Sentences with phrase «follows questions over»

The decision follows questions over the lethal injection cocktail to be used in the execution of Scott Raymond Dozier.

Attitude & Motivation Coaching Communication Daily Life Emotional Intelligence Management People Skills Professionalism Troubleshooting We received the following question over at the Fast Track blog: One of my employees is great at her job.

Not exact matches

Over the following weeks, Trump said he didn't respect Megyn Kelly, called her a «bimbo,» and said that her show had gone downhill and she didn't know how to ask tough questions.

So I'll go into some of the details of the vehicle design and performance, and I'm gonna gloss over — I'll only talk a little bit about that the technical details in the actual presentation, and then I'll leave the detailed technical questions to the Q&A that follows.

Don would probably then go on to ask the following questions: Why should someone notice your business over all the others?

The Journal says the subpoenas come as New York plans to issue a memo raising questions over whether Bitcoin companies are following state law.

The announcement of the changes raised a lot of concerns among sellers at the event and online, with over a thousand questions pouring in following the announcements.

On social media, make a video or post asking everyone who follows you the very question we have been repeating over and over: «What are my personal strengths?»

Personally, the media circus that followed Marissa Meyer's announcement reminds me of a friend who used to descend into a state of melancholy over this question: Can any of us really ever be a «good mother»?

José Alberto Cabranes, who later went on to become the first Puerto Rican to be appointed to a federal judgeship, published an exhaustive review of the legislative deliberations over the question of Puerto Rico's political fate following America's annexation of the island.

The 73 - year - old Sorrell, who built the group from a two - man outfit in 1985 to dominate the industry, remains a hard act to follow however and Chairman Quarta faced questions over his handling of the April 14 departure from analysts.

I have over 804 emails in my inbox marked for follow - up right now, including many questions from people asking for advice.

He declined to answer several follow - up questions, including whether Mr. Trump had been aware that Mr. Cohen made the payment, why he made the payment or whether he had made similar payments to other people over the years.

But lawmakers» questions were all over the place, as many tried to get in a moment for their favorite issues, and even illuminating queries sometimes didn't get much follow - up.

I have no question that these conditions will emerge over the completion of the current market cycle, and - despite the truncated bullish shift and awkward transition that followed my 2009 stress - testing decision - there is not a single market cycle in 30 years as a professional investor where those same conditions did not provoke me to adopt a constructive outlook.

The two aides to the embattled Environmental Protection Agency chief left their posts this week, following two congressional hearings last week where Pruitt was questioned over his ethics scandals and deregulatory agenda.

Following Warren Buffet comments, analysts have again started raising questions over the digital currencies potential to work as the medium of exchange.

We have used available data to address the following question: has the prevalence of traditional metrics (relative TSR and EPS) used in S&P / ASX 200 long - term incentive plans changed over time?

«We are seeing a moderation over the last year in both the buildup of household indebtedness and also the related imbalances in the housing market,» Bank of Canada Deputy Governor Timothy Lane said in response to an audience question following a speech in Toronto.

But if your intent as an investor is to seek solid returns over the long term in order to pay future college expenses or fund a comfortable retirement, you need to ask yourself the following questions:

Following the statement, there will be a Q & A session in which the ECB president will answer questions posed by members of the press from all over the world.

The answer to this question may be revealed over the course of this year, if the Fed follows through with two more rate hikes.

Several weeks back there was a bit of a dust - up in conservative Reformed Protestant circles over the following simple question: Does being a man or a woman have any ethical significance for the way we live together in civil society?

The document criticizes «doctrinal or disciplinary security,» «an obsession with the law,» «punctilious concern for... doctrine,» «dogmatism,» «hiding behind rules and regulations,» and «a rigid resistance to change,» while reprimanding those who «give excessive importance to certain rules,» overemphasize «ecclesial rules,» believe that «doctrine... is a closed system,» «feel superior to others because they observe certain rules,» have «an answer for every question,» wish to «exercise a strict supervision over others» lives,» «long for a monolithic body of doctrine guarded by all and leaving no room for nuance,» believe that «we give glory to God... simply by following certain ethical norms,» and «look down on others like heartless judges, lording it over them and always trying to teach them lessons.»

My question - why do people CHOOSE to follow a deity who holds that over people's heads, but refuses to give any real proof, or take any real action.

