The word implies that there is a direct connection between a certain act and what
follows said act.
Not exact matches
Under the Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets
Act, which many states have adopted, «digital assets
follow according to the will, but they have to be mentioned in the will,» Florian
said.
Welch wanted Immelt to also have 20 years at the helm to put his stamp on the company, Langone
said, but stressed that Welch, who stepped down in 2001, was a hard
act to
follow.
Her allegation was
followed by accusations by other women who
said Velasquez
acted inappropriately toward them.
If Trump
follows through with campaign promises to take a tougher line on global trade, that could
act as a brake on U.S. growth,
said O'Neil.
It was
saying virtual currency must
follow things like the Bank Secrecy
Act, or register with FinCen.
Following release of the final memorandum on Friday,
acting Labor Secretary Ed Hugler, in a statement,
said, «The Department of Labor will now consider its legal options to delay the applicability date as we comply with the president's memorandum.»
So if if people all refuse to honor to see
say we to
act as an equity Bitcoin and continue to use and give the old the current Bitcoin value in the market then the hash would
follow that right.
The nationwide analysis, released Thursday by California's insurance exchange,
said repeal of the Affordable Care
Act's «individual mandate» to hold insurance is the main driver, jacking up rates by 7 percent to 15 percent in 2019 and up to 10 percent in the
following two years, as younger and / or healthier people decide not to get coverage.
CALGARY — A Saskatchewan mayor whose city's water supply was interrupted for several weeks
following a Husky Energy Inc. oil pipeline leak in July 2016
says he hopes environmental charges announced Monday
act as a deterrent for other pipeline firms.
Lew
said that while the Obama administration has failed in its efforts to get tax reform through Congress, he believes the unhappiness expressed by both Democrats and Republicans
following Europe's announcement on Tuesday could push Congress to
act.
After Fannie Mae announced today that its fourth quarter earnings plummeted by two - thirds and CEO Tim Mayopoulos
said that a lack of a capital cushion could trigger a future draw from the U.S. Treasury, NAHB Chairman Tom Woods issued the
following statement calling on Congress to swiftly
act on comprehensive housing finance reform:
Russia's central banker Alexei Ulyukayev
said that Japan is
acting to weaken its currency and there is a danger that others will
follow suit and foster a round of destabilising devaluations:
«That's why today's announcement by Facebook is so important, and I would encourage all of the platform companies to
follow suit as we work toward making the Honest Ads
Act the law of the land, ensuring that political ads sold online abide by the same disclosure rules as TV and radio ads,» Warner
said in a statement Friday.
If someone
acts as if they have the final
say about you «getting to heaven,» remember first that «getting to heaven» isn't even the point of Christian faith, and second, that anybody using a carrot on a stick to manipulate your behaviors doesn't
follow the God who gives grace with crazy generosity.
As N. T. Wright
says, this «love will grit its teeth and
act as if the emotions were in place, trusting they will
follow in good time.»
We certainly can not
say that every time a man
acts without thinking, that every time he
follows his instinct, he executes a divine judgment.
Holloway
follows the traditional notion of the «remedy for concupiscence»,
saying that it is permitted to seek sex «for the tempering of disordered natural desire», [7] «in remedium concupiscentiae», as long as this is done in such a way as not to thwart the primary end of the
act.
