Sentences with phrase «following the theory of»

I follow theories of Cesar Millan and by far they're the best.

It follows the theory of the Fermi Paradox of why humans might be alone in the Universe.

Always useful to have a new theory on hand that explains why the Earth is decidedly not following the theory of global warming.

Most states follow the theory of «comparative negligence,» which means that if the injured party is determined to have been responsible for a certain percentage of the harm, that party's recovery (the monetary «damages» awarded or reached by settlement) will be reduced by that same percentage.

This is because California law is designed to follow the theory of comparative fault.

The above case focuses on the intervening cause law in another state, but New Mexico also follows the theory of independent causes when apportioning liability in personal injury cases.

You don't necessarily have to follow theories of design to find a successful scheme

Not exact matches

But the theory — of a device that both follows players and, just maybe, revitalizes face - to - face engagement in this era of «alone together» — seems laid on solid footing so far.

In theory, Occupy was a protest against economic inequality, a reaction not just to the gap between «the 1 %» and «the 99 %,» but to the widening of that gap in the years following the financial crisis of 2008 and 2009.

The Art Science of Negotiation, a scholarly work by Harvard Business School professor Howard Raiffa that applied game - and decision - theory ideas to business, came out the following year.

Meanwhile on the TV side, the site TorrentFreak found that for the third year running, HBO's Game of Thrones is the most pirated program of 2014 with more than 8 million downloads from BitTorrent, followed by AMC's The Walking Dead (4.2 million), and CBS's The Big Bang Theory (3.6 million), the consistently most watched cable drama and network comedy.

However, there is some evidence to support the theory that the initial impetus that results from inclusion is often followed by a period of stock - price declines.

Its research activities seek to develop actionable, prescriptive theory that can guide general managers in the decisions they must make, re-invigorating general management research by following a proven research process, refining it through collaboration with practitioners, and then distributing it to a broad audience In pursuit of these goals, the Forum both hosts conferences to bring together academic experts, leading practitioners, and Harvard Business School alumni to develop current ideas and engages in extensive publishing activities.

His theory has been distilled by others and spread widely to the public as something akin to the following: An investment portfolio should be a balance between publicly - traded stocks and bonds, starting with a ratio of 70:30, transitioning away from stocks and into bonds as the investor gets older.

As part of our continuing series of commentaries celebrating the 50th anniversary of Mel Watkins» classic article, «A Staple Theory of Economic Growth,» we present the following commentary by Marc Lee, economist with the B.C. office of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. Marc considers the implications — both economic and environmental — of the current -LSB-...]

Richard Russell of Dow Theory Letters and Ike Iossif of Aegean Capital have also noted the same pattern in various measures they follow independently.

For those who have asked about other analysts who follow a «no forecasting required» approach, the only other analyst I know that completely grounds himself in the present is Richard Russell of Dow Theory Letters (he also has a Fu - Manchu mustache, which makes him appear appropriately Zen - like).

Financial industry norms and academic theories — even popular beliefs — have always assumed assets saved for retirement would be systematically withdrawn — following the «4 % rule» or some other rule of thumb or system — by retirees in order to maintain a consistent standard of living.

«Till this day, the vast majority of individual investors and institutional investors still follow investment philosophies that are based on «bad theories.»

A large part of the Dollar's strength (beyond «just» the data) post - the election has been based upon this, where if the corporate tax rate were cut to say 20 %, the Dollar would by economic theory have to then appreciate 20 % (and of course too, an additional «tax factor» driving the USD bull - thesis is that a meaningful chunk of $ 2.5 T of profits held overseas by US corporates would be repatriated following a «business friendly» incentive package / one - time cut to the repatriation tax to say 8 - 10 %).

Then follow the tips sprinkled throughout the text for help in implementing the theory in making the most out of the linkable assets you already have and in seeking out ways to create more linkable content.

Mark Whitmore: This is Mark Whitmore, I keep forgetting we have two Mark's on the line here, and Chris you absolutely interpreted what I was trying to say correctly, and kind of to follow up a little bit, I think one of the things that the other Mark pointed out is the issue of timing, and whereas the two prevailing investing paradigms out there seem to be this notion of efficient market theory which attempts to just buy and hold the market no matter what, completely price indifferent.

For those of you who blindly follow Evolutionary Theory, you are the ones who should show a little intelligence and try researching Scientific Creationism, which is much more credible.

While most leaders or aspiring leaders would agree with this in theory, many life - long Christians, especially those with ministry responsibilities, spend more time pursing a deeper understanding of leadership principles than they do learning to hear God and submitting themselves to following.

Then it should follow that Theology... the study of thought and religions is just a theory hence «all religion» is just a theory.

