A trial court's decision on this issue may only be reversed
for an abuse of that discretion to n deciding this issue.
In addition, the trial court must balance the probative value against the prejudicial effect of the old convictions on the record under Rule 609 (b)
for an abuse of discretion.
Initially, the First Circuit focused on the standards of Daubert / Kumho, stating that this type of expert testimony is subject to a Daubert review, that the trial judge has broad latitude in determining the admissibility of an expert, and that the trial judge's decision will only be reversed
for an abuse of discretion.
Highmark Decided That Appellate Courts Should Review All Aspects of a Section 285 Fee Determination
for Abuse of Discretion.
On appeal, the record was considered to ascertain facts of the case and reviewed
for any abuse of discretion.
The appeals court has held that division of marital property is within the sound discretion of the trial court, which means the only way to reverse is
for abuse of discretion.
Temporary relief orders for alimony must be supported by competent, substantial evidence and are reviewed
for an abuse of discretion.
A trial court's ruling on the relevancy issue is reviewed only
for an abuse of discretion.
We review the court's ruling on a petition for modification of child support
for an abuse of discretion.
But, because Thomson did not produce any supporting evidence, her claim fails whether we review it as a direct appeal or discretionary review, de novo or
for abuse of discretion.»
Not exact matches
Bill C - 25 would also eliminate the potential
for abuse of board
discretion following these elections and would restrict directors to one - year terms.
The culture
of consumerism and the chase
for material symbols
of wealth and security have sometimes come to be dominant; the pursuit
of spiritual fulfillment in many has slowly begun to degenerate into empty and sterile ritualism; the legitimate thirst
for education has often become perverted into an obsessive drive to acquire with the greatest speed the formal diplomas necessary to gain entry to jobs offering the easiest opportunities to make the quickest rupees; political statesmanship in some areas has begun to depreciate into an opportunities race
for power and position; the spirit
of SEVA (Service) to the nation has intermittently begun to be suffocated in many, by the
abuse of discretions, sometimes mediated by a bloated bureaucracy itself enmeshed in a vast network
of multiplying paper and self - proliferating regulations; menacingly many good and decent people even in public life, have come to be corroded by a culture
of demanding corruption; and some potentially creative lawyers, have begun to take perverted pride in mere «cleverness», rendering themselves vulnerable to the prejudice that they are a parasitic obstruction in the pursuit
of substantive justice.
According to the court papers, the lawyer
for the plaintiff alleges the names are «an an
abuse of the respondent's
discretion.»
Gipson notes the law would give judges the
discretion to allow facility dogs
for not only child
abuse victims, but
for any victim or witness
of a violent crime or sexual assault, as well any children or adults impaired in any way, on the defense or prosecution side.
The only sense to be made
of it is that Taking Lives intends some sort
of angry statement about a woman's choice
of career over family (an early conversation chides Illeana
for, essentially, being successful in a traditionally male profession), finding a fugitive breed
of Ashley Judd - like glee in punishing its powerful feminine centre with physical
abuse - into - mutilation, rape
of a kind, and a brutal disdain
for her intelligence and
discretion.
The Rita standard
for a guidelines sentence seems to be an «
abuse of discretion plus» standard
of review.
The Virginia Court
of Appeals found there was no
abuse of discretion by the trial judge in denying husband's request
for a continuance or denying his motion to reopen the case.
The court recognized that the standard
of review on appeal
for an award
of spousal support was an
abuse of discretion, citing Fox v. Fox, 61 Va..
On appeal, the Virginia Court
of Appeals recognized that the applicable standard
for reviewing a trial court's ruling that a party was in contempt
of court was the
abuse of discretion standard, citing Epps v. Commonwealth, 47 Va..
Historically (long, long ago to the point that there is no leading case establishing this rule), you could challenge a verdict based upon a failure
of a judge to dismiss a juror
for cause (or
for improperly dismissing a juror
for cause) when this was an
abuse of discretion.
Trial judges have wide
discretion in fashioning appropriate relief
for spoliation
of evidence, and there was no
abuse of that
discretion.
In the expanded panel's decision denying General Plastic's request
for rehearing, the board announced that when exercising its
discretion to institute, it will consider both the AIA's goal
of providing an «effective and efficient alternative» to federal court litigation, but also «the potential
for abuse of the review process by repeated attacks on patents.»
The Court
of Appeals recognized the potential
for prejudice with allowing this evidence but ultimately decided that given his confession and the State's «sturdy» case the trial court did not
abuse its
discretion by admitting the evidence.
After factoring in the reduction
for duplication (given that 23 individuals billed on the case), the fee award was determined to be no
abuse of discretion.
At Objective - Justice, Sean Sirrine writes: «I am at a loss as to why they think it would be a good idea to remove the potential
of discipline
of judges
for abusing their
discretion.»
I have called a tie between Nickey Johnson's submission regarding prosecutorial
discretion and its potential
for abuse and Stefon Lyons and Arely Lopez's team submission regarding the use
of Big Data to predict legal outcomes.
It also gives an example where a court found that» [e] ven where need is established, if the other spouse does not have the ability to pay, it is an
abuse of discretion for a court to impose such an obligation upon one
of the destitute parties which will hang as a sword over the obligor».
In his appeal
of the suspension, Gleason asserted violations
of both his first and fifth amendment rights, as well as an
abuse of discretion by the bankruptcy court
for the sixty - day suspension.
