Here's the pre-publication version of the study: Methane and the Greenhouse - Gas
Footprint of Natural Gas from Shale Formations
[xvi] RW Howarth, Santoro, R & Ingraffea, A, «Methane and the greenhouse - gas
footprint of natural gas from shale formations», Climate Change, 2011, viewed 14 September 2012, http://www.eeb.cornell.edu/howarth/Howarth et al 2011.
Robert Howarth's study, «A Bridge to Nowhere: Methane Emissions and the Greenhouse Gas
Footprint of Natural Gas,» published May 20, 2014 in the journal Energy Science and Engineering, gave the methane scare a much - needed boost.
In these terms, the actual
footprint of natural gas is actually larger than the footprint of coal.
Howarth's study, «A Bridge to Nowhere: Methane Emissions and the Greenhouse Gas
Footprint of Natural Gas,» will be published May 20 in the journal Energy Science and Engineering.
Original post In 2011, a Cornell research team led by the environmental scientist Robert Howarth published «Methane and the greenhouse - gas
footprint of natural gas from shale formations,» a widely discussed paper positing that gas escaping from drilling operations using hydraulic fracturing, widely known as fracking, made natural gas a bigger climate threat than the most infamous fossil fuel, coal.
However, when used for domestic heating of water, the greenhouse gas
footprint of natural gas is at least two - times larger than that of using modern electric - driven heat pumps.
The Howarth paper, «Methane and the greenhouse - gas
footprint of natural gas from shale formations,» had estimated that leakage of gas from hydraulic fracturing operations (given that natural gas is mainly methane, a potent heat - trapping substance) and other factors made the climate impact of gas from such wells substantially worse than that of coal, measured per unit of energy.
Not exact matches
Insofar as it replaces carbon - intensive coal and oil power,
natural gas is a huge gain in cutting the country's carbon
footprint, all while creating new jobs and bringing power to isolated parts
of the country.
Most hydrogen fuel is derived from
natural gas in a process that releases plenty
of carbon dioxide, so the car and its 134 - horsepower electric motor fall short
of being
footprint - free.
This simple switch could pave the way toward a more environmentally friendly method
of extracting
natural gas that would do less collateral damage to the land and water while dramatically reducing fracking's carbon
footprint at the same time.
Many current energy debates have focused on the massive carbon
footprint of fossil fuels like oil, coal and
natural gas.
However,
natural gas has a number
of advantages over the other main fossil fuels that give it the potential to substantially reduce our carbon
footprint.
AGL Acquisition — Expected to Close in Late 2016 Southern's business and geographical
footprint will significantly change after it closes its acquisition
of natural gas utility AGL Resources (AGL).
The typical family's carbon
footprint is only about 1/4 to 1/3 due to it's direct use
of electricity,
natural gas and petroleum — the rest comes from all the stuff we buy (including that which is bought for us, like roads and airports).
Natural gas is widely considered to be an environmentally cleaner fuel than coal because it does not produce detrimental by - products such as sulfur, mercury, ash and particulates and because it provides twice the energy per unit
of weight with half the carbon
footprint during combustion.
Another course participant, Matt Briggs, who is a wild mushroom seller and Near - Net - Zero Retrofit house owner and the writer, director, and producer
of the documentary Deep Green - Solutions to Stop Global Warming Now «was waiting for the affordable Model 3 to plug into my 10kw solar roof so I can finally almost eliminate my carbon
footprint for coal electricity,
natural gas heat, and now oil transport.»
The report ends with pages and pages
of data on their
footprint; the reductions in electricity use and
natural gas saved are extraordinary.
And the carbon
footprint per mile
of driving an electric car declines every time the grid gets cleaner, whether from adding renewable energy sources or replacing a coal - fired generation plant with one using
natural gas.
I also consider hat
natural gas driven power plants would have a better environmental
footprint than that
of coal, especially brown coal.
Higher density sources
of fuel such as coal and
natural gas utilized in centrally - produced power stations actually improve the environmental
footprint of the poorest nations while at the same time lifting people from the scourge
of poverty... Developing countries in Asia already burn more than twice the coal that North America does, and that discrepancy will continue to expand... So, downward adjustments to North American coal use will have virtually no effect on global CO2 emissions (or the climate), no matter how sensitive one thinks the climate system might be to the extra CO2 we are putting back into the atmosphere.
The Energy
Footprint: How Oil,
Natural Gas, and Wind Energy Affect Land for Biodiversity and the Flow
of Ecosystem Services.
In November 2016, Bullfrog Power and TD Bank Group launched a first -
of - a-kind renewable energy collaboration, encompassing the full suite
of Bullfrog's renewable energy products — green electricity, green
natural gas and green fuel — to address 100 per cent
of TD's energy
footprint for its Vancouver branches and a portion
of its business - related travel in Vancouver.
We (and others) have voiced concerns that taxing
natural gas, but not taxing coal, could make coal a relatively cheaper source
of electricity despite its heavier carbon
footprint.
They calculated the full - cycle land use required to generate 1 megawatt
of electricity from each source
of energy in 2015, including the land required to drill and mine for
natural gas and coal, the processing and transportation requirements and the power plant
footprint.
Robert Howarth is his colleague at Cornell, an ecologist who produced one
of the most controversial scientific studies
of the year: a paper arguing that
natural gas produced by fracking may actually have a bigger greenhouse
gas footprint than coal.
These omissions included: (a) the lack
of recognition that dependence on
natural gas as a bridge fuel for reducing the US carbon
footprint raises several ethical questions, a matter reviewed here in detail, (b) acknowledgment
of the US special responsibility for climate change for its unwillingness to take action on climate change for over 20 years since it ratified the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in 1992, see, The World Waits In Vain For US Ethical Climate Change Leadership As the World Warms, and, (c) failing to communicate the extreme urgency
of quickly and significantly reducing ghg emissions in the next few years to give the world any hope
of avoiding dangerous climate change, see, On the Extraordinary Urgency
of Nations Responding To Climate Change on the Basis
of Equity.
The first step for Manitoba Harvest in becoming carbon neutral was figuring out their carbon
footprint — which is the impact one has on the environment as a result
of using electricity and
natural gas.
Given that the United States has strong ethical responsibilities to rapidly reduce its carbon
footprint, a matter examined extensively in Ethicsandclimate.org, one might initially conclude that as a matter
of ethics switching to
natural gas from coal combustion is ethically justifiable as a short - term strategy.
Even if switching to
natural gas in the short term reduces the US carbon
footprint somewhat, it is still not sufficient by itself to put the US on an emissions reduction pathway consistent with its ethical obligations without other policy interventions including putting a price on carbon or rapid ramp up
of renewable energy.
«Through our renewed partnership with Bullfrog Power, we're taking into account more
of our emissions
footprint with green
natural gas and are now bullfrogpowering our Richmond Hill and Vancouver locations.»
Thanks to improved efficiency, the economic crisis and the fracking - fueled boom
of natural gas, which has a smaller carbon
footprint than coal, the United States has already seen a 15 percent reduction in electricity sector - generated CO2 emissions since 2005.
TreeHugger: With entire economies based on selling oil and
natural gas to fund massive, rapid growth and a per capita ecological
footprint larger than the United States, the United Arab Emirates is currently one
of the most unsustainable places in the world.
The production
of Renewable
Natural Gas (RNG) from organic waste for use as a vehicle fuel is an emerging strategy that businesses, states, and municipalities in the United States are pursuing to make use
of waste - derived methane and lower the carbon
footprint of vehicle fleets.
Four new incinerators will consume a great deal
of natural gas, and will increase the carbon
footprint of Naples.