Sentences with phrase «foot building cost»

J Scott, I'm very curious what your final square foot building cost was for the project if you don't mind sharing.

At our $ 67 per square foot building cost (based on current estimates), we'd actually be under budget if we had stuck with building our original floor plan.

Not exact matches

It cost 5 million euros ($ 5232000) to build, and the road, with its 30,000 square feet of solar panels, is being tested over a two - year trial period to see if it can actually create enough energy to power the village's street lights.

Concrete and steel buildings that need reinforcement could see costs of $ 50 to $ 100 per square foot.

The 1,000 - square - foot clinic, which cost $ 60,000 to build, has proved to be a good bet.

Some of these modern day Towers of Babel seem nothing more than a conspicuous display of wealth: completed in 2010 and standing at 2717 feet, Dubai's Burj Khalifa (pictured) cost a staggering $ 1.5 billion to build.

Potential Savings in Five Major Cost Areas From Sustainable Building Management Practices for a Theoretical 250,000 Square - Foot Building in San Francisco

Another thoroughly documented project calculated total building costs at $ 51,450, or $ 37 per square foot based on exterior dimensions of 1,200 square feet.

DFP will be built on 48 million square feet within DWSC, which is reported to be the world's largest wholesale hub occupying 550 million square feet that will be completed over a ten - year period with an estimated cost of $ 8.2 bn.

How well the state of California has succeeded in preparing for her guests can be best summarized by statistics: 45 miles of cross-country runs, 14 miles of downhill trail and, of course, the great jump, 1,300 feet from top to bottom, are all ready and now being tested by advance contingents of skiers; three ski lifts have been constructed at a cost of $ 600,000; $ 50,000 has been spent to secure Squaw against the chance of avalanche; communications on the downhill courses require 80 miles of telephone wire; blasting the trails smooth took two tons of dynamite; 12 miles of construction road were built; it took 50 men and $ 250,000 to build the ski jump.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

The referendum issue six years ago sought $ 11.4 million, but Curran said the 60,000 - square - foot building under consideration would cost about $ 6 million.

The Elk Grove Park District is looking at building a 13,000 - square - foot skate park at an estimated cost of $ 660,000 at Audubon Park.

A 45,500 - square - foot facility, the committee estimates, would cost about $ 6.6 million to build.

The new facility, expected to be about 60,000 square feet, will be attached to the country club building, enabling the Park District to cut costs by sharing locker room space and other amenities, officials said.

California - based Niagara Bottling is proposing the construction of a 414,800 - square - foot plant at an estimated cost of $ 53 million to build off Boice's Lane.

But the newly refurbished park became a pyrrhic victory for Greenfield when he learned it cost $ 2 million to build the new, 400 - square - foot bathroom facility.

He was willing to foot the entire cost for building the stadium, he wrote to William Stern, commissioner of the Urban Development Corp..

Switchbot The U.C.S.D. research project that led to Switchbot was about twice the size of the two - foot final product and cost nearly $ 1,800 in parts to build.

The 375,000 gross - square - foot - building, projected to cost $ 131.5 million dollars, will house a unique combination of programs from the biological and physical sciences.

Peter Lehrer, chairman of a school commission appointed by former chancellor Harold Levy in 2001, found that it cost $ 425 to $ 450 per square foot to build a new school, far more than the $ 300 to $ 325 per square foot it takes to put up office towers, luxury condos, and hospitals in the same city.

«The FCI is calculated by dividing the cost of all repair, replacement and renovation needs across the district's 15.2 million square feet of buildings by the current replacement value of all district facilities.

The average U.S. building cost is $ 95.51 / square foot.

Construction costs will range, but a good ballpark is $ 150 per square foot — so a 2,000 - sq - ft home will cost you $ 300,000 to build.

For instance, a custom built house using standard building methods should cost anywhere from $ 400 / square foot to $ 1,000 per square foot.

Using building containers, this cost could drop to $ 225 to $ 350 per square foot.

In contrast, Jason had previously built a 400 - sq - ft log cabin on the property which set him back $ 40,000 — not including electricity, plumbing and finishes, items that would easily push the cabin's build cost to $ 200 or $ 250 a square foot.

You can build for about $ 100 per square foot, at least half the cost of a traditionally built home WHO IT»S FOR: If you love building with Lego, you'll really dig this build WHO IT IS N'T FOR: Those dreaming of wide, expansive rooms.