Please, any Christian, honestly answer the following: The completely absurd theory that all 7,000,000,000 human beings are simultaneously being supervised 24 hours a day, every day of their lives by an immortal, invisible being for the purposes of reward or punishment in the «afterlife» comes from the field of: (a) Astronomy; (b) Medicine; (c) Economics; or (d) Christianity You are about 70 % likely to believe the entire Universe began less than 10,000 years ago with only one man, one woman and a talking snake if you are a: (a) historian; (b) geologist; (c) NASA astronomer; or (d) Christian I have convinced myself that gay $ ex is a choice and not genetic, but then have no explanation as to why only gay people have ho.mo $ exual urges.

What follows is in effect a history of theories of suffering, beginning with the ancient world.

He has shown a lack of reasoning in this regard, following along the lines that accepting creation means that basically a person is «stupid» and that educated people believe in this theory.

The basis of the theory of evolution is as follows: if all of the materials to form a protein (the most basic component of DNA) are present in the environment, they will bond together to form a protein.

In fact it is remarkable that this theory has had progressively greater influence on the spirit of researchers, following a series of discoveries in different scholarly disciplines.

Newton's law of gravity was later explained, in turn, by Einstein, who showed that it followed from a more profound theory of gravity called general relativity.

David, I've followed your unfolding of the Z theory with interest.

Each text will be introduced in turn with a brief explanation of how God is portrayed in the passage, and this will be followed with a brief explanation of how to understand God's actions in light of the Chaos Theory and in light of God taking on the sin of the whole world, just as Jesus did on the cross.

When one puts the theory to the task of developing an account of divine experience, it therefore follows quite directly that temporal ordering and structure will be judged to be as essential to the divine experience as to any other.

Thus, instead of pointing out that no ideology or world view automatically follows from scientific data and theory, but represents a leap to another level of discourse, the creationists invite scientists to draw the very conclusions that creationists claim to deplore.

The problem, however, is that instead of forcefully challenging all these conclusions — which do not directly and necessarily follow from science or from evolutionary theory — the scientific creationists encourage them.

- how you can claim it's unfair to characterize evangelicals as anti-intellectual while following a man who believes conspiracy theories from the National Enquirer, thinks climate change is a hoax, says vaccines cause autism, and displays such breathtaking ignorance regarding the state of the world and foreign policy that no former presidents will endorse him and multiple generals, foreign policy experts, editorial boards, and heads of state have denounced him as dangerously uninformed,

I did not say that «Hitler was an atheist», I said that his regime followed «science, reason, the theory of evolution, and EUGENICS».

Scientists today are still following his intuition as they seek the grand unifying principle that will unify quantum theory with the theory of relativity to give one overarching explanation of the nature of the universe.

I have a theory that SBNRs are so because one or more or a combination of the following: (1) they can't justify their spiritual texts - and so they try to remove themselves from gory genocidal tales, misogyny and anecdotal professions of a man / god, (2) can't defend and are turned off by organized religious history (which encompasses the overwhelming majority of spiritual experiences)- which is simply rife with cruelty, criminal behavior and even modern day cruel - ignorant ostracization, (3) are unable to separate ethics from their respective religious moral code - they, like many theists on this board, wouldn't know how to think ethically because they think the genesis of morality resides in their respective spiritual guides / traditions and (4) are unable to separate from the communal (social) benefits of their respective religion (many atheists aren't either).

I don't think you meant what you said in the following statement: «And Not like most of us... Mr. Hawking has not put forth a «proven» Final Theory or the Theory of Everything...»

If you've followed my z - theory at all, you will understand that I see the story of the incarnation as a powerful metaphor that attempts to describe reality.

Accordingly, the remainder of this essay will proceed as follows: I will first seek to show that the meta - ethical character of every claim to moral validity includes a principle of social action by which a universal community of rights is constituted, so that no moral theory can be valid if it is inconsistent with these rights.

Whatever theologians and philosophers have dreamt of in their theories, Christian artists have typically followed John's lead in portraying a cruciform beauty.

If you've followed my z - theory at all, you will understand that I see the story of the incarnation as a powerful metaphor that attempts to...

The theory of early Berger and those who followed him is similar in important ways to current ideas associated with «postmodernism.»

Kuyper absorbs the cross into a preconceived theory of beauty, and in this he follows a long tradition where Christian writers who adopt and adapt the «Great Theory» that dominated Western aesthetics from the Gtheory of beauty, and in this he follows a long tradition where Christian writers who adopt and adapt the «Great Theory» that dominated Western aesthetics from the GTheory» that dominated Western aesthetics from the Greeks.

An «open letter» from Joel Edwards, general director of the Evangelical Alliance (UK) to those debating the theory of the atonement following the furore... More

I offer the following link from the National Academy of Sciences explaining why evolution is both a theory and a fact.

If you think this mentality would be good for society understand this, Hitler was very fond of this idea and he use to follow the philosopher who came up with that theory.