I thought straight away this is a joke as scriptures tell us only the father knows the time of his sons return and hes keeping it to himself he hasnt even told his son yet.Mark 13:32 This a mystery isnt God all knowing and isnt Jesus God it is a mystery.Yet I like that that is the case because it proves that the father is not the son and the son is not the father they are separate yet they are one just like the holy spirit.I have come across denominations that believe the father son and holy spirit are the one person i asked them how they can
say that when Jesus was baptized we see 3 separate persons.We have enough information to know that we are in the last days the signs are present and increasing.Ever since Israel became a nation the countdown has begun.The verse the enemy will come like a thief in the night i have heard preached many times and i believe the preachers have got it wrong because they preach it from the view for the church to get there
act together or you will miss out.This view is incorrect because if you are a born again believer
following him in obedience and relying on the holy spirit you are not walking in darkness but are walking in the light so you will not be caught unaware as those who are sleeping this is a warning for those who are sleeping or walking according to the flesh they are in darkness.Remember the 10 wise virgins the ones who were alert and keep refilling there lamps went in with the bride those who slept were left behind and so it will be when the Lord returns.Now is the time to prepare our hearts and lives to be ready for his return.It is an exciting time to be living and we are to live in the expectation that the Lord could return at any time brentnz
It
follows that a putative moral prescription is meta - ethically senseless and thus can not be valid if the individuals to whom it is
said to apply can not
act as it requires and do so because the prescription is valid.
That
said, I don't believe that Terry Jone is
acting like he does because he rationally
follows Biblical principles.
That horrible person WAS NOT a Christian... # 1 way to tell if a person is a Christian... IS THAT WHAT JESUS CHRIST WOULD HAVE DONE?????? The answer to that question is «HECK NO»!!!!!!! If you want to know what a true Christian is then look to the person we
follow... those of us who are
following in his footsteps and doing what he
said to do «Love your neighbor» (that includes all neighbors even if they don't look,
act, or think like you).
Christians that
say they want to
act in violance for Christ are not true Christians, but those that want to
follow Jesus in love and peace are.
If people actually
followed the bible and didn't hanged carved images of worship up this wouldn't even be an issue what the bible
say you shall not have any Gods before me Claiming that a picture of Jesus is actually a picture of him and thinking it protects you or keeps you safe is an
act of worship.
We can not here embark on the doctrine of God, but I would wish to affirm both God's transcendence in one aspect of his being and his temporality in another aspect, and to
say that God does
act within our temporal history, and that the response of faith itself a part of history, affecting what
follows — is a response to the ontological reality to which it points in
saying God has
acted.1 I affirm that God so
acted within the wider event «Jesus Christ,» and in particular in his resurrection.
Follow the way by which they began (emphasis added); by
acting as if they believed, taking the holy water, having masses
said, etc..»
To the two questions that
follow the first one I would
say that, yes, under this dispensation, in this
act of the divine drama of redemption, innocence until proven guilty is an important value, but it should not be construed as the absolute, universally valid ethic to be used as a lens for looking at specific, singular events in the biblically recorded past.
Follow the way by which they began; by
acting as if they believed, taking the holy water, having masses
said, etc..
I have the choice to believe,
follow,
act,
say whatever I want.
1 Corinthians 3:4 - 11 When one of you
says, «I am a follower of Paul,» and another
says, «I
follow Apollos,» aren't you
acting just like people of the world?
So when I saw the faces once again of so many with whom thirty years before and in the decades that
followed I had - so often bitterly embattled against the Establishment - faced that challenge, men from whom inevitably I had become separated on my own conversion to Rome; and when I saw their profound happiness at the Pope's great and apostolic
act, and their excitement at the prospect before them, I could not fail to remember once more a famous passage from the Apologia pro Vita Sua, which the agnostic George Eliot
said she could not read without tears; and certainly, I can not:
I'm not sure to
say that we do absolutely «nothing,» which is the feeling I get from your article, doesn't make sense to me when we are commanded to «believe,» something that we must do; God grants grace and once we allow it's reception, we must
follow - through and
act.
In general, we may
say that these implications include everything that
follows for human action — both how we are to
act and what we are to do — from a love for God and for all others in God that is unbounded in the two respects just noted, and so covers both the full range of creaturely interests and the full scope of human responsibility.
It's the one that Jesus referred to when he
said your enemies would come from your own family (Matt 10:21,22)... maybe because they refuse to
follow the crowd?!! (
acts 28:22) As these religions all consider the Trinity central to their beliefs; consider: 1) God loved the world so much he gave «his only begotten son»!!
