Sentences with phrase «following brands of formula»

Q3.8 For each of the following brands of formula milk, please indicate how you feel about the brand using the scale provided [from «I love it» to «I hate it»].

Not exact matches

Marius Berlemann, ProWein Director and Global Head of Wine & Spirits at Messe Düsseldorf, stated: «Having followed our highly successful global formula which brings together an international variety of wine brands and producers under one roof, we are extremely pleased to see this internationality reflected here at ProWine ASIA.

Anxious mothers consulting HVs recommended changing to other brands of formula; one HV recommending follow - on formula for 6 month + baby.

Nestlé's aggressive baby milk marketing practices are ever more obvious in the UK following its takeover of the SMA formula brand in 2012.

For example, the formula brand name should not be the focus of labels: the type of milk («infant milk», «follow - on milk») should be in text at least as large (past analysis here, quoting regulations).

That this House is concerned that the provisions of the Infant Formula and Follow - on Formula Regulations 2007 are disrespected in the UK, as evidenced by the current promotion for Nestlé SMA infant formula by Tesco in breach of Article 23 of that regulation, the near identical labelling of infant and follow - on formula to make them cross-promotional in breach of Article 19 of that regulation, the widespread advertising of infant formula brand names and logos in breach of Article 21 of that regulation and the use of idealising text and images on labels in breach of Article 17 of that regulation; therefore rejects the Department of Health's proposals to decriminalise certain of those requirements, such as labelling provisions in planned draft legislative proposals, related to EU Regulation 609/2015 which will replace these 2007 regulations; and stresses that any move to a system of Improvement Notices must have the purpose of speeding up compliance and be backed by prosecutions rather than giving companies who have flouted the law for many years additional time to Formula and Follow - on Formula Regulations 2007 are disrespected in the UK, as evidenced by the current promotion for Nestlé SMA infant formula by Tesco in breach of Article 23 of that regulation, the near identical labelling of infant and follow - on formula to make them cross-promotional in breach of Article 19 of that regulation, the widespread advertising of infant formula brand names and logos in breach of Article 21 of that regulation and the use of idealising text and images on labels in breach of Article 17 of that regulation; therefore rejects the Department of Health's proposals to decriminalise certain of those requirements, such as labelling provisions in planned draft legislative proposals, related to EU Regulation 609/2015 which will replace these 2007 regulations; and stresses that any move to a system of Improvement Notices must have the purpose of speeding up compliance and be backed by prosecutions rather than giving companies who have flouted the law for many years additional time to cFollow - on Formula Regulations 2007 are disrespected in the UK, as evidenced by the current promotion for Nestlé SMA infant formula by Tesco in breach of Article 23 of that regulation, the near identical labelling of infant and follow - on formula to make them cross-promotional in breach of Article 19 of that regulation, the widespread advertising of infant formula brand names and logos in breach of Article 21 of that regulation and the use of idealising text and images on labels in breach of Article 17 of that regulation; therefore rejects the Department of Health's proposals to decriminalise certain of those requirements, such as labelling provisions in planned draft legislative proposals, related to EU Regulation 609/2015 which will replace these 2007 regulations; and stresses that any move to a system of Improvement Notices must have the purpose of speeding up compliance and be backed by prosecutions rather than giving companies who have flouted the law for many years additional time to Formula Regulations 2007 are disrespected in the UK, as evidenced by the current promotion for Nestlé SMA infant formula by Tesco in breach of Article 23 of that regulation, the near identical labelling of infant and follow - on formula to make them cross-promotional in breach of Article 19 of that regulation, the widespread advertising of infant formula brand names and logos in breach of Article 21 of that regulation and the use of idealising text and images on labels in breach of Article 17 of that regulation; therefore rejects the Department of Health's proposals to decriminalise certain of those requirements, such as labelling provisions in planned draft legislative proposals, related to EU Regulation 609/2015 which will replace these 2007 regulations; and stresses that any move to a system of Improvement Notices must have the purpose of speeding up compliance and be backed by prosecutions rather than giving companies who have flouted the law for many years additional time to formula by Tesco in breach of Article 23 of that regulation, the near identical labelling of infant and follow - on formula to make them cross-promotional in breach of Article 19 of that regulation, the widespread advertising of infant formula brand names and logos in breach of Article 21 of that regulation and the use of idealising text and images on labels in breach of Article 17 of that regulation; therefore rejects the Department of Health's proposals to decriminalise certain of those requirements, such as labelling provisions in planned draft legislative proposals, related to EU Regulation 609/2015 which will replace these 2007 regulations; and stresses that any move to a system of Improvement Notices must have the purpose of speeding up compliance and be backed by prosecutions rather than giving companies who have flouted the law for many years additional time to cfollow - on formula to make them cross-promotional in breach of Article 19 of that regulation, the widespread advertising of infant formula brand names and logos in breach of Article 21 of that regulation and the use of idealising text and images on labels in breach of Article 17 of that regulation; therefore rejects the Department of Health's proposals to decriminalise certain of those requirements, such as labelling provisions in planned draft legislative proposals, related to EU Regulation 609/2015 which will replace these 2007 regulations; and stresses that any move to a system of Improvement Notices must have the purpose of speeding up compliance and be backed by prosecutions rather than giving companies who have flouted the law for many years additional time to formula to make them cross-promotional in breach of Article 19 of that regulation, the widespread advertising of infant formula brand names and logos in breach of Article 21 of that regulation and the use of idealising text and images on labels in breach of Article 17 of that regulation; therefore rejects the Department of Health's proposals to decriminalise certain of those requirements, such as labelling provisions in planned draft legislative proposals, related to EU Regulation 609/2015 which will replace these 2007 regulations; and stresses that any move to a system of Improvement Notices must have the purpose of speeding up compliance and be backed by prosecutions rather than giving companies who have flouted the law for many years additional time to formula brand names and logos in breach of Article 21 of that regulation and the use of idealising text and images on labels in breach of Article 17 of that regulation; therefore rejects the Department of Health's proposals to decriminalise certain of those requirements, such as labelling provisions in planned draft legislative proposals, related to EU Regulation 609/2015 which will replace these 2007 regulations; and stresses that any move to a system of Improvement Notices must have the purpose of speeding up compliance and be backed by prosecutions rather than giving companies who have flouted the law for many years additional time to comply.

