Sentences with phrase «following a court injunction»

The North Tongue parliamentary primaries was postponed following court injunction place on it by an Accra High Court.

The EC said it was temporary decision following a court injunction secured by the Progressive People's Party (PPP) over the filling fees.

Not exact matches

More recently, in In re NYSE Euronext Shareholders Litigation, then - Chancellor Strine of the Delaware Court of Chancery, in a bench ruling following oral argument, declined to issue a preliminary injunction on a stockholder vote to approve the proposed merger between NYSE Euronext («NYSE Euronext») and IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. («ICE»).

This followed an injunction which the federal high court, Abeokuta, granted against the company on Friday.

But Weiser and her colleagues maintain that in the absence of an injunction or other court action, LATFOR has no choice BUT to follow the law.

The Act's relevance has also been called into question following a recent successful application for a court injunction by the Motion Picture Association, a group representing film studios, forcing BT to block access to a website called Newzbin2, which did not make use of the Act.

The injunction against the Sun follows a High Court order on Friday blocking a BBC report which centred on the same email.

Following the conviction of Abuga Pele and Philip Assibit over the GYEEDA scandal, the MP for Bawku Central, Mahama Ayariga, will, next week, start a chain of events that may result in an injunction at the Supreme Court against the operations of a number of state agencies.

This follows the dismissal of an injunction suit filed by the Progressive People's Party (PPP), by an Accra High court protesting the payment of the fees.

Over the next 2 or 3 months, the lower courts will follow the high court's instructions, and the injunction will be presumably lifted, and NASA will have to decide how to proceed once the injunction is lifted.

The injunction — which freezes the mandate to reduce carbon pollution from the US power grid pending an appeals court ruling, presumably followed by an appeal to the high court — came on a 5 - 4 vote, just days before Justice Antonin Scalia's unexpected death roiled the national political climate.

This judgment followed on from the well - known decision of Mr Justice Birss in Unwired Planet v Huawei where he determined that the English High Court had jurisdiction to determine portfolio FRAND on a global basis and could grant a so called FRAND injunction against a defendant if it chose not to enter into the licence on the terms determined by the Court.

The following factors are considered in determining recognition and enforceability of a Alaska injunction: (a) are the terms of the order clear and specific enough to ensure that the defendant will know what is expected; (b) is the order limited in its scope and did the originating court retain the power to issue further orders; (c) is the enforcement the least burdensome remedy for the Canadian justice system; (d) is the Canadian litigant exposed to unforeseen obligations; (e) are any third parties affected by the order; and (f) will the use of judicial resources be consistent with what would be allowed for domestic litigants.

And if «exceptionally» the court does need to consider whether to grant an injunction where the relief sought is substantially identical to an ASBO it should follow the approach in McCann.

It followed according to the Court that there was a legitimate expectation on the part of a willing licensee not to face an injunction or an action for a product recall provided certain conditions were met.

Following an early 2015 day long evidentiary TRO and Preliminary Injunction hearing in Utah's Fourth District Court, Kelly Nash and Jordan Cameron obtained a stipulated $ 500,000 judgment of breach of non-competition and trade secret misappropriation claims.

The following factors are considered in determining recognition and enforceability of a Georgia injunction: (a) are the terms of the order clear and specific enough to ensure that the defendant will know what is expected; (b) is the order limited in its scope and did the originating court retain the power to issue further orders; (c) is the enforcement the least burdensome remedy for the Canadian justice system; (d) is the Canadian litigant exposed to unforeseen obligations; (e) are any third parties affected by the order; and (f) will the use of judicial resources be consistent with what would be allowed for domestic litigants.

In addition to having been instructed in major arbitrations, such as the Bermudan - based arbitration relating to the reinsurance of Arthur Andersen following the collapse of Enron and WorldCom, and Elektrim SA's long running dispute with Vivendi Universal over Polish telecommunications, he has particular expertise in relation to inter relief applications to the Court in relation to heavy arbitrations such as ETI Euro Telecom V Republic of Bolivia [2008](no pre-emptive relief in aid of an ICSID arbitration); Elektrim SA v Vivendi [2007] 1 Lloyd's Rep 693 (s. 68 of AA 1996 and awards obtained by fraud); Elektrim v Vivendi [2007] 2 Lloyd's Rep 8 (injunction to restrain arbitration continuing) Telenor East Holding II AS v Altimo Holdings & Investments Ltd (multi-billion dollar shareholder dispute — interim injunction under s. 44 of the AA 1996); Steadfast v Baker Hughes (s. 9 (3) step in the action preventing a stay in favour of arbitration) and enforcement of arbitral awards (Yukos v Rosneft: US$ 500m and Yukos v Russian Federation US$ 50 billion.

The company was granted a temporary injunction by the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court last September; but an arbitral award did not follow.

The English injunction was continued the following week after a fully contested High Court hearing and all the seized documents were returned to our London office within a week, held by us subject to a privilege review by independent counsel.

The ruling follows a Law Society court action to secure an injunction against the «Solicitors from Hell» website to protect its members and the public, on the grounds the site was not a credible source of reliable information about solicitors.

The following factors are considered in determining recognition and enforceability of a Tennessee injunction: (a) are the terms of the order clear and specific enough to ensure that the defendant will know what is expected; (b) is the order limited in its scope and did the originating court retain the power to issue further orders; (c) is the enforcement the least burdensome remedy for the Canadian justice system; (d) is the Canadian litigant exposed to unforeseen obligations; (e) are any third parties affected by the order; and (f) will the use of judicial resources be consistent with what would be allowed for domestic litigants.

