Articulated by editor Jim Wallis in his book Agenda
for Biblical People, as well as by editorials and articles by the staff, the Sojourners position reflects a Christian radicalism steeped in the Anabaptist tradition - one committed to rigorous discipleship, corporate life - style, and societal critique.
(For a couple of autobiographical accounts along these lines, see the introductions to Donald Dayton's Discovering an Evangelical Heritage and Jim Wallis's Agenda
for Biblical People.)
Not exact matches
The Deep State elite, which
for decades has exhibited an endless lust
for other
people's money and greed that is beyond
biblical, is simply not going to allow every day citizens to benefit from gold holdings that have surged in value.
It makes
for better Christians, better
people, and a more
biblical existence.
In fact, they can convince the majority of the
people they are right, but the truth [
biblical] is not up
for majority vote.
Clearly, there is
biblical precedent
for calling
people out when they use the name of God to cover their own selfish or malicious intentions.)
You hit the nail squarely on the head
for indeed so,
biblical truths are «written on our heart» by way of the Presence of Christ's Indwelt Spirit Who is ever faithful to «guide you into all truth» and «show (us) things to come» (John 16:13) but the problem is (as is woefully evident with this Article \ s Author), too many
people (believers) choose to eschew or disregard «sound doctrine» (2 Timothy 4:3) promulgating John 14:17 ignorance of the Doctrine of The Holy Spirit whose inevitable product is a darkened understanding (such as is evidenced by the Article's Author --RRB-.
In fact, by failing to do so, you become a culprit by not probing their minds to make sure that whether they are aware of this
biblical truth and hence being perished and away from that everlasting love
for eternity — and
for this very reason and negligence or misguidance, you will be responsible and accountable when you meet with your creator God of love whom he also loved you so much that if you were the only
person living on the face of this earth and planet, still he would have come and died
for you and the forgiveness of your since and loving you unconditional.
Take any dozen of these
people and put them in separate rooms with a
biblical passage to interpret
for themselves and you'll get twelve different answers.
And just so you know, the fact that more and more
people like you feel the need to speak up with your hatred of all things
biblical or Christian, makes
people like me very happy because it tells us that the very book, the Bible, that you diss, is absolutely right because it has been warning us
for hundreds of years that thoughts like yours will increase.
These passages suggest that the
biblical solution to injustice — racial or otherwise — is not just to pray that
people have a change of heart but
for people to take responsibility
for the societies they have built — or in our case, inherited.
In addition, with the overwhelming majority of
people continuing to enjoy heterosexual marriage, I am not persuaded that the
biblical theme of gender complementarity, which is modeled between Christ and the Church, is under threat, nor that this theme is authoritative
for all relationships.
God intimately chose His
people, and this foreknowing is the foundation of His predestination, so if we were to translate the
Biblical meaning of foreknowledge into Romans 8:29 it would read like this, «
For those whom God intimately set His affection upon beforehand, He also predestined...» And this meaning is in sync with the rest of the Bible.
Yet even
for the
people in the more generous lower tax brackets, the
biblical benchmark of giving 10 percent of income is a stretch.
It is all so outdated
for the human race... I don't understand why so many
people need such strong faith in a
biblical text to carry out their lives happily and productively.
There is a final way that the Church often fails gay
people, and that is by watering down the
biblical vision
for sexual holiness and human fulfilment in a misguided attempt to be more welcoming.
Certainly Equiano became an eloquent critic of slavery; nevertheless,
for him, Noll writes,
biblical religion meant «the nearly total application of Scripture to the liberating effect of the Christian gospel
for the individual
person.»
I can only guess that black
people embrace the religion which seemed to dehumanize them
for the same reasons millions of women continue to embrace Christ though their «
Biblical submission» to their husbands has resulted in great emotional and physical abuse.
Of course, these
biblical passages have in mind, in particular, the transmission of a religious tradition: the story of God's care
for his
people.
If you want to reach our culture
for Jesus, the best (and most
biblical) thing you can do is show
people Jesus and invite them to follow Jesus with you.
For who, after all, are the
people that march in the
biblical parade?
So I am always delighted when I come across a
biblical passage like that in Isaiah 25:6 - 9 where the prophet says: «On this mountain the Lord of hosts will make
for all
people a feast of fat things....
We had more than 300
people apply to be part of the launch team
for A Year of
Biblical Womanhood, and because I absolutely hate not including everyone — especially when just about everyone had amazing ideas and meaningful words of encouragement — I've left the selection process to my team at Thomas Nelson.
This
person had no idea how much hell I've taken from
people in my evangelical community
for writing about my doubts, my questions related to heaven and hell, my views on
biblical interpretation and theology, and my support
for women in ministry and other marginalized
people in the Church.
I have been searching all my adult life
for the
biblical concept of ekklesia — a gathering led by the presence of God where ordinary
people are free to share and minister to one another according to 1 Corinthians 14:26.
After that I'll be spending Sunday (October 6) with the good
people of St. Matthew's Episcopal Church in Louisville, Kentucky, speaking at the 10 a.m. service and then sharing about my «year of
biblical womanhood» at a 7 p.m.
for their Dimensions of Faith series.
I can point to this as grounds
for accusing the
biblical deity of immoral behavior, e.g. I would not unnecessarily harm another
person's other wise innocent children because I would not want anyone (mortal or deity) to unnecessarily harm my own children.
