The ozone losses predicted in the study are much larger than losses estimated in previous «nuclear winter» and «ultraviolet spring» scenario calculations
following nuclear conflicts -LSB-...] A 1985 National Research Council Report predicted a global nuclear exchange involving thousands of megatons of explosions, rather than the 1.5 megatons assumed in the PNAS study, would deplete only 17 percent of the Northern Hemisphere's stratospheric ozone, which would recover by half in three years.
Not exact matches
At the same time growing tensions between Israel and Iran
following Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's revelations about Iran's alleged clandestine
nuclear program have ramped up concerns about a potential
conflict.
Because that would be a conventional military
conflict with Russia, which is feared to escalate into a limited
nuclear conflict followed by a total
nuclear conflict.
Dan [ANDY REVKIN comments: These are very important points, as anyone would recognize who's
followed windmill fights, the
nuclear debate, or Canada's
conflicts with native communities over new «clean» hydro projects.
«The big surprise is that this study demonstrates that a small - scale, regional
nuclear conflict is capable of triggering ozone losses even larger than losses that were predicted
following a full - scale
nuclear war.»