have the power to commit for contempt to themselves and all such powers as were vested in a court of record immediately before the coming into force of this constitucourt; Article 19 (11) No person shall be convicted of a criminal offence unless the offence is defined and the penalty for it is prescribed in a written law; Article 19 (12) Clause (11) of this article shall not prevent a Superior Court from punishing a person for contempt of itself notwithstanding that the act or omission constitution the contempt is not defined in a written law and the penalty is not so prescribed; and Article 126 (2) The Superior Courts shall be superior courts of record and shall have the power to commit for contempt to themselves and all such powers as were vested in a court of record immediately before the coming into force of this constituCourt from punishing a person for contempt of itself notwithstanding that the act or omission constitution the contempt is not defined in a written law and the penalty is not so prescribed; and Article 126 (2) The Superior Courts shall be superior courts of record and shall have the power to commit for contempt to themselves and all such powers as were vested in a court of record immediately before the coming into force of this constitCourts shall be superior courts of record and shall have the power to commit for contempt to themselves and all such powers as were vested in a court of record immediately before the coming into force of this constitcourts of record and shall have the power to commit for contempt to themselves and all such powers as were vested in a court of record immediately before the coming into force of this constitucourt of record immediately before the coming into force of this constitution.
According to Justice Bello, it was too early for the police to start its case with hostility when it has not followed laid down rules of the court and the constitution.
«The High Court's judgment is not a surprise to anyone who has been following this case, and the UK government should now accept this decision rather than take it to the UK Supreme Court.
The attorney for former Sen. George Maziarz is trying to have his corruption case tossed from state court following Sen. Robert Ortt's related case being dismissed as well.
Nassau County Legislator Carrié Solages appeared in court in his domestic violence case following his November re-election, with his lawyer signaling the Democratic official wants to talk to prosecutors about a possible end to the matter.
«The court case going on right now against the Democrats and Governor Malloy is exactly why we need strong anticorruption laws on the books and why we need to follow them.»
In a judgment dismissing the claim, Justice Rilwan Aikawa held that following the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Attorney General of Ondo State vs Attorney General of the Federation and 36 Others (2002), that ICPC had a statutory duty to investigate allegations of corrupt practices made against any person or authority in Nigeria and that neither the claimants nor the court has the discretion to stop a statutory agency of government from performing its duCourt in the case of Attorney General of Ondo State vs Attorney General of the Federation and 36 Others (2002), that ICPC had a statutory duty to investigate allegations of corrupt practices made against any person or authority in Nigeria and that neither the claimants nor the court has the discretion to stop a statutory agency of government from performing its ducourt has the discretion to stop a statutory agency of government from performing its duties.
It assesses each of the 135 measures, and makes the case for enhanced operational cooperation, but argues that none of this necessitates that Britain follow the path towards a harmonised EU criminal code, decided by qualified majority voting, and enforced by the Commission, the European Court of Justice and — in due course — an EU Public Prosecutor.
To the lawyers reading this article I say the following: if this interpretation does not sit well with your legal conscience, then consider that the Supreme Court has departed from its previous ruling in the previous Abu Ramadan case, as it is entitled so to do.
«In our view, following the previous decision of this court in the Abu Ramadan case (supra) by which the use of the cards for registration was declared unconstitutional, the continued presence of names on the register that derive their identification from the said cards renders the register not reasonably accurate or credible.
A Magistrate Court sitting in Osogbo, Osun state capital has on Tuesday issued a bench warrant against the Oluwo of Iwo, Oba Adewale Akanbi following his refusal to appear in court in a case instituted by the Oluwo of Iwo Oke, Oba Kadiri AdCourt sitting in Osogbo, Osun state capital has on Tuesday issued a bench warrant against the Oluwo of Iwo, Oba Adewale Akanbi following his refusal to appear in court in a case instituted by the Oluwo of Iwo Oke, Oba Kadiri Adcourt in a case instituted by the Oluwo of Iwo Oke, Oba Kadiri Adeoye.
Following this, they prayed the court for another adjournment with the view that the case would be resolved by then.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z