The exhibition could be considered a way of exploring the art of the theatre through the use of other art forms,
following a distinction pointed out by the British playwright Howard Barker between «the theatre» and «the art of the theatre».
Not exact matches
From the thesis that God could have created some other world it
follows that there are unrealized potentialities for God, namely, His creating worlds He does not create.10 Thomas»
distinction between active and passive potentialities11 does nothing to invalidate this
point.
I make these general remarks about the two sorts of judgment, because there are many religious persons — some of you now present, possibly, are among them — who do not yet make a working use of the
distinction, and who may therefore feel at first a little startled at the purely existential
point of view from which in the
following lectures the phenomena of religious experience must be considered.
What
follows, therefore, will be an attempt to sketch out a few
distinctions and to
point out a few first steps that might be taken toward an eventual solution.
i hope some of these
points and
distinctions will be taken to heart by those who
follow this blog.
In the case at hand, the
point of view on gun laws simply seems to roughly
follow the political
distinctions of «liberal» versus «conservative» in the way that «conservative» politicians tend to not want to change the existing (perceived by many, liberal) gun laws.
Rather, I want to take a step back from the particulars of the conversation between Horton and McLaren and ask the
following question: what is the
point of drawing — or of failing to draw — a
distinction between SRM and CDR?