We're
following the court case very closely and we are looking into the issue ourselves,» he said.
And
following a court case in the summer I ordered that the widespread use of this power should stop.
The baby was taken by social workers
following a court case described by Mrs Justice Pauffley as «profoundly alarming».
Not exact matches
Bounce then
followed this up with a second
case — this one filed in a Texas
court in April 2016 — repeating these allegations, also accusing Yieldify of patent infringement, and adding some of Yieldify's customers as defendants.
Current views on whether an asset is a security tends to
follow the «Howey Test,» which comes from a 1946 U.S. Supreme
Court case.
The
case against Shrem has been a beacon to bitcoin community businesses warning them about the significance of regulatory compliance and
following the rules of the game, which was also a theme that arose during
court.
In the
case where an employee may have inappropriately disclosed a trade secret, the
courts will examine the
following in order to establish wrongdoing:
The French decision
follows the May ruling by the European
Court of Justice (ECJ) in the
case of Mario Costeja González, a Spanish man who succeeded in ordering Google to remove links to an old article saying that his home was being repossessed to pay off debts.
In previous
cases recorded by the human rights organizations, citizens were denied access to plane tickets because they failed to
follow a
court ruling.
After March 4, 2013, an International Arrest Warrant will be issued against these Defendants.The guilty verdict
followed nearly a month of deliberations by more than thirty sworn Citizen Jurors of the 150
case exhibits produced by
Court Prosecutors, The
Court's judgement declares the wealth and property of the churches responsible for the Canadian genocide to be forfeited and placed under public ownership, as reparations for the families of the more than 50,000 children who died in the residential schools.To enforce its sentence, the
Court has empowered citizens in Canada, the United States, England, Italy and a dozen other nations to act as its legal agents armed with warrants, and peacefully occupy and seize properties of the Roman Catholic, Anglican and United Church of Canada, which are the main agents in the deaths of these children
Employees who refuse to work on their sabbath have been the principal beneficiaries of this rule (in another
case a worker lost his job in a brass mill because he refused to help manufacture tank turrets) The Oregon
courts followed these
cases and awarded unemployment compensation to Smith and Black.
Thus, in a lawsuit where a constitutional rule conflicts with a statute or executive policy the
court hearing the
case must
follow the Constitution and ignore the conflicting act.
Following the review's publication, Bishop Peter Hancock, the Church of England's lead safeguarding bishop, said: «At the heart of this
case was a judgment, on the balance of probabilities, as to whether, in the event that her claim for compensation reached trial, a
court would have concluded that Carol was abused by Bishop Bell.
The SCOTUS should conclude the
following thereby ending this continuing waste of tax payers» money by trying these
cases in
court:
The
following definition of atheism was given to the Supreme
Court of the United States in the
case of Murray v. Curlett, 374 U.S. 203, 83 S. Ct. 1560, 10 L.Ed.2 d (MD, 1963), to remove reverential Bible reading and oral unison recitation of the Lord's Prayer in the public schools:
The document from the Equality and Human Rights Commission
follows the European
Court of Human Rights judgment in four
cases about religious rights in the workplace, one of which found that an employee suffered a breach of her right to religious freedom for being told not to wear a cross at work.
Probably in consequence of
cases like this, Paul goes on in I Corinthians 6 to give instructions for the setting up of Christian judges and Christian
courts (
following Jewish models).
The
Court of Appeals quoted from the Chartreuse
case as
follows:
Such a recommendation is almost uniformly
followed, but this time, juvenile
court judge Louis Lerner ordered the
case to circuit
court after a preliminary hearing.
For more updates on the New Jersey Supreme
Court case, be sure to
follow us on twitter @SportsInsights and @ActionNetworkHQ
By Paul Nicholson March 4 — The five - year long New York
court case following the sale of Liverpool Football Club to Fenway Sports Group revealed this week former owner George Gillett Jr is still paying # 125,000 a month in debt repayments for a loan secured against the club, and that the new owners felt that due to the aging playing squad the # 295 million price was in fact an overpayment for the asset.