With the changing demographics in America, including the racial and ethnic, socioeconomic, immigration, and
biblical justice challenges of our day, it is more important than ever
for people of color to have safe places to live authentically, serve humbly, and use their influence and experiences to shape our theology (what we know and believe about God) and our praxis (the ethics of our human behavior or what we actually do).
This is very difficult
for many
people to comprehend,
for I recall vividly how this
biblical episode was treated in Cecil B. De Mille's The Ten Commandments.
While I have a great deal of respect
for the many godly
people I know who subscribe to the theology of exclusivism, I no longer believe that it is the only
biblical view.
For many years, I felt that part of my call as a writer and blogger of faith was to be a different sort of evangelical, to advocate for things like gender equality, respect for LGBT people, and acceptance of science and biblical scholarship within my communi
For many years, I felt that part of my call as a writer and blogger of faith was to be a different sort of evangelical, to advocate
for things like gender equality, respect for LGBT people, and acceptance of science and biblical scholarship within my communi
for things like gender equality, respect
for LGBT people, and acceptance of science and biblical scholarship within my communi
for LGBT
people, and acceptance of science and
biblical scholarship within my community.
What those who try to explain events from a
biblical context often overlook is when they attempt to explain something and come up short, it regularly opens the door
for people to refute their inadequate explanation.
I'm no
biblical scholar, but this is addressed in Romans 1:20 «
For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities — his eternal power and divine nature — have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that
people are without excuse.»
Of course,
for most
people, before they can ever believe in Jesus
for eternal life, they need to have other beliefs about themselves, the existence and nature of God, and some other
biblical truths.
Biblical literalism is a powerful force today; it tends to imprison
people in attitudes that were suitable enough when science and technology were little dreamt of but which fail to illuminate a society in which,
for instance, it is desirable, because of the effects of modern hygiene on death rates,
for women to bear, on the average, perhaps a third as many infants as were appropriate two or three thousand or even two hundred years ago, a society in which war might mean something like the end of the species, or at least vastly closer to that than any war of the past could be.
creationism is far from an adult theory, its a child like story with fantasy elements based on myth and NO science, we always hear about these crazy
people trying to outlaw evolution.But has you stated we have billions of years of evidence, thanks
for helping us evolutionists out, unfortunately you have none, just a book, no science, no artifacts, no garden of eden, no bones of adam or eve or even the snake
for that matter, no ark, no proof of a
biblical flood, no proof of a created world by a higher power, no nothing..
We seem to have
biblical evidence
for one in the first chapter of the Letter to the Galatians, where St. Paul describes, very telegraphically, how he came to grasp an astonishing truth: that the salvation promised to the
People of Israel in the covenants with Abraham and Moses had been extended to the Gentiles.
Biblical references of the Household of God is dual, one referring to the spiritual; and the other referring to the comprehensive political economy of God
for the whole
people of God.
It is an exceedingly appropriate
biblical model
for theologies founded in the suffering and oppression of the world's marginal
peoples.
Even from a
biblical standpoint, the Hebrew God considered burning
people an abomination, and that was
for just a few moments, why would he then create a place of eternal fiery torment
for all his children who disobey?
Turning the tables on the time - honored conceit that Americans are God's chosen
people, Phelps and his followers insist that «God is America's enemy» because the United States has abandoned
biblical principles
for the evils of homosexual lust.
ok... I think there was 1 question in there that was a
Biblical reference... so why should evangelicals score 100 %??? I feel sorry
for all the venemous
people that are so full of hate... try to grow up a little and open your mind and let God in so He can heal all of those hurts so you can let go of the hate and poison in your hearts!!
The secret call as always remains important, but in the conception of the ministry that is emerging out of the
Biblical and systematic theology of the day and out of the personal reflections of young
people and their pastors, the divine action whereby men are chosen
for their station and calling is less spiritualistically understood than was the case
for the past hundred years.
It is therefore extremely difficult
for the average
person so to translate the
biblical view into his own idiom that the ancient experiences become relevant to him.
And even though I continued to search
for a more traditionally orthodox basis
for my political commitments, I drew much inspiration and solace from the witness of Christian
people of more liberal theological convictions who modeled
for me a courageous commitment to the
biblical vision of justice and peace.
Not only that, but many of the
biblical passages that
people find the most troubling, and the most likely to be «mistaken», are affirmed willy - nilly by Jesus and the apostles with complete disregard
for any subsequent controversies that might emerge.
If the Hebrews were, in fact, a «serious
people» who viewed leisure as «folly» or at best an «impromptu» respite, then the «systematic hermeneutical task of appropriating the meaning of the
biblical message [concerning play]
for today's world» would be difficult, if not impossible.
On
Biblical grounds, we note,
for example, that Jesus» ministry is summarized in the Gospels in ways like the following: «And he went about all Galilee, teaching in their synagogues, and preaching the gospel of the kingdom and healing every disease and every infirmity among the
people.»
Many young
people in Latin America, who were motivated by the Gospel to love their neighbor and be concerned
for justice and freedom in their society, have often become Marxists simply because their churches did not provide
biblical instruction about Christian discipleship, or because they [their churches] were blind to clear demands from the Bible and opportunities and challenges provided by new social situations.80
Maintaining that no
people would have invented
for themselves so «disgraceful» a past as that of being slaves in a foreign land, he wrote that «of all Oriental chronicles, it is only the
Biblical annals that deserve the name of history.»