The following applications for permission to file an amicus / amici curiae brief in support of plaintiffs / respondents / cross-appellants Andrea Savaglio et al. are granted: (1) Asian Pacific American Legal Center of Southern California et al., (2) La Raza Centro Legal and Equal Rights Advocates, (3), California Employment Lawyers Association, and (4) Alameda County Central Labor Council et al..
Not exact matches
For that reason it is important to avoid or mitigate the risk of judicial review of the planning
permission by ensuring that all the relevant procedural steps have been
followed in the
application process, and all relevant issues have been addressed.
In addition:
For content that is covered by intellectual property rights, like photos and videos («IP content»), you specifically give us the
following permission, subject to your privacy and
application settings: you grant us a non-exclusive, transferable, sub-licensable, royalty - free, worldwide license to use any IP content that you post on or in connection with Facebook («IP License»).
In Karkut & Ors, R (on the
application of) v London Borough of Lewisham [2005] EWHC 354 Collins J said,
following Webb v Bristol City Council [2001] EWHC Admin Civ 696, that the better course was to
for a judge to consider granting interim relief before considering the issue of
permission.
Following a contested hearing on consequential matters, E was also awarded 100 % of her costs, and successfully opposed the local authority's
application for permission to appeal.
«TCC claims 2.1 The
following are examples of the types of claim which it may be appropriate to bring as TCC claims --(a) building or other construction disputes, including claims
for the enforcement of the decisions of adjudicators under the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996; (b) engineering disputes; (c) claims by and against engineers, architects, surveyors, accountants and other specialised advisers relating to the services they provide; (d) claims by and against local authorities relating to their statutory duties concerning the development of land or the construction of buildings; (e) claims relating to the design, supply and installation of computers, computer software and related network systems; (f) claims relating to the quality of goods sold or hired, and work done, materials supplied or services rendered; (g) claims between landlord and tenant
for breach of a repairing covenant; (h) claims between neighbours, owners and occupiers of land in trespass, nuisance etc; (i) claims relating to the environment (
for example, pollution cases); (j) claims arising out of fires; (k) claims involving taking of accounts where these are complicated; and (l) challenges to decisions of arbitrators in construction and engineering disputes including
applications for permission to appeal and appeals.»
Arbitration —
Application for permission to appeal — Running of time for permission to appeal following an application to the arbitrators for amendments to the award under the slip rule — Extension of time for the grant of permission to appeal — Arbitration Act 1996, sections 57, 69,
Application for permission to appeal — Running of time
for permission to appeal
following an
application to the arbitrators for amendments to the award under the slip rule — Extension of time for the grant of permission to appeal — Arbitration Act 1996, sections 57, 69,
application to the arbitrators
for amendments to the award under the slip rule — Extension of time
for the grant of
permission to appeal — Arbitration Act 1996, sections 57, 69, 70 and 80.
Hardy handled a planning appeal
for Energiekontor concerning the extension of a wind farm in Yorkshire, which resulted in in the granting of planning
permission, and also represented Midland Pig Producers in an appeal over an environmental permit
application, which was granted
following an inquiry.
Fourth, because of the particular issues that arose when
permission to appeal had already been granted, it would be easier in future in such cases if the
application for EOT was listed with appeal to
follow.
This procedure was not
followed in Buglife; the respondent's case was not put before the court on paper before the
applications for permission to appeal and
for a PCO were considered by the single Lord Justice.
IT Support Engineer — Ellis Memorial Hospital — Sacramento, CA — February 2015 - present • Provide desktop support
for more than 300 doctors, nurses, and hospital technicians • Maintain and troubleshoot network of 500 computer and mobile devices • Create internal documentation
for software / Cloud - based
application use • Cable new hospital wing and integrate into larger network, migrating user accounts from previous systemComputer Support Specialist — LearningTech — Austin, TX — January 2013 - June 2015 • Set up new user accounts on the content management system, email exchange server, and trouble ticket system • Provided in - person and remote support to more than 50 customers • Ran help desk and resolved issues with guaranteed response time of 24 - 36 hours • Set user
permissions following company security guidelines
In addition:
For content that is covered by intellectual property rights, like photos and videos (IP content), you specifically give us the
following permission, subject to your privacy and
application settings: you grant us a non-exclusive, transferable, sub-licensable, royalty - free, worldwide license to use any IP content that you post on or in connection with Facebook (IP License).