The
court awards custody in the
following order of preference unless in a particular
case the best interest of the child requires otherwise: to both parents jointly or to either parent; to a person or persons in whose home the child has been living and where the child has had a wholesome and stable environment; to any person related within the third degree of consanguinity; to any other person or persons whom the
court finds suitable and able to provide proper care.
State laws differ, but
courts generally consider the
following factors when deciding custody
cases:
The Federal High
Court hearing the
case in Abuja was forced to adjourn the
case following the absence of four out of the six defendants in the matter.
Article5 (3) states as
follows:» The
court may entitle relevant Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) with observer status before the commission, and individuals to institute
cases directly before it, in accordance with article34 (6) of this protocol.
A crowd of power plant protestors came to Lower Manhattan from Orange County to
follow former top Cuomo aide Joe Percoco in the rain from federal
court, where he attended a routine hearing in his bribery
case, all the way to the subway, shouting, «Shame!»
Incompetence is when a running mate, during the supreme
court petition
case is asked the
following: «Between a figure written on a cheque and the amount written in words - when in doubt, which one should a banker rely on?»
The conviction was one of the most touted victories of former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara's anti-corruption campaign, but the outcome was known to be in doubt because of the Supreme
Court decision in a
case involving former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, which
followed Silver's trial.
The Dispatch Editor said he never bothered to
follow up on the
case until last year when the informant denied claims by the police at the
court that their investigations unearth the evil plot to end the life of mogul.
This intriguing revelation by the ICC didn't come as a surprise to some of us who have been
following this
case since 2010 and have always been of the view that the Supreme
Court of Ghana erred in linking Mr.Woyome's claims for works done for the state in 2005 to a waterville contract in 2006 on which basis it asked Mr.Woyome to refund all his entitlement paid him.
Haggerty's attorney, Paul Shechtman, filed a stay application on his client's behalf
following Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman's decision last month that the high
court will take up his
case.
In the
case of New Patriotic Party v. Attorney — General [1993 — 94] 2 GLR 35 (31st December Case), the Supreme Court expressed the following sentiments about unconstitutional conduct and the consequen
case of New Patriotic Party v. Attorney — General [1993 — 94] 2 GLR 35 (31st December
Case), the Supreme Court expressed the following sentiments about unconstitutional conduct and the consequen
Case), the Supreme
Court expressed the
following sentiments about unconstitutional conduct and the consequences.
City
Court prosecutors must also direct
follow - up investigation, conduct legal research, respond to motions, obtain statements from witnesses, locate and secure evidence, conduct pre-trial hearings, and take
cases to trial if they can not be resolved by a plea bargain.
Skelos and son Adam's
case were wrongly instructed, in light of a Supreme
Court decision
following their 2015 convictions.
In the Upper West Region, Assistant State Attorney Saeed Abdul Shakur who had gone to
court to file a
case expressed frustrations at the turn of events
following the strike.
While the summons served on Dasuki had been successfully executed,
following which the ex-NSA had testified in the
case, the
court bailiff had yet to be able to serve Jonathan personally.
The Welsh secretary previously argued its «whites - only» membership policy was currently being changed
following an aborted
court case against it by the Equalities and Human Rights Commission (ECHR), but that while it was not reformed, it remained an illegal group.
According to him, since the
case is now in
court he will wait until it is called, adding he
followed due process and will not get himself entangled in a dispute between the plaintiff and her family over the sold land.