Particularly when the standard is — as it is
for most evidentiary issues — an
abuse of discretion.
Under the district court's inherent power to sanction an attorney
for litigation
abuses, the attorney's violation
of a protective order that he fashioned was certainly well within the district judge's
discretion to sanction.
Wife argues that the family court
abused its
discretion by failing to award her compensatory attorney's fees and expenses
for her efforts to enforce the terms
of the Final Decree.
The Supreme Court applied the
abuse of discretion standard, meaning that even
for less serious crimes, trial judges will have wide leeway to impose lifetime probation.
Given the «typical case» characterization
of the trial judge and the deferential
abuse of discretion standard
of review, the appellant court perceived the lower court could have reasoned that the hourly rate was too high or number
of hours claimed excessive
for a case which was not extraordinary in nature.
The Court concludes... that the district court
abused its
discretion in denying Slatten's motion to sever his trial from that
of his co-defendants and therefore vacates his conviction and remands
for a new trial.
In Phillips v. United Service Automobile Association, Justice Lopez
of the Court
of Appeals
of New Mexico deferred to this rendering
of the maxim De Fide et Officio Judicis non Recipitur Quaestio, sed de Scientia Sive sit Eror Juris sive Facti to defeat an application that the fact
of an eight month delay by the trial judge to render judgment was in and
of itself an
abuse of discretion and grounds
for appeal:
The next case shows how a litigant may convince an appellate court that legal error was committed (de novo review
of a fee entitlement issue), but the battle
for reversal is lost
for failure to surmount an
abuse of discretion issue (failure to apportion fees between covered and uncovered fee claims
for relief).
United States First Circuit, 10/11/2010 US v. Brown Defendant's conviction
for possession
of cocaine base with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) although the district court's factual findings and the inferences made from those findings, which formed the basis
of its conclusion that reasonable suspicion existed to stop a car, are not compelled by the record or by the facts, both are nonetheless reasonable and therefore pass constitutional muster; 2) the affirmance
of the district court's finding that the officers had reasonable suspicion to stop the car forecloses the need to address defendant's challenge to the district court's alternate conclusion that the car was not seized when the officers first approached; and 3) there was no
abuse of discretion in the district court's denial
of defendant's motion to suppress evidence without an evidentiary hearing.
The standard
of review was determinative, because a «good faith» determination in this context is a discretionary call
for the lower court and reviewed under the
abuse of discretion standard.
[UNPUBLISHED][Per Curiam - Before Bye, Beam and Gruender, Circuit Judges]: On remand from the Supreme Court
for reconsideration under Gall v. U.S.. Under the more deferential
abuse -
of -
discretion review outlined in Gall, the district court did not
abuse its
discretion in sentencing defendant to 132 months, and the sentence is affirmed.
Every public body and its officers, employees and agents acting within the scope
of their employment or duties... are immune from liability
for... Any claim based upon the performance
of or the failure to exercise or perform a discretionary function or duty, whether or not the
discretion is
abused.
In Raggett v (1) Society
of Jesus Trust 1929
for Roman Catholic Purposes (2) Preston Catholic College Governors [2010] EWCA Civ 1002, [2010] All ER (D) 116 (Aug) it was held that in a sexual
abuse claim where the
abuse was historic, the order in which the judge approached issues
of liability and limitation did not affect the substance
of an overall assessment as to whether it was appropriate to exercise judicial
discretion under the Limitation Act 1980, s 33 to disapply the limitation period.
A decision about trial management,
for example, can be in some sense «wrong» without being an
abuse of discretion.
This is because to decide whether the court
abused its
discretion in awarding costs and fees, the Eighth Circuit necessarily must decide if it was objectively reasonable
for Pfizer to challenge the joinder
of these plaintiffs and the lack
of personal jurisdiction over the out -
of - state plaintiffs» claims.
Response: We agree with the comments that victims
of domestic violence and other forms
of abuse need special consideration in order to avoid further harm, and we provide
for discretion of a covered entity to determine that protected health information not be disclosed pursuant to § 164.510 (b).
Non-dog neighbors brought a malicious prosecution and
abuse of discretion suit against dog - owning neighbors and their litigation attorney, with the attorney settling with non-dog neighbors
for a pretrial amount
of $ 17,500 and non-dog owners «lighting» up their neighbors with an award
of $ 305,106.04 in economic damages (consisting
of attorneys fees paid by non-dog owners to their counsel in the prior proceedings and malicious prosecution suit) and $ 25,000 in economic damages.
Some experts feel that this so - called «
discretion» needs to be defined much more clearly since, as it is being reported in many cases, this privilege may have been exploited or
abused at times, at the expense
of MAs, who might be left to face the consequences
for being asked to do things that they were, quite frankly, never supposed to be doing.
For example, if a parent provides evidence of physical or sexual abuse, or a parent willfully abandoned the child for an extended period of time, the court in its discretion may find that the parent is unf
For example, if a parent provides evidence
of physical or sexual
abuse, or a parent willfully abandoned the child
for an extended period of time, the court in its discretion may find that the parent is unf
for an extended period
of time, the court in its
discretion may find that the parent is unfit.
If the measures were targeted solely to parents or families in need
of assistance to prevent neglect or
abuse of children, as they are in s123UC
of the legislation, then some form
of income management may be capable
of being seen as an appropriate exercise
of the governments «margin
of discretion'to ensure that families benefit from welfare and receive the minimum essentials
for survival.