In theory, there is no reason whatsoever for a conflict between
food and fuel production.
Not exact matches
Resistance is also
fueled by the massive
and often inappropriate use of antibiotics in agriculture; for decades these precious drugs have been used to promote growth
and fend off costly infections that can result from the cramped conditions of industrial - scale
food animal
production.
While protein products developed by these companies are not currently fit for human consumption, methane - based proteins could improve the environmental impact of meat
production,
and eventually further
fuel the meatless revolution by creating another
food source for developing economies in Africa
and Asia.
A report from the Global Harvest Initiative states that the demand for
food, feed, fiber
and fuel will likely outpace
food production in 2050.
But as human population expands
and subsistence farming gives way to mechanized agriculture,
food production has become reliant on fossil
fuel and fertilizers to increase yield from rapidly shrinking farmland.
Growing awareness of organic
production methods
and rising disposable incomes are
fuelling demand for organic & sustainable
foods.
Coconut trees in the Philippines have already been on the decline for decades,
and the coconut oil from coconuts is also now valued as a
fuel source in bio-diesel
production, resulting in less coconut oil availability as a
food source each year.
The emergence of climate change
and critical constraints on fossil
fuel and other non-renewable resources as key limiting factors for the expansion or even maintenance of existing large - scale
food production systems in Australia
According to the Mayo Clinic, protein - rich
foods such as lean meat, eggs, dairy, beans, lentils
and seafood low in mercury help
fuel milk
production.
Food production is likely to come under increased pressure in the coming years if
fuel prices continue to rise
and the world's population increases.
At least 70 percent more calories would be available if farmers shifted from growing crops for feed
and fuels to
food production
For more than 50 years fossil
fuels and fertilizers have been the key ingredients in much greater global
food production and distribution.
Food production is rising sharply, requiring more carbon - based
fuels and nitrogen - based fertilizers, both of which exacerbate global warming, river
and ocean pollution,
and a host of other ills.
Schroeder is also co-director of a new research entity at UC San Diego called «
Food and Fuel for the 21st Century,» which is designed to apply basic research on plants to sustainable food and biofuel product
Food and Fuel for the 21st Century,» which is designed to apply basic research on plants to sustainable
food and biofuel product
food and biofuel
production.
Food production accounts for a third of all greenhouse gas emissions when one tallies those from fossil fuels used in growing, preparing and transporting food; the carbon dioxide released by clearing land for farming and pastures; the methane from rice paddies and ruminant livestock; and the nitrous oxide from fertilizer
Food production accounts for a third of all greenhouse gas emissions when one tallies those from fossil
fuels used in growing, preparing
and transporting
food; the carbon dioxide released by clearing land for farming and pastures; the methane from rice paddies and ruminant livestock; and the nitrous oxide from fertilizer
food; the carbon dioxide released by clearing land for farming
and pastures; the methane from rice paddies
and ruminant livestock;
and the nitrous oxide from fertilizer use.
As
fuel prices for imports rise
and more
and more environmental issues linked to
food production come to light, the level of interest in aquaponics is «increasing astronomically,» Rakocy says.
Farmers make the
fuel by chemically treating corn kernels to isolate the sugars
and then feeding the sugars to yeast, which digests them
and secretes ethanol.Not only do the corn husks
and stalks go to waste, but ethanol
production has driven up the price of the corn that is used for
food by reducing its availability.
Competition between
food and fuel crops means that large scale bioethanol
production is therefore controversial.
Unicellular photosynthetic microbes — phytoplankton — are responsible for virtually all oceanic primary
production, which
fuels marine
food webs
and plays a fundamental role in the global carbon cycle.
These
fuels produced from atmospheric CO2 are carbon - neutral
and do not compete with
food production for agricultural crop land.
Those services provide among others the
production of fresh air,
food, feed,
fuel and fibre.
For starters, our country's system for mandating
and subsidizing the
production of ethanol has meant that farmers who could be using their land to grow today's
food feel economically compelled to grow tomorrow's
fuel instead.
Air
and water pollution from fossil
fuel extraction
and use have high costs in human health,
food production,
and natural ecosystems, killing more than 1,000,000 people per year
and affecting the health of billions of people [232], [234], with costs borne by the public.
Fuel your catalase
production by eating
foods like meat which contains sulfur, iron
and methionine.
A better title would have been: «
Fueled: The Effects of Using
Food for Fuel» or something like that, because the central question of the book is to what degree has using crops to produce biomass for fuel production (usually ethanol) affected the costs of food and f
Food for
Fuel» or something like that, because the central question of the book is to what degree has using crops to produce biomass for fuel production (usually ethanol) affected the costs of food and f
Fuel» or something like that, because the central question of the book is to what degree has using crops to produce biomass for
fuel production (usually ethanol) affected the costs of food and f
fuel production (usually ethanol) affected the costs of
food and f
food and fuelfuel.