Article 14 (1) Every person shall be entitled to his personal liberty and no person shall be deprived of his personal liberty except in the
following cases and in accordance with procedure permitted by law; Article 19 (1) A person charged with a criminal offence shall be given a fair hearing within a reasonable time by a
court; Article 19 (11) No person shall be convicted of a criminal offence unless the offence is defined and the penalty for it is prescribed in a written law; Article 19 (12) Clause (11) of this article shall not prevent a Superior Court from punishing a person for contempt of itself notwithstanding that the act or omission constitution the contempt is not defined in a written law and the penalty is not so prescribed; and Article 126 (2) The Superior Courts shall be superior courts of record and shall have the power to commit for contempt to themselves and all such powers as were vested in a court of record immediately before the coming into force of this constitu
court; Article 19 (11) No person shall be convicted of a criminal offence unless the offence is defined and the penalty for it is prescribed in a written law; Article 19 (12) Clause (11) of this article shall not prevent a Superior
Court from punishing a person for contempt of itself notwithstanding that the act or omission constitution the contempt is not defined in a written law and the penalty is not so prescribed; and Article 126 (2) The Superior Courts shall be superior courts of record and shall have the power to commit for contempt to themselves and all such powers as were vested in a court of record immediately before the coming into force of this constitu
Court from punishing a person for contempt of itself notwithstanding that the act or omission constitution the contempt is not defined in a written law and the penalty is not so prescribed; and Article 126 (2) The Superior
Courts shall be superior courts of record and shall have the power to commit for contempt to themselves and all such powers as were vested in a court of record immediately before the coming into force of this constit
Courts shall be superior
courts of record and shall have the power to commit for contempt to themselves and all such powers as were vested in a court of record immediately before the coming into force of this constit
courts of record and shall have the power to commit for contempt to themselves and all such powers as were vested in a
court of record immediately before the coming into force of this constitu
court of record immediately before the coming into force of this constitution.
According to Justice Bello, it was too early for the police to start its
case with hostility when it has not
followed laid down rules of the
court and the constitution.
«The High
Court's judgment is not a surprise to anyone who has been
following this
case, and the UK government should now accept this decision rather than take it to the UK Supreme
Court.
The attorney for former Sen. George Maziarz is trying to have his corruption
case tossed from state
court following Sen. Robert Ortt's related
case being dismissed as well.
Nassau County Legislator Carrié Solages appeared in
court in his domestic violence
case following his November re-election, with his lawyer signaling the Democratic official wants to talk to prosecutors about a possible end to the matter.
«The
court case going on right now against the Democrats and Governor Malloy is exactly why we need strong anticorruption laws on the books and why we need to
follow them.»
In a judgment dismissing the claim, Justice Rilwan Aikawa held that
following the decision of the Supreme
Court in the case of Attorney General of Ondo State vs Attorney General of the Federation and 36 Others (2002), that ICPC had a statutory duty to investigate allegations of corrupt practices made against any person or authority in Nigeria and that neither the claimants nor the court has the discretion to stop a statutory agency of government from performing its du
Court in the
case of Attorney General of Ondo State vs Attorney General of the Federation and 36 Others (2002), that ICPC had a statutory duty to investigate allegations of corrupt practices made against any person or authority in Nigeria and that neither the claimants nor the
court has the discretion to stop a statutory agency of government from performing its du
court has the discretion to stop a statutory agency of government from performing its duties.
It assesses each of the 135 measures, and makes the
case for enhanced operational cooperation, but argues that none of this necessitates that Britain
follow the path towards a harmonised EU criminal code, decided by qualified majority voting, and enforced by the Commission, the European
Court of Justice and — in due course — an EU Public Prosecutor.
To the lawyers reading this article I say the
following: if this interpretation does not sit well with your legal conscience, then consider that the Supreme
Court has departed from its previous ruling in the previous Abu Ramadan
case, as it is entitled so to do.
«In our view,
following the previous decision of this
court in the Abu Ramadan
case (supra) by which the use of the cards for registration was declared unconstitutional, the continued presence of names on the register that derive their identification from the said cards renders the register not reasonably accurate or credible.
A Magistrate
Court sitting in Osogbo, Osun state capital has on Tuesday issued a bench warrant against the Oluwo of Iwo, Oba Adewale Akanbi following his refusal to appear in court in a case instituted by the Oluwo of Iwo Oke, Oba Kadiri Ad
Court sitting in Osogbo, Osun state capital has on Tuesday issued a bench warrant against the Oluwo of Iwo, Oba Adewale Akanbi
following his refusal to appear in
court in a case instituted by the Oluwo of Iwo Oke, Oba Kadiri Ad
court in a
case instituted by the Oluwo of Iwo Oke, Oba Kadiri Adeoye.
Following this, they prayed the
court for another adjournment with the view that the
case would be resolved by then.