But how is it that the leader of the world's largest «
animal protection» organization believed that there could be no rehabilitation
for the dogs (the victims), but they now
completely believe in rehabilitation
for the person responsible
for victimizing the dogs.
She argued in her opinion that acts with
animals are «inherently exploitive» and the narrow definition of bestiality «
completely undermines the concurrent legislative
protections for animals from cruelty and abuse.»