An Arabian Proverb states that «The worst of all disasters is the One that makes laugh... admit many might have laughed out first out of disbelieve that such kids is
said to have pulled such unbelievable
act to such A Country with such tight Security... then again have laughed in disbelieve of what might happen as a reaction for that pulled
act which serves no Arabian nor a Muslim country but rather it served those who want certain accounts or references to burn down or to shake the trade for certain immediate gains or for gains that might result out of the reaction that will
follow...
So grow up and
act responsibly, either
follow what the Vatican
says or leave the Catholic Church — you can still be a good Christians, just not a Catholic.
Thus, we are told that even if the particular consequences likely to
follow from our
act (let us
say, breaking a promise) are consequences that we disinterestedly prefer, we must consider also what the consequences would be if everyone broke promises whenever they judged the consequences preferable.
It's the one that Jesus referred to when he
said your enemies would come from your own family (Matt 10:21,22)... maybe because they refuse to
follow the crowd?!! (
acts 28:22) As these religions all consider the Trinity central to their beliefs; consider: 1) if Jesus is God, who is he meant to be with in John 1:1?
When we
say that faith alone, the faith which is aware of the divine encounter, can speak of God, and that therefore when the believer speaks of an
act of God he is ipso facto speaking of himself as well, it by no means
follows that God has no real existence apart from the believer or the
act of believing.
It had Joseph lying next to Mary in bed and looking glum, and underneath it
said, «God is a hard
act to
follow».
god is the same yesterday today and forever,
act is catholic dogma i thought Protestants don't
follow catholic dogma, Jesus never
said you could eat pork he
said go ans sin no more sin is braking the law of god,..
The
ACT is set to
follow New South Wales» lead and ban greyhound racing after Chief Minister Andrew Barr
said there was «no future for the industry» in the territory.
This game contained, in brute list form: a remarkable opening goal from David Beckham (that has been almost completely forgotten by history, which
says a lot about what was to
follow); a spawny equaliser; Roy Keane and Patrick Vieira; a (correctly) disallowed Nicolas Anelka goal that was (wonderfully) celebrated for fully a minute and a half; Jaap Stam and Tony Adams; a (deserved) red card that involved the referee actively pursuing Keane, the better to take (onanistic) pleasure in the
act of dismissal; extra-time; Arsenal pressure; a (hopelessly abject) foul from Phil Neville to concede a penalty; a surprisingly tepid missed penalty from Dennis Bergkamp; Peter Schmeichel saving; Peter Schmeichel barking; an unusually sleepy pass from Vieira; and then, that run, that finish, that goal, that winner, that completely stupid slalom through a stupified defence.
Knox left himself with a tough
act to
follow but he
says, «What we did a year ago is a thing of the past.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being
said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to
act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would
say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because
following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
As much credit as Harbaugh has gotten for his heroic
act, the Michigan football coach
said he was just
following Colonel Minick's lead the whole way.
KEY FACT: Burnley are unbeaten in their three home Premier League matches against Stoke MATCH ODDS: Burnley 13/10 Draw 11/5 Stoke 13/5 bet365 Pick: Both Teams To Score @Evens ANDY
SAYS: Tough game this, but Burnley at home on a winter's night, have to go with them... 2 - 1 GRAEME
SAYS: I think Stoke have been poor recently so have to go Burnley... 2 - 0 SILKY
SAYS: Have to think Burnley will just about have too much for Stoke here... 2 - 1 FOOTBALLIndex — One to
follow: Xherdan Shaqiri is still a class
act but not only jut over 70p
Having
said that, hearing of Bolton's run without drawing a Premier League game, which now stands at 22
following their reverse at West Brom, will surely
act as a deterrent for most?
Janet Gonzalez - Mena, early childhood educator and author, focuses on the
act of putting the child first in your thoughts when she
says, «The moment I decided to
follow instead of lead, I discovered the joys of becoming part of a small child's world.»
On sugar content, she
said the composition laid down in the delegated
act was in line with EFSA's scientific opinion on the essential composition of infant and
follow - on formulae published in 2014.