Food imported into the United States from countries with a low gross domestic product (GDP) poses higher risks than food from richer countries, according to a new study analyzing 10 years» worth of U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) data on
food import violations.
The novel analysis of FDA's 2002 - 2007 data on
food import violations suggests that «the size of a country's economy appears to be a more important determinant of food safety than its wealth,» or GDP per capita, according to the study, «Import Security: Assessing the Risks of Imported Food.»
Not exact matches
Imports can be refused for botulism, filth, rotting
foods, or other blatant
food - safety concerns, as well as for «less dramatic
violations,» such as the lack of required documentation.
[1] He was issued a «Notice of
Violation and Penalty» under the Agriculture and Agri -
Food Administrative Monetary Penalties Act [2] for
importing an «animal by - product» without complying with the requirements of section 40 of the Health of Animals Regulations.
Co-founder 39 - year - old Syed» Farhan» Huda of Arlington appeared in Federal Court to answer to charges of illegal importation and introducing misbranded drugs into interstate commerce, according to Boston.com Court documents show that the company made millions in profits between 2009 and 2013 by, «illegally
importing chemotherapy and cosmetic surgery drugs, in
violation of the
Food and Drug Administration's regulatory scheme (Boston.com).»
The land grab scenario, they say, would mean that: «Aside from human rights
violations becoming commonplace, employment would decline, production would fade and
imports would rise, leading to high levels of
food insecurity... This scenario would rank poorly from both an economic and a legal point of view.»