You don't have to go for sugars if you are
following the equation above.
Not exact matches
Finally, by substituting the historic linear trend
above into the IRR term of this
equation, and the industry average investment period of 13 years into the c term, we get the
following formula, which shows that nominal R&D productivity / ROI currently stands at about 1.2 (i.e., we get only 20 % back on top of our original R&D investment after 13 years), is declining exponentially by about 10 % per year, and will hit 1.0 (zero net return on investment) by 2020:
The reasoning outlined
above follows the same logic regardless of which bureau supplies the underlying report and
equation result.
The
following equation shows a strong linear relationship obtained from the least squares fit of the parameters discussed
above.
As I wrote at 2/20 6:07 am
above the 1996 paper has been
followed up, verified and published more recently by several other independent atmospheric thermodynamic physicist authors proving Fig. 1 in the top post thought experiment to be non-isothermal, isentropic at equilibrium (they do include for Willis» sake
equations with = signs).
The heat into the top layer
follows the normal
equations, as shown in the notebook
above.
Classical tracks like John Adams» «The Chairman Dances»
follow the
above trends even more drastically — the lower register strings and percussion lack the depth and roundness that a more substantial bass presence would bring to the
equation.