The Decision Tree Model shows
the following predictor variables in infant's development: 1) the duration of an infant's hospitalization in ICU, 2) mother's employment 3) amount of physical contact with infant after childbirth and 4) father's level of involvement in parenting.
Not exact matches
It concluded that negative intermeeting stock market returns are a stronger
predictor of subsequent target changes in the Fed funds rate than any commonly
followed macroeconomic
variable.
Several analyses focused on missing data.36 To explore missing data patterns, we coded loss to
follow - up as a binary
variable and tested baseline
variables as
predictors using a stepwise logistic regression.
Pre-later and
follow - up are examples of cross-level interactions, 37 wherein the level 2
variable, condition, affects the slope of a level 1
predictor.
We calculated χ2 statistics, t tests, and correlation coefficients to analyze the bivariate associations between each potential
predictor variable (anthropometric and psychosocial family characteristics) and the 2 criteria of long - term weight change: success versus failure in weight reduction up to the 12 - month
follow - up and weight change between the conclusion of treatment and the 12 - month
follow - up.
Bivariate Associations Between
Predictor Variables and Success Versus Failure in Weight Reduction up to 12 - Month
Follow - up
Multiple regression analyses showing
predictor variables at entry to trial (immunological, psychological, and demographic) and investigator rated Karnofsky performance index scores * at
follow up
The relations between independent
predictor variables (measures of immunological and psychological function at entry to the trial, age of onset, and duration of illness) and dependent dichotomous outcome
variables (self rated global outcome; presence or absence of caseness on the general health questionnaire at
follow up; reduced or normal delayed responses to hypersensitivity skin test) were examined in separate logistic regression analyses.
Across all of the significant
predictors, however, families and children displaying fewer problems on the
predictor variables at pretreatment had fewer problems at posttreatment and
follow - up.
We
followed Kraemer et al. (2002) in describing a
predictor as a
variable that is present at the time intervention started and is associated with a response to treatment, but that does not show a differential response to type of treatment.
The guidelines by Baron and Kenny (1986) were
followed, and, in line with Aiken and West (1991), the continuous
predictor variables were centered prior to the two - way interaction analysis.
The
following criteria are necessary for mediation: (I) the
predictor (family functioning) should be significantly associated with the outcome (HbA1c), (II) the
predictor should be significantly associated with the mediator (adherence), (III) the mediator should be associated with the outcome
variable (with the
predictor accounted for), and (IV) lastly, the addition of the mediator to the full model should reduce the relation between the
predictor and criterion
variable.
To determine which risk and resistance
variables independently predicted metabolic control, we entered the statistical control
variables followed by self - care behavior and the three significant psychosocial
predictors (friend support, drive for thinness by sex, and parent relationship by sex) into a single model to predict metabolic control.
Due to the non-significant associations between child internalizing problems and the parent co-regulation
variables, the
following hierarchical regression analysis focused on
predictors of child externalizing problems.
We entered the significant
predictor variable into the equation
followed by self - care behavior and the self - care behavior by age interaction.