Quick Look: Cage Width: Varies Cage Depth: Varies Cage Height: Varies Bin Material: Clear Plastic Screen Material: Typically galvanized metal hardware cloth Included Accessories: None Cubic Feet: Varies Suitable Housing For: 1 Syrian Hamster Average Price: $ 20 - $ 40 New Pros: Light weight, easy to clean and move, can provide lots more floor space than traditional hamster cages Cons: Cost of building can be high if you have no tools on hand already, expect 1 - 3 hours for assembly depending on design

PetSmart Charities is funding 100 percent of the build - out costs for the new center, which will occupy about 2,000 square feet of space that is being converted inside the store.

Land north of where the reef meets the shore can be purchased for as little as $ 2 000 per front foot but for now consider it a long - term investment not a place to build and live (access is difficult and consequently costs for development are high making these properties no real bargain if you want to develop them now).

With a cost of 50 million dollars to build, the attention to detail is unparalleled: from the four - foot chandelier with fiber optic lights, gilded bronze around the library bookshelves, a Bosendorfer piano resting in front of floor - to - ceiling windows and 22 - carat gold threads on the bedspread, the suite is unlike any other.

The Hotel Ark has the living space of 151,000 square feet that would cost roughly the same as building an energy - efficient house.

The project will have two subsequent phases costing about $ 1.2 million, including the building of a 100 - foot pier, beach, amphitheater for public concerts, and other amenities.

Built at a cost of $ 425 million (throw in another $ 433 million for land acquisition, endowment and temporary quarters), Taniguchi's design added 250,000 square feet to MoMA.

The John Baldessari Art Studio Building, which has already opened, cost $ 3.1 million to build and features approximately 7,000 square feet of space — much of it used as studio space for art students and faculty.

The new museum, which opens to the public this week, features approximately twenty thousand square feet of exhibition space over three floors in a surprisingly voluminous building created by the French architect Christian de Portzamparc at a cost of over twenty million dollars.

The engineer for the project notes that these cost $ 1.800.000 (US$ 2.5 million), well over a quarter of the budget and twenty bucks a foot on the building's hard costs.

The largest tiny home belonged to Marc Leblanc and Josée Godin, a structure built onsite by HMG, measuring over 300 square feet and costing $ 50,000, constructed with reclaimed wood.

Because of the fixed costs of overhead and the crane, at a thousand square feet it is almost impossible to do a prefab as cheaply as site built.

At the federal level we recommend increasing The Energy Efficient Commercial Buildings Deduction from $ 1.80 per square foot for the 50 % energy consumption reduction (cost savings) to 1) $ 3.50 per square foot for meeting a minimum 50 % energy consumption reduction target below ASHRAE 90.1 - 2004, 2) $ 5.00 per square foot for meeting a minimum 75 % energy consumption reduction target, and 3) $ 6.50 per square foot for a building that is carbon neutral.

The finished two bedroom and one bathroom house will measure 956 square feet, while the building costs are $ 250,000.

The 40,000 square - foot, building will be ready in late 2014 at a cost of $ 54 million.

The nearly 40,000 - square - foot three - story building cost $ 54 million to build and can accommodate about 100 employees, according to lab officials.

The easiest way to cut costs is to build small, so almost every plan I design is less than 1,000 interior square feet.

My passive solar, earth sheltered, post and beam framed house cost about $ 8 per square foot to build, not including labor.

These buildings achieve substantially better performance across a range of environmental measures, and in many cases the cost per square foot can be comparable to that of conventional buildings.

Proof that one does not need to build 50 homes at a time in order to lower the cost of building green is provided by Philadelphia developer Postgreen, which built a 1,150 square foot LEED Platinum row house for a construction cost of only $ 100,000.

The three - story, nearly 40,000 square - foot, building cost $ 59 million with funding coming from the University of California, the California Public Utilities Commission, appropriations from the State of California, and private support from the Simons Foundation, Sea Change Foundation, and Mark Heising and Liz Simons.

The study concluded that certification raised construction costs by $ 4 per square foot but that because operating costs as well as employee absenteeism and turnover were lower and productivity was higher than in other buildings, the standard - and silver - certified buildings earned a profit over the first 20 years of $ 49 per square foot, and the gold - and platinum - certified buildings earned $ 67 per square foot.