Anyone who wants a basic understanding of
food economics,
and how that is impacted by a wide number of factors including using crops for the
production of
fuel would benefit from this book.
The context surrounding these deforestation statistics is that Brazil has been promising the world that it can greatly increase its
food,
fuel and energy
production and simultaneously achieve a dramatic reduction in deforestation.
[T] he main actors are parents changing population, workers changing affluence, consumers changing the diet (more or less calories, more or less meat)
and also the portion of crops entering the
food supply (corn can
fuel people or cars),
and farmers changing the crop
production per hectare of cropland (yield).
The more we can centralize our
food production, bringing it closer to our homes,
and the less reliant we are on distant
food suppliers
and fossil
fuel - powered transportation networks, the better off we'll all be.
Human alteration of environments produces multiple effects, some advantageous to societies, such as enhanced
food production,
and some detrimental, like environmental pollution with toxic chemicals, excess nutrients
and carbon emissions from fossil
fuels,
and the loss of wildlife
and their habitats.
In 2007
and 2008, the swift increase in biofuel
production caused a
food crisis that incited political instability
and fueled malnutrition.
The
production of ethanol for
fuel in the US uses huge amounts of land, some of which was brought back into
production for this purpose, large amounts of energy to the point there is probably a net loss, major water consumption,
and little savings in net CO2 emissions (which are plant
food anyway.)
Scheduled increases in the Renewable
Fuel Standard mandating a tripling of U.S. biofuels
production in the next decade would precipitate a massive shift of resources toward biofuels, devastating vast lands, disrupting
food markets
and jacking up CO2 emissions.
They report in Environmental Research Letters that they examined 740 different
production systems for 90 different
foods, to calculate levels of land use, greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), fossil
fuel energy use, the nutrient runoff that leads to eutrophication or «dead zones» in lakes
and rivers,
and the potential for acidification of the waters.
The
production of
food and fibre; the urbanization of once agricultural or forested lands;
and the sequestration of that portion of carbon emissions from fossil
fuels that is not already absorbed by oceans or by long - term sequestration strategies in agriculture or forestry, all constitute competing or non-overlapping uses of ecosystems.
We know that
food production and distribution use tremendous amounts of fossil
fuels.
This will encourage development of sustainable, low - carbon
fuels that avoid conflict with
food production and minimize harmful environmental impacts.
Expanding U.S. biofuel
production will require tradeoffs between ambitious
fuel production targets
and other societal goals, including protection of the water we need for drinking, growing
food, preserving aquatic habitats,
and producing electricity.
Alternative sources of liquid
fuel and liquefiable gas
fuel (elsewhere on this page —
and biodiesel, gasohol, etc.)(In the Third World rainforest is being cleared to plant oil palms for biodiesel
and food production, to the detriment of the global environment.)
However the limit would still expand the use of
food crops for
fuel and would not end biofuels competing with
food production.
From describing the
production of a fiber much more durable
and economic than wood, the documentary discusses hemps multilateral uses as e.g.
food products, as a non-polluting
fuel and as a pharmaceutical product with much less griveous sideeffects than chemical pharmaceutical products.
University of Minnesota: Over the past 50 years, 60 percent of all ecosystem services have declined as a direct result of the conversion of land to the
production of
foods,
fuels and fibers.
The amusing stunt drove home a vital point: Biofuel programs are turning
food into
fuel, converting cropland into
fuel production sites,
and disrupting
food supplies for hungry people worldwide.
The products made from organics are necessities: soil products for the
production of healthy
food, fiber,
and landscapes, as well as
fuel and energy products for transportation, heat,
food preparation,
and electricity.
Another very ugly result of diverting billions of tons of agriculture to
fuel production is the consequence of
food shortages
and skyrocketing
food prices, especially when other sources of
food are interrupted due to natural weather events.
Data from 22 countries shows the result: fewer resources per capita
and a continued risk of famine in areas with low primary
production — that is, the availability of carbon in the form of plant material for consumption as
food,
fuel and feed.
Imagine fossil
fuel companies taking responsibility for their CO2 emissions
and imagine the beef industry taking that CO2
and storing it in the soil, where it enables the
production of more
food, on less land, for less money, using less water.
Re bio
fuel folley, 5 % of the world's crop land has been taken out of
food production when
food needs are growing,
and put into growing
fuel.
Ways to reduce fossil
fuel inputs to
food systems include the use of farm machinery powered by renewable electricity or farm - produced biofuels; the localization of
food systems to reduce transport (perhaps entailing vertical urban agriculture); the adoption of organic
and ecological
production practices to reduce the need for nitrogen fertilizer, pesticides,
and herbicides;
and an overall reduction in the consumption of highly processed
foods.
According to this argument, if U.S. farm
production is used for
fuel instead of
food,
food prices rise
and farmers in developing countries respond by growing more
food.