Arizona
follows pure comparative negligence.
California also
follows the pure comparative negligence law, which allocates fault between the parties, reducing recovery accordingly.
California
follows pure comparative negligence rules, which means that recovery will be limited if you were partially responsible for the accident that caused your injury.
Thirteen states currently
follow the pure comparative negligence system, in which a percentage of fault is assigned to each party and then damages are split accordingly.
Not exact matches
The state
follows the rule of
pure comparative negligence, which simply means that the amount of compensation you can get will be reduced by your own degree of fault.
Rather than contributory
negligence, most states
follow either a
pure comparative fault, or a modified
comparative fault law (Pennsylvania
follows the latter).
Washington
follows what's known as
pure comparative negligence.
Florida
follows a «
pure»
comparative negligence rule, which means that a plaintiff's damages award will be reduced in proportion to the percentage of fault attributable to the plaintiff.
In California, the rules of
pure comparative negligence are
followed.
New Mexico
follows the rule of
pure comparative negligence.
In New Mexico, courts
follow the doctrine of
pure comparative negligence.