A second question might be the following: Will the new group of reconciled persons in each place be a kind of «skin graft» growing over old divisions, or will it be simply an interim, experimental organization for developing and enhancing new relationships among still separated bodies?

Taking the first fledgling onto her wing, the mother bird began to carry him across, and while over the middle of the river she asked him the following question: «My dear son, when I am old and too feeble to fly far, will you carry me across?»

David had to answer a question that millions of followers of Jesus have asked themselves over the centuries: «Can I go on following a God who allows me to go through things?»

I have asked the following six questions to various Bible study groups and discipleship classes over the years.

That Paul was a violent persecutor of early Christians, and came into theological conflict with Peter and James at Antioch over the larger question of allowing Gentiles to be believers without following Mosaic Law is unquestioned.

These are among the questions researchers and I tried to answer by surveying over 2,000 working Ameri cans and conducting in - depth interviews with more than 175 of them (some of these respondents are cited by name in the remarks that follow).

RESOURCES Bloomberg, Obama Lead Over Romney Similar to 2008 Margin Over McCain Life of Julia DNC Video: «The Government Is The Only Thing We All Belong To» Berkley Center, Contraception and Conscience: A Symposium on Religious Liberty, Women's Health, and the HHS Rule on Provision of Birth Control Coverage for Employees (See, for example, the question posed during Panel 3, at 1:25:40) The American Catholic, 98 % of Catholic Women Use Birth Control Become a fan of First Things on Facebook, subscribe to First Things via RSS, and follow First Things on Twitter.

It would follow that Jews have far more to fear from a rationalized Christianity than from one in conflict with Judaism over the question of Christianity's Jewishness.

On this question, D'Souza follows an argument that has been made very effectively by Thomas Sowell over the years.

Following the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission's (ACCC) comments over a potential lack of competition should Saputo's purchase of Murray Goulburn go ahead, the Canadian company has said it will sell the plant in question so its takeover...

Although question marks have always been raised over his defensive quality and concentration, the Brazilian international was a key figure in Chelsea's Premier League title success last season after returning to west London following his stint at PSG.

Question: What do the following preferences have in common: Whitey Ford over Nolan Ryan, Joe DiMaggio over Cal Ripken, Mickey Rivers over Mark Fidrych, Phil Simms over Bob Waterfield, and Freeman McNeil over Franco Harris?

Now I know many will have superstar players ready to ink in on the team sheet over the names of Giroud and Coquelin but I would like to pose the following question.

There were question marks and doubts over Costa's ability to succeed at Chelsea following a stellar season for Atletico due to his susceptibility to injuries and his relatively paltry record before 2013/14 but he has proven himself to be every bit of the centre forward Chelsea were crying out for all of last season.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Question marks still remain over Hazard's future; a return to form in the following month would do wonders for Chelsea, Hazard's future and Belgium's World Cup hopes.

As we now know, things didn't work out that way, but for the months that followed many questions have been raised over who got the better deal.

On this occasion, the 54 - year - old was responding to questions over his future following a report from the Daily Mail that the club feared he could quit at the end of the season.

Out of all the strikers linked to us I would rank their desirability / fit / potential as follows: 1) Lacavette mainly for potential but and squad fit 2) Martinez, slight unknown, bit of a risk but he will have decent motivation imo 3) Higuain — better goal returns over a long period than Benzema 4) Benzema — decent but question his attitude, desire.

Another reporter followed by asking Brady, «Do you kind of relish that knowing that you can take all those questions on, you can deflect away from the pressure of your teammates, because you've been dealing with questions like that in various ways over the last 15, 16 years?»

The third thing that will affect his decision of when and where he will strengthen will be; Long term injuries — At the moment we only have Danny Welbeck who has a question mark over his fitness following his injury at the back end of last season but knowing Arsenal there will be more.

The German international's future at the Allianz Arena has been questioned in the last few days following comments from his agent Volker Struth over the weekend, where he claimed Bayern boss Pep Guardiola had «destroyed» the attacking midfielder [via Mail Sport].

Manchester United assistant manager Ryan Giggs has expressed his admiration for his boss Louis van Gaal, despite questions being raised over their relationship following their dramatic win at Newcastle on Wednesday, reports the Daily Star.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

The future of Papiss Cisse at Newcastle is in question after the striker was forced to train on his own following a dispute with the club over their shirt sponsors.