Baby Milk Action press release 8 September 2015 Nestlé's aggressive baby milk marketing practices are ever more obvious in the UK following its takeover of the SMA formula brand in 2012.

«With Nestlé's entry into the UK market following its takeover of Pfizer Nutrition / Wyeth and the SMA formula brand, we are seeing the more aggressive marketing practices it uses around the world appearing here.

We are finding Danone is becoming more aggressive in the UK, perhaps due to Nestlé's entry into the UK market following the completion of its takeover of Pfizer Nutrition / Wyeth and the SMA brand of formula (we have a Say NO to Nestlé campaign).

Following Nestlé's entry into the UK and Irish formula markets in December 2012, when it finalised its takeover of Pfizer Nutrition / Wyeth and the SMA brand, we are starting to see more aggressive baby milk marketing practices, both from Nestlé and...

Prices of formula in China have been increasing markedly in the past few years, with consumers paying a premium for foreign brandnames following contamination of the locally - produced Sanlu brand with melamine in 2008.

Nestlé now promotes follow - on formulas for use past one year of age with exactly the same branding as the infant formula.

Following Nestlé's entry into the UK and Irish formula markets in December 2012, when it finalised its takeover of Pfizer Nutrition / Wyeth and the SMA brand, we are starting to see more aggressive baby milk marketing practices, both from Nestlé and its main competitor, Danone.

It looks like this will be one of the last with this branding as in the new competitive environment following Nestlé entry into the market, it is being rebranded to directly promote Aptamil and Cow & Gate formulas.

packaging, branding and labelling may induce mothers to use follow - up formula in the first six months of life and / or to stop breastfeeding after this period.

Nestlé exacerbates the cross-promotional impact of its advertising as its labels do not comply with the labelling requirements, which state: «the specific terms «infant formula» and «follow - on formula» should be clearly featured on the packaging, in a font size no smaller than the brand name.»

As reported in a number of studies,12 - 14 while follow - up formula may not be explicitly promoted as a breast - milk substitute, documented marketing strategies, such as packaging, branding and labelling may induce mothers to use follow - up formula in the first six months of life and / or to stop breastfeeding after this period.

Foreign milk powder brands and imported formula command a premium in China, following numerous safety scandals involving Chinese infant formula including the deliberate contamination of baby powder in 2008 with melamine that killed at least six babies and sickened 300,000.

The first time that I washed Norton's cloth diapers with the Funk Rock Ammonia Bouncer and followed up with Rockin Green detergent (Hard Rock formula), the diapers came out of the washing machine smelling absolutely brand new fresh and divine.

Pfizer / Wyeth has another ruling against it today from the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) following a complaint brought by Baby Milk Action, this time against an email campaign for its SMA brand of formula.

Follow - on formula (marketed for use from 6 months of age) and milks for older babies can be advertised and promoted — BUT this must not cross-promote infant formula through similar branding or by it not being obvious the product is for older babies.

We also demonstrated to the Commission that the current regulations fail to stop cross promotion of infant formula brands through other products, so the language in the Delegated Acts was toughened up to make it even clearer that infant formula branding and package text, images and colours should be clearly distinct from those used on follow - on formula.

The «follow - on» formula text on the pack shot is 20 % the size of the brand name and so can not said to be «clear».

Nestlé has entered the UK market following its takeover of Pfizer Nutrition / Wyeth and the SMA formula brand.

Mike Manley, Head of the Jeep Brand for FCA Global, said, «Our Cherokee and Renegade Trailhawk models are among our fastest selling and most sought - after models, and we are following that successful formula to provide consumers even more legendary Jeep 4x4 capability for Grand Cherokee — the most awarded SUV ever.»

We recommend that one of the following diets be fed: Mazuri (Purina Mills) Ferret formula, Totally Ferret, Bandit Brand (Marshall Farms) Ferret food, Sheppard and Green ferret food, Science Diet Kitten formula, or Iams Kitten formula.

This company similar to the other top dog food brands I've mentioned above follows a very simplistic formula to manufacture pet food with high quality protein sources, no additives or unnecessary carbohydrate fillings, with an addition of vital vitamins and minerals.