The following factors are considered in determining recognition and enforceability of a Missouri injunction: (a) are the terms of the order clear and specific enough to ensure that the defendant will know what is expected; (b) is the order limited in its scope and did the originating court retain the power to issue further orders; (c) is the enforcement the least burdensome remedy for the Canadian justice system; (d) is the Canadian litigant exposed to unforeseen obligations; (e) are any third parties affected by the order; and (f) will the use of judicial resources be consistent with what would be allowed for domestic litigants.

The following factors are considered in determining recognition and enforceability of a California injunction: (a) are the terms of the order clear and specific enough to ensure that the defendant will know what is expected; (b) is the order limited in its scope and did the originating court retain the power to issue further orders; (c) is the enforcement the least burdensome remedy for the Canadian justice system; (d) is the Canadian litigant exposed to unforeseen obligations; (e) are any third parties affected by the order; and (f) will the use of judicial resources be consistent with what would be allowed for domestic litigants.

Notable cases in which Pierre was involved included an appeal against deprivation of citizenship on national security grounds following remittal to SIAC by the Supreme Court in the case of Pham («B2»); an appeal concerning registration under the statelessness provisions of the British Nationality Act 1981 in the case of MK (India); three out of hours applications for injunctions successfully preventing same - day removal and numerous challenges to Home Office policy and the Immigration Rules.

The following factors are considered in determining recognition and enforceability of a North Carolina injunction: (a) are the terms of the order clear and specific enough to ensure that the defendant will know what is expected; (b) is the order limited in its scope and did the originating court retain the power to issue further orders; (c) is the enforcement the least burdensome remedy for the Canadian justice system; (d) is the Canadian litigant exposed to unforeseen obligations; (e) are any third parties affected by the order; and (f) will the use of judicial resources be consistent with what would be allowed for domestic litigants.

Today Apple filed its opposition to Samsung's motion for a swift remand of the Galaxy Tab 10.1 preliminary injunction to the district court, following Judge Koh's indicative ruling that the jury verdict, which did not hold Samsung to infringe the D'889 tablet design patent on which the sales ban is based, raised a substantial question.

The well - established legal test for an Injunction comes from a Supreme Court of Canada case called R.J.R. MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), and requires that the following questions be addressed by the court charged with the task of considering the Injunction applicaCourt of Canada case called R.J.R. MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), and requires that the following questions be addressed by the court charged with the task of considering the Injunction applicacourt charged with the task of considering the Injunction application:

Following an «emergency hearing held by telephone on [a] Friday night», the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia recently refused to grant an injunction restraining the Halifax Herald from publishing a story using a five hour digital recording of a conversation between Minister Raitt and her former press secretary, Jasmine MacDonnell.

Grieg v Kritikopoulou 2017 ONSC 4594 sets out the Supreme Court of Canada test for the granting of an interlocutory injunction to restrain certain activity 11 The moving party must meet the following three - part test to success on a motion seeking an interlocutory injunction: a)... Read more

In BDO Cayman v Argyle Funds, reported by Harneys, the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands followed English and Australian authority in having an anti-suit injunction followed by a cost order against the party that had infringed choice of cCourt of the Cayman Islands followed English and Australian authority in having an anti-suit injunction followed by a cost order against the party that had infringed choice of courtcourt.

The following factors are considered in determining recognition and enforceability of a foreign injunction: (a) are the terms of the order clear and specific enough to ensure that the defendant will know what is expected; (b) is the order limited in its scope and did the originating court retain the power to issue further orders; (c) is the enforcement the least burdensome remedy for the Canadian justice system; (d) is the Canadian litigant exposed to unforeseen obligations; (e) are any third parties affected by the order; and (f) will the use of judicial resources be consistent with what would be allowed for domestic litigants.

Following the Supreme Court decision in Coventry v Lawrence, when will the court give an injunctiCourt decision in Coventry v Lawrence, when will the court give an injuncticourt give an injunction...

The changes follow a decision by the Ontario Superior Court in Wahgoshig First Nation v. Solid Gold Resources Corp. on Sept. 4 to allow an appeal of an interim injunction obtained by Wahgoshig First Nation that ordered Solid Gold to stop all activity for 120 days and consult with the province and the First Nation.

A «remedy» through the courts — perhaps an injunction to stop interfering with X's system — would not be available until well into the following year... if X survives the loss of the big retail season.

A springboard injunction is defined by Haddon - Cave J as follows: «Where a person has obtained a «head start» as a result of unlawful acts, the court has the power to grant an injunction to restrain the wrongdoer, so as to deprive him of the fruits of his unlawful acts.

«Cause» shall mean any of the following events: (i) breach by either party of any of its obligations hereunder; (ii) misappropriation by either party of funds or property of the other party; (iii) any court injunction or judgment against either party relating to copyright or trademark infringement, or other unethical business practices; or (iv) the failure by either party to fulfill any of its obligations hereunder (v) vendor's non-compliance with state or local requirements.

Most major cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple and Litecoin fell sharply on Wednesday following a U.S. court injunction that says cryptocurrencies fall under the Commodity Exchange Act.

Generally, an injunction prohibits an individual from taking certain actions and allows the other spouse to ask the court to impose penalties, such as jail time, if the injunction is not followed.

Following the filing of the lawsuit, the court entered an injunction barring the Association from operating the MLS until the court could resolve the election issues.

Editor's Note: Following the ruling in favor of the Challenger on the due process claims, the court entered a permanent injunction against the State from making the public disclosures required in the Law and also granted the Challenger's motion for class certification (see Doe v. Lee, No. 3:99 CV314 (RNC), 2001 WL 536729 (D. Conn..

The court ordered the entry of an injunction and made the following